Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Samsung still No. 1 smartphone vendor, but Note 7 knocked marketshare back to 2014

Last updated

Leaning on an expansive lineup of affordable Android handsets, Samsung retained its spot as the world's top smartphone vendor for the third quarter of 2016, according to research firm IDC. However, premium phone makers — Apple and Samsung included — are being squeezed from the bottom, as manufacturers of cheaper Android alternatives gained ground.

According to fresh statistics from IDC's Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, Samsung shipped 72.5 million smartphones during the three-month period ending in September, good for 20 percent of the global market. The figure is down 13.5 percent from 83.8 million units shipped in the year ago quarter.

The last time Samsung took only 20 percent of the global market was in the fourth quarter of 2014, back when Apple trailed the Korean tech giant by only 0.16 percent.

"Samsung's market dominance in the third quarter was unchallenged in the short term even with this high-profile Galaxy Note 7 recall, but the longer term impact on the Samsung brand remains to be seen. If the first recall was a stumble for Samsung, the second recall of replacement devices face-planted the Note series," said Melissa Chau, associate research director, Mobile Devices at IDC.

Beyond global marketshare, the Note 7 discontinuation obliterated Samsung's quarterly earnings, with the company's mobile unit suffering a 96 percent year-over-year decline in operating profits.

Apple iPhone sales also declined by 5.3 percent to 45.5 million units, or 12.5 percent of the market over the same period. As noted in an earnings call on Tuesday, the performance helped eke out a Wall Street beat on revenues of $46.9 billon.

Looking ahead to the lucrative holiday quarter, Apple is set to capitalize on Samsung's mistake and momentum from its own iPhone 7 series launch. Supply for the latest iPhones is still constrained, with iPhone 7 Plus seeing particularly high demand thanks to differentiating technology like a dual-camera array. Apple CEO Tim Cook is confident that 4.7-inch iPhone 7 supply will equalize by the end of the year, but is less certain about iPhone 7 Plus stock.

Huawei came in third with a 9.3 percent marketshare on 33.6 million units shipped, up 23 percent from the same time last year.

Chinese upstarts Oppo and Vivo enjoyed the biggest year-over-year gains with shipment metrics jumping 121.6 percent and 102.5 percent, respectively. In comparison to Apple and Samsung, however, the two Chinese firms run relatively low production operations. Oppo shipped 25.3 million units in quarter three for a 7 percent share of the market, while Vivo managed 21.2 million units for a 5.8 percent stake.

Combined smartphone shipments hit 362.9 million units to grow one percent from the same time last year.



27 Comments

Ali1 8 Years · 3 comments

Apple will be on top with high in numbers if only calculated in premium smartphone segment

fotoformat 13 Years · 302 comments

They may be apt in this case, but I don't think "face-planted" are exactly PR words to use in an official statement by an 'associate research director'.

IDC loses more credibility in my book.

matrix077 9 Years · 868 comments

I love this "no. 1" moniker the press throwing around like it means something. Tesla can never be no.1 for car. Rolex can never be no.1 for watch. And Levi can never be no.1 for jeans sold all over the world.
So how is this moniker relevant again?

franklinjackcon 10 Years · 612 comments

matrix077 said:
I love this "no. 1" moniker the press throwing around like it means something. Tesla can never be no.1 for car. Rolex can never be no.1 for watch. And Levi can never be no.1 for jeans sold all over the world.
So how is this moniker relevant again?

They don't get an award for it so why are you so bothered? It's relevant info, e.g. for retailers, to know who sells the most units so they can plan advertising or for competitors to monitor who is growing so they can identify why. And btw none of you analogies to Tesla or Rolex are comparable. Maybe Levi's but I doubt any tech company would want to be compared to such a stodgy old brand

matrix077 9 Years · 868 comments

matrix077 said:
I love this "no. 1" moniker the press throwing around like it means something. Tesla can never be no.1 for car. Rolex can never be no.1 for watch. And Levi can never be no.1 for jeans sold all over the world.
So how is this moniker relevant again?
And btw none of you analogies to Tesla or Rolex are comparable.

Do elaborate. 

I'm glad you're agreeing with me that it's never relevant though.