Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Trump administration promised Cook no iPhone tariffs

Last updated

Apple's CEO has emerged as a major diplomatic voice for the tech world, seeking to calm relations between the U.S. and China, a new report says.

According to a New York Times analysis published Monday, Tim Cook, in the Trump era, "has had to act a lot like the tech industry's top diplomat." For example, Cook recently met with Trump in the Oval Office on April 25, and called for "calmer heads" at a summit meeting in China the month before.

The Times reported for the first time that the administration has promised Cook that even as tariffs on Chinese goods move ahead, the U.S. government will not extend those restrictions to iPhone. It also reported further on Cook's meeting with Trump, which involved economic adviser Larry Kudlow and consisted mostly of the CEO praising last year's tax reform law, while also lobbying the president against a trade war with China.

The story does not clarify whether the no-iPhone-tariffs promise came in that White House meeting or at another time, nor whether it was delivered to Cook by the president himself or by someone else in the administration.

Interestingly, Cook has found cabinet members in the Trump administration more accessible than their Obama era counterparts. In particular, the Apple chief has agreed on issues with Treasury secretary Steven Mnuchin and, to a lesser extent, commerce secretary Wilbur Ross, the report said.

In addition, the Times detailed Cook's itinerary on his March visit to China, where he met with multiple senior figures in the Chinese government. Apple's attempts to cozy up to Chinese leadership has been nicknamed "Red Apple" by employees at Apple supplier Foxconn.

Trade war and peace

Apple's efforts are essentially focused on maintaining close ties with both governments and avoiding trade-related acrimony, which Cook and other Apple leaders consider bad for business.

China, throughout Cook's tenure as CEO, has become more and more important to Apple, both for supply chain reasons and because of the importance of China as a market.

Also in the Times piece, it's noted that the president has repeatedly told crowds that "Apple [plans] to build multiple factories in the United States. Apple has no plans to do so and has not publicly corrected him."

27 Comments

SpamSandwich 20 Years · 32917 comments

"This thread has been locked..."

 :) 

3 Likes · 0 Dislikes
volcan 11 Years · 1799 comments

Instead of a tariff the government instead recommends judging Apple with infringement of Qualcomm IP

3 Likes · 0 Dislikes
Mike Wuerthele 9 Years · 6947 comments

"This thread has been locked..."

 :) 

We'll see how it goes. That said, if you're going to comment in here, read the commenting guidelines first. You are being watched, and scores are being kept.

Resist the urge to squabble.

3 Likes · 0 Dislikes
rob53 14 Years · 3341 comments

"This thread has been locked..."

 :) 
We'll see how it goes. That said, if you're going to comment in here, read the commenting guidelines first. You are being watched, and scores are being kept.

Resist the urge to squabble.
@SpamSandwich is ok but he knows others will mess things up. That said I have faith in Tim to do what’s right for  Apple, all Apple customers as well as other tech companies. I just wish the current administration understands the majority of large US companies are
multinational and getting into a trade war hurts all Americans not just foreign countries. 

3 Likes · 0 Dislikes
tallest skil 15 Years · 43086 comments

Before the unconstitutional Federal Reserve was enacted on the day before Christmas Eve 1913, The federal government was funded primarily through tariffs. Seeing as, you know, that’s how to keep a people out of slavery. Since the establishment of the PRIVATE CORPORATION–the federal reserve–the income tax has enslaved all citizens to its usury.

A restoration of tariffs is the first step toward abolishing the Federal Reserve, and consequently the income tax. As such, it should be supported by anyone who isn’t in favor of literal human slavery. Oh, and a reminder that the Romans made usury illegal because whereas even their chattel slavery was time-based, usury is forever.

7 Likes · 0 Dislikes