AppleInsider Staff
Had the iPhone failed, it could have ended Apple as a company, attorney Harold McElhinny said during Tuesday's opening remarks of Apple v. Samsung in San Jose, Calif. He said that Apple came into the smartphone business with "no name in the field" and "no credibility," according to Josh Lowensohn of CNet.
"On January 9, 2007, when Steve Jobs and Phil Schiller went through that presentation," McElhinny said, referencing the unveiling of the first iPhone, "they were literally betting their company."
Apple's case against Samsung centers on the belief that the smartphone and tablet markets have changed dramatically thanks to Apple. During his remarks, McElhinny showed Samsung products from 2006, before the first iPhone was unveiled, to 2011, when Apple believes Samsung's products were infringing on its patent portfolio.
Tuesday marks the start of arguments in the trail, in which both Apple and Samsung have accused the other of patent infringement. The 10-person jury was selected for the trial on Monday.
Apple illustration of Samsung phones pre- and post-iPhone. | Source: Apple trial brief
The trial has begun more than a year and a half after Apple first sued Samsung for allegedly copying the look and feel of the iPhone and iPad. The two sides took part in court-ordered negotiations intended to avoid a trial, but those talks did not result in an out-of-court settlement.
William Gallagher
Thomas Sibilly
Andrew O'Hara
Amber Neely
Marko Zivkovic
Malcolm Owen
William Gallagher and Mike Wuerthele
112 Comments
If Samsung sells more smartphones then technically this is correct.
[quote name="jd_in_sb" url="/t/151644/apple-portrays-itself-as-smartphone-underdog-in-samsung-suit-opening-remarks#post_2158463"]If Samsung sells more smartphones then technically this is correct. [/quote] In 2006, Apple sold zero phones.
It's hard to imagine, as they are actually profiting more than Samsung, and having Samsung "imitations" exist makes the originals all the more desirable. :)
Absolutely, 100% correct. Apple started all of this.
What I never understood is how Android got away with pinch to zoom. I thought Apple had a patent on that plus all the other multitouch gestures. Without those you really don't have much of a smartphone.