Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

FCC pauses review of Sprint and T-Mobile merger

Government stops the "shot clock" on the merger's review period, in order to take a look at modeling.

The Federal Communications Commission sent a letter to Sprint and T-Mobile Tuesday informing the carriers that it's pausing the current review of their merger.

"Today we are pausing the Commission's informal 180-day transaction shot clock in this proceeding. Additional time is necessary to allow for thorough staff and third-party review of newly submitted and anticipated modeling relied on by the Applicants," said the letter, signed by David B. Lawrence, head of the T-Mobile/Sprint Transaction Task Force, and Donald Stockdale Chief of the FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.

The new facts requiring review include a revised network engineering model submitted by the parties in early September, the mentioning in a meeting of a T-Mobile business model called "Build 9," which was not reviewed by the FCC until recently and T-Mobile's recent disclosure that it "intends to submit additional economic modeling in support of the Applications, beyond that strictly responsive to the various economic analyses in the Petitions to Deny."

The 180-day clock, the FCC letter said, "will remain stopped until the Applicants have completed the record on which they intend to rely and a reasonable period of time has passed for.staff and third-party review. The Commission will decide whether to extend the deadline for reply comments after receiving the remainder of the Applicants' modeling submissions."

Sprint and T-Mobile announced in April that they had agreed to an all-stock merger worth $26 billion, with T-Mobile CEO John Legere to assume leadership of the combined company, to be called "New T-Mobile." The companies submitted their formal merger request to the FCC in June, in which they vowed to "deliver a robust, nationwide world-class 5G network and services sooner than otherwise possible."



12 Comments

❄️
vukasika 10 Years · 103 comments

Seriously same administration that pushed through tax cuts with hand writing in the margins and wants to push through a Supreme Court nominee without full disclosure of documents, needs extra time to review Sprint/T-Mobile merger. Now that’s hilarious...

🎄
ronn 20 Years · 688 comments

"Additional time is necessary to allow for thorough staff and third-party review of newly submitted and anticipated modeling relied on by the Applicants," said the letter, signed by David B. Lawrence, head of the T-Mobile/Sprint Transaction Task Force, and Donald Stockdale Chief of the FCC's Wireless Telecommunications Bureau.

Foolish of the merger partners to submit additional information months after the application. The government will take up an 
inordinate amount of time and this allows third party to do the same.

🕯️
SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

Anti-monopoly regulations are absurd, outdated concepts. The freer are the markets, the greater will be competition and the lower the odds that businesses and government will collude to stifle and prevent competition.

🌟
kidrock2199 10 Years · 143 comments

This shouldn’t have even gotten this far to begin with. Less competition means higher prices for the consumer. I remember the huge stink the ATT/TMobile merger talks caused back in 2011. Everyone was against that! Now all of a sudden it’s ok for TMobile/Sprint to merge?

Not like I would ever use Sprint or TMobile because they are the crappiest of wireless services in my area, but still. This has the potential to raise prices on AT&T and Verizon’s end. Sprint and TMobile (here at least) are mainly used by low to low/middle income folks while AT&T and Verizon are pricier but provide superior service in much more areas making them a very reliable wireless service provider. 

🎄
BLACK6 7 Years · 3 comments

TMobile needs to make its  Service better  & it’s not  unlimited they need to stop telling that lie.