Neil Hughes
Analyst Brian White said in a note to investors on Tuesday that he has continued to hear on his trip to Taiwan that Apple plans to launch a so-called "iPad mini" this September. White began to sound the drum for a September release on Monday, when he revealed that supply chain sources indicated Apple is gearing up for what could prove to be an "exciting" month.
White said on Tuesday that he thinks a smaller iPad would expand Apple's addressable market opportunity. By offering a new iPad at a lower price point, it would attract more price sensitive customers, and also offer an alternative for those who want a smaller tablet.
In particular, White believes that schools under budget constraints who cannot afford the current entry-level $399 iPad 2 might show interest in a smaller iPad. He also believes that some students might prefer to carry around a smaller and lighter iPad for classes.
Continued whispers of a new, smaller iPad from Taiwan come as a new survey, released earlier on Tuesday, found "highly encouraging" interest in a prospective "iPad mini" from Apple. Data from ChangeWave Research showed that 14 percent of North American consumers looking to buy a tablet would be "somewhat likely" to purchase a smaller iPad, while 3 percent indicated they are "very likely."
In fact, the numbers suggested to Dr. Paul Carton, ChangeWave's vice president of research, that a so-called "iPad mini" from Apple would be the greatest challenger to Apple's own market dominating full-sized iPad.
"At the moment, the greatest competitive threat to the new iPad could well be the iPad Mini — which doesn't exist yet, but even if it does, it too will be made by Apple," Carton said.
Rumors of a smaller iPad have persisted for years, even though late Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs famously panned smaller tablets, saying 7-inch devices were too small for users. Jobs said in October of 2010 that manufacturers of 7-inch tablets would need to ship sandpaper with the hardware, so users could file down their fingers to the point where they could hit smaller targets on the screen.
But in recent months, rumors became more specific, and suggested Apple has been experimenting with a prototype iPad with a screen size of 7.85 inches and a resolution of 1,024 by 768 pixels — the same resolution as the first-generation iPad and the iPad 2.
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Christine McKee
Malcolm Owen
Sponsored Content
Amber Neely
101 Comments
Lighter is probably better for kids. As I experience when on a trip, I am carrying the MBP and the iPad so it is more weight than I used to carry before the iPad came out. I still need the MBP for many tasks that the iPad can't do however I want to have the iPad handy for quick access and entertainment. I think it will be similar with school kids. Since the iPad won't be a total textbook replacement, at least in the beginning, they will be toting their books plus the iPad.
Has anybody considered that this 'mini iPad' might have an E-Ink style display to compete with the kindle?
[quote name="monstrosity" url="/t/150488/september-launch-of-ipad-mini-seen-boosting-education-sales#post_2121060"]Has anybody considered that this 'mini iPad' might have an E-Ink style display to compete with the kindle? [/quote] It has been suggested, but it's not likely. E-ink is too limited for multimedia devices - even the Kindle Fire dropped e-ink in favor of LCD.
Note previous Appleinsider post on "Collapse of Kindle..". All probably due to it not being an iPad. New form factor may be a iTouch replacement but it would not be a mini iPad. Why add a smaller competitor line that could conceivably take away from the premier product of the Apple line up?. Silly to suggest it.
[quote name="monstrosity" url="/t/150488/september-launch-of-ipad-mini-seen-boosting-education-sales#post_2121060"]Has anybody considered that this 'mini iPad' might have an E-Ink style display to compete with the kindle? [/quote] I don't see it. I also don't see any colour eInk on the horizon. I can, however, make a case for Apple dropping the iPhone 3GS in major markets as they will keep only the last 3 years of iPhones and then continuing to use the same display production to make these larger panels. It is rumoured to be the same 163 PPI of the of the first 3 iPhones so that should mean the cost is very low for Apple. [quote name="MacKrazyinKC" url="/t/150488/september-launch-of-ipad-mini-seen-boosting-education-sales#post_2121071"]Note previous Appleinsider post on "Collapse of Kindle..". All probably due to it not being an iPad. New form factor may be a iTouch replacement but it would not be a mini iPad. Why add a smaller competitor line that could conceivably take away from the premier product of the Apple line up?. Silly to suggest it.[/quote] I have trouble seeing the benefit of Apple weakening their iPad brand with a smaller, non-Retina, non-IPS panel that is using other components from several years prior and likely having some reduced components like the Kindle Fire to keep costs down.