Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Circuits in Apple's iPhone charger are 'surprisingly complex and innovative'

A closer look at the wall charger that Apple ships with its iPhone has found that the hardware includes better and safer components than typical chargers.

An exhaustive analysis of the iPhone charger was conducted by Ken Shirriff (via Gizmodo), revealing that Apple utilizes a "surprisingly complex and innovative" circuit to convert AC input between 100 and 240 volts to 5 watts of smooth 5 volt power.

""Apple's power adapter is clearly a high-quality power supply designed to produce carefully filtered power," he wrote. "Apple has obviously gone to extra effort to reduce EMI interference, probably to keep the charger from interfering with the touchscreen.

"When I opened the charger up, I expected to find a standard design, but I've compared the charger to the Samsung charger and several other high-quality industry designs, and Apple goes beyond these designs in several ways."

One of Apple's main concerns with the design of its charger is safety. Shirriff found that Apple employs "super-strong AC prongs," as well as a "complex over-temperature / over-voltage shutdown circuit."

In particular, the strong charger prongs were likely prompted by a recall Apple initiated in 2008 for iPhone 3G USB power adapters. The recall began after Apple found that "certain conditions" could cause the prongs to snap off when the adapter is pulled from a wall outlet, potentially creating a shock for those who might touch an exposed connection.

Shirriff found that Apple's new and improve prongs are considerably more difficult to remove than counterfeit devices and even Samsung's chargers. Apple's prongs refused to budge even when they were pulled using pliers.

"They have large metal flanges embedded in the plastic of the case, so there's no way a prong can come loose short of the destruction of the charter," he said, adding: "I'm impressed with the effort Apple put into making the charger more safe after the recall."

Charger 2

The teardown also found that Apple's charging circuits pack an impressive amount of complexity into a size smaller than one inch. In all, the charger crams most of the components into a printed circuit board that is about the size of a quarter.

Even with superior components and greater safety, Shirriff speculated that Apple's charger is still sold for "almost all profit." Apple's higher-quality parts probably cost the company about a dollar extra, but the charger sells for about $20 more than similar competing options.



50 Comments

tallest skil 14 Years · 43086 comments

This is blatant copyright infringement! Samsung should sue over this! All Apple did was change the color of the…

 

Oh, wait.

 

On a more on-topic note, hey, Apple, how about a recall and replacement of the AA chargers you make? The batteries only ever charge to 60-80%.

boredumb 14 Years · 1418 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleInsider 

A closer look at the wall charger that Apple ships with its iPhone has found that the hardware includes better and safer components than typical chargers.
 

So, you are saying they should be sued any day now...?

dickprinter 16 Years · 1058 comments

WOW, talk about a cutting-edge, innovative company!! They use mustard seeds and rice as charger components. I've heard of an electric sparking pickle and a potato powering a light bulb but grains and seeds regulating hundreds of volts in a power adapter?....who woulda thunk?

mstone 18 Years · 11503 comments

That charger circuit board says July 31,08 which if that is the date, this design has been around awhile...and someone finally got around to a teardown? Perhaps Samsung did their own teardown to see what was in there, but decided not to copy it...for whatever reason. I'm sure people around here will offer an opinion on that.

mstone 18 Years · 11503 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dickprinter 

They use mustard seeds and rice as charger components.

That was an initiative taken in a response to Greenpeace's condemnation of not enough organic components in their circuit boards