Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Editor of Spike Jonze's HomePod ad details production process

Credit: frame.io

Last updated

Apple already gave us a behind the scenes look at the making of their incredible HomePod commercial starring FKA Twigs and directed by Spike Jonze. Now, Frame.io offers a closer look at the technical side of the production in an interview with editor Jeff Buchanon.

Buchanon, who has worked with Jonze on a number of other productions including the popular indie film Her, was in charge of editing the highly regarded Apple ad.

Like all Apple projects, the timeline was tight, which meant that editing needed to begin as soon as the footage was shot. In rare form for an editor, Buchanon was on set nearly the entire time during the filming of the HomePod commercial.

The entire ad spot was filmed in only four days, and post-production was completed in two weeks. Buchanan recalls the first footage was already being edited no more than two hours after filming began. Instead of being locked away in a remote editing bay collecting the dailies, footage came straight off their ALEXA XT cameras, to the DIT, to the assistant editor, then to Buchanan.

All of the footage, which was 1080p encoded in Avid's DNx36 code, was cut in Media Composer and handed off for color correction and conforming.

Jeff Buchanon Editor Sitting Credit: frame.io

A big detail that was revealed in the previous behind the scenes footage, was that most of the effects were practical, and shot on camera. Barring the mirror shot that relied on some light motion capture work, the lion's share of effects were elaborate hydraulic and human-powered set pieces.

This made the load a bit lighter on the editing team as there was not much VFX work to be done.

Another focus of the editing team was sound. Buchanan even highlighted setting the mood of the spot as one of the most difficult challenges. As soon as he saw the script, Buchanan was sourcing different sound effects to create that mood, especially the gloomy and dismal opening shots of the spot with heavy rainfall and the monotonous rumble of the train.

The full interview on the frame.io blog provides further detail.

Frame.io, for those uninitiated, is a video collaboration platform. It allows users to privately upload, review, and share video with the rest of their team, regardless of location. Aside from other editing platforms, they also have a plugin for Apple's Final Cut Pro X.

Apple's Spike Jonze ad, one of the most recent HomePod commercials, has received acclaim from viewers and critics. So far the YouTube video has racked up over 9 million views. It stars British performer FKA Twigs as a tired and overworked city dweller who has her day turned around by the HomePod and features a lively, and colorful, dance number choreographed by Ryan Heffington. Heffington is known for choreographing scenes in Baby Driver



9 Comments

Soli 9 Years · 9981 comments

I'm amazed at how much isn't CGI. It's already an incredible achievement from a creative and visual perfective, but even more more remarkable seeing how it was made.

lorin schultz 10 Years · 2744 comments

All of the footage, which was 1080p encoded in Avid's DNx36 code, was cut in Media Composer

Why is Media Composer so widely used? Does it have some capabilities or workflow benefits that other editors lack? Is it just inertia from its early days? What am I missing?

Several months ago I looked into finally finding a video editing platform for amateur personal use to replace my retired Final Cut Studio 7. I tried Final Cut X, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid Media Composer.

I really wanted to like Media Composer because it seems to be the most widely used in high-end production circles (yes, I know lots of pros use Adobe Premiere or Final Cut, but MC still seems to be the de facto standard). I figured since I'm proficient in Pro Tools I shouldn't have too much trouble picking up Media Composer. I was wrong. I'm sure with some training I probably could have figured it out, but absent that, the workflow seemed completely opaque.

Then I tried Final Cut X. One quick YouTube "how-to" video and I was getting work done. I don't know if my previous experience with FCP7 give me a leg up with FCPX or if it's just a lot easier to use, but I found myself wondering why it isn't more popular. I decided that, for me, the ease of use and low cost of Final Cut trumped any potential employability advantages of being proficient in Media Composer.

Is anyone here a full-time cutter who can weigh in on what makes MC the King of the castle? Should I be giving it another look? Aside from Avid editors always being in demand, are there compelling reasons to choose it over Final Cut?

filmjeff 6 Years · 17 comments

All of the footage, which was 1080p encoded in Avid's DNx36 code, was cut in Media Composer
Why is Media Composer so widely used? Does it have some capabilities or workflow benefits that other editors lack? Is it just inertia from its early days? What am I missing?

Several months ago I looked into finally finding a video editing platform for amateur personal use to replace my retired Final Cut Studio 7. I tried Final Cut X, DaVinci Resolve, and Avid Media Composer.

I really wanted to like Media Composer because it seems to be the most widely used in high-end production circles (yes, I know lots of pros use Adobe Premiere or Final Cut, but MC still seems to be the de facto standard). I figured since I'm proficient in Pro Tools I shouldn't have too much trouble picking up Media Composer. I was wrong. I'm sure with some training I probably could have figured it out, but absent that, the workflow seemed completely opaque.

Then I tried Final Cut X. One quick YouTube "how-to" video and I was getting work done. I don't know if my previous experience with FCP7 give me a leg up with FCPX or if it's just a lot easier to use, but I found myself wondering why it isn't more popular. I decided that, for me, the ease of use and low cost of Final Cut trumped any potential employability advantages of being proficient in Media Composer.

Is anyone here a full-time cutter who can weigh in on what makes MC the King of the castle? Should I be giving it another look? Aside from Avid editors always being in demand, are there compelling reasons to choose it over Final Cut?


Hey Lorin, I cut for scripted television and that's all Avid. It's mostly because it's what people know, gets the job done, and people "get" the workflow.

That said, it's a crappy piece of software that hasn't ever been majorly updated. They'll do tweaks here and there that bring it ever-so-slightly into the modern age but if you looked at it at the inception and now, it's largely the same.

The sub-35-somethings may make waves with FCPX, Premiere, or Resolve but most anyone over that is firmly entrenched in Avid. The botched release and bad-blood didn't help FCPX either.

I personally love FCPX and use it for my personal projects. Resolve seems interesting but haven't used it for editing. Premiere seems like Final Cut 7.5, people like it, but I don't.

Anyway, that's the short version of the Avid love, but I tell everyone I can about FCPX.

tuckerjj 14 Years · 35 comments

Looks like the interview was pulled. The link redirects to the frame.io blog homepage, and the article doesn’t seem to be listed there.

Soli 9 Years · 9981 comments

tuckerjj said:
Looks like the interview was pulled. The link redirects to the frame.io blog homepage, and the article doesn’t seem to be listed there.

This isn't an interview, but the making of, in case someone hasn't seen it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=go6Hpal8fUA