Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Fitbit's 'basic' devices dominate wearables market, Apple Watch sneaks into third

Last updated

As the wearables market continues to evolve, new data shows a widening gap between basic and affordable fitness bands and more complex, do-it-all devices like Apple Watch — though the bulk of sales skew toward cheaper, simpler devices like Fitbit.

The burgeoning wearables segment continued to see explosive growth in the first quarter of 2016 with 19.7 million devices shipped, a 67 percent year-over-year increase, according to data from the IDC Worldwide Quarterly Wearable Device Tracker.

Researchers attribute surges in market demand to wider device distribution and healthy competition. Industry players, forced to differentiate their products in an increasingly crowded marketplace, are adopting new consumer targeting strategies. As the dust settles, the rift between basic single-use devices like Fitbit and complex all-in-ones like Apple Watch is widening, the study found.

"There's a clear bifurcation and growth within the wearables market," said Jitesh Ubrani senior IDC research analyst. "Smart watches attempt to offer holistic experiences by being everything to everyone, while basic wearables like fitness bands, connected clothing, or wearables have a focused approach and often offer specialized use cases."

Fitbit, focused on a single use for health and fitness tracking, continues to dominate overall wearable segment sales, leading with 4.8 million shipments and 24.5 percent marketshare in quarter one, up one million units from last year. While Fitbit's sale of prior product lines like Surge and Charge declined, the firm sold one million new Blaze smartwatches in the three month period ending in March.

Chinese upstart Xiaomi came in second with 3.7 million units shipped and a 19 percent marketshare, while Apple followed in third with 1.5 million units and 7.5 percent of the market.

In the smartwatch segment, IDC estimates that Apple is the industry's top vendor with a 46 percent share of the market, followed by Samsung with a 20.9 percent market share. Motorola comes in third with 10.9 percent of the market, while Huawei and Garmin round out the top five with 4.7 percent and 3 percent of the market, respectively. It should be noted that Apple has not announced specific sales figures for the Apple Watch, instead packaging those metrics into a catchall "Other" earnings report category.

In comparison to Apple's recently reduced $299 base model pricing, Fitbit's price point averaged $100 per device in the first quarter. The affordable pricing strategy, combined with a single purpose device, has helped Fitbit establish itself as a dominant player in the wearables market. Despite significant earnings, Fitbit's growing operating costs from $79 million to $215 million have led to lower stock gains and a weaker performance on Wall Street.

As for future growth prospects, some While wearables constitute a new category for Apple, the company is keenly interest in designing products that are personal and wearable every day, as CDO Jony Ive



28 Comments

rogifan_new 9 Years · 4297 comments

First of all why should we trust IDC on anything, second cheaper things have higher sales volume? Wow who knew? I'm shocked.

robin huber 22 Years · 4026 comments

Seems a "bit" like a false comparison. Is Watch a fitness band, or a watch with some fitness band functions? I think Watch does more of what a Fitbit does than a Fitbit does of of an Watch. When you add the gold version to the equation, these products are very different. They are not running in the same race, so what place they are in is interesting, but fundamentally meaningless. 

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

Seems a “bit" like a false comparison.

No, it’s all about innuendo and misdirection. Any article that insinuates a failure by Apple is popular and makes money. Notice the Apple “sneaks in third” in the headline. Of course cheap, single function wearable bands have nothing to do with the Watch but if you can put it in people’s minds that the Watch is a failure because it’s behind something else then so much the better. Like the “smartphone” market the “wearable” market encompasses numerous devices which are not in competition with Apple products, i.e. Fitbits. Apple centric blogs like AI are also popular withe iHater crowd so it pays to throw them a bone now and then.

slprescott 10 Years · 759 comments

More bicycles sell than airplanes too, but that has no meaning.

I'm curious about the %-of-category-profit. For smartphones, we've seen the estimate of Apple capturing 94% of the category profit, industry wide. What % of the smart watch category profit has Apple captured? I imagine it's high... at least 60%.

EsquireCats 8 Years · 1268 comments

IDC are just trying to do their best to position their customers in a good light.
For example: Here they'll compare a significantly limited health monitor to a fully featured smartwatch, but they won't compare a tablet computer to a personal computer.

It's also interesting that they'll even bother comparing sales volume in a category with such a massive difference in ASP. You might as well throw in American Apparel's Casio watch sales. Sadly Fitbit is as good as dead - cheap asian manufacturers will eat their low end device sales, and they're technically incapable of competing on the top end with Apple/Samsung/et. al.

By December this year we will be upon the visible symptoms of Fitbit's demise.