Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

'The Banker' cast and crew defend Apple TV+ film amid abuse allegations

Anthony Mackie and Samuel L. Jackson in "The Banker."

Last updated

Apple's film 'the Banker' has been defended by its cast and crew as having a 'positive message of empowerment,' in response to a decision to delay the film's release following allegations of sexual abuse from the daughter of the film's subject.

The film was originally scheduled to debut in theaters on December 6, along with a premiere at AFI Fest in November that was pulled at the last minute. The cancelled premiere and delayed release plans were instigated following accusations by Cynthia Garrett, daughter of protagonist Bernard Garrett, claiming there was sexual abuse performed by film producer and her half-brother Bernard Garrett Jr. against her.

A statement signed by a number of key cast members and production crew received by Variety attempts to defend the film's creation, and to distance the work from the allegations.

"Though we have no way of knowing what may have transpired between Mr. Garrett's children in the 1970s, including the allegations of abuse we have recently been made aware of, our hearts go out to anyone who has suffered," the statement reads. It goes on to point out it was based on "recorded interviews with Bernard Garrett Sr himself, conducted in 1995, supported by congressional transcripts, court rulings, and other media articles from the era," and not from the recollections of Garrett Sr's children.

Referencing the "remarkable lives of Bernard Garrett Sr and Joe Morris, and their ground-breaking achievements combatting racial inequality in the 1950s and 60s," the statement ends by insisting "We stand by the film, and its positive message of empowerment."

The statement is signed by 54 people, including writers, heads of departments, ad producers. Heading up the list is George Nolfi, the director, writer, and a producer for the film, with key cast members Anthony Mackie, Samuel L. Jackson, Nicholas Hoult, Nia Long, and others also signing the article.

"The Banker" is based on the true story of two African American businessmen who trained a working class white man to become the figurehead of a successful empire in real estate and banking. Mackie plays Garrett Sr. in the film, with Jackson taking the role of Morris.

It is unclear what Apple's plans are for the film's release following the delayed theatrical debut and premiere failure. While it was slated to be made available on Apple TV+ sometime in 2020, it is unknown when exactly that will be, nor how much of an impact the allegations made to delay its streaming availability.

The statement in full reads:

We set out to tell a story we were very passionate about, recounting the remarkable lives of Bernard Garrett Sr and Joe Morris, and their ground-breaking achievements combating racial inequality in the 1950s and 60s. Though we have no way of knowing what may have transpired between Mr. Garrett's children in the 1970s, including the allegations of abuse we have recently been made aware of, our hearts go out to anyone who has suffered. The film itself is not based on the recollections of any of Bernard Garrett Sr's children, but rather, on recorded interviews with Bernard Garrett Sr himself, conducted in 1995, supported by congressional transcripts, court rulings, and other media articles from the era. We stand by the film, and its positive message of empowerment.



20 Comments

beowulfschmidt 12 Years · 2364 comments

I'm wondering how it feels to be hoist on one's own petard...

Personally, I think if the movie is well written, the message oughta be "Yeah, the guy did bad stuff, but he also did a bunch of good stuff, and that's what we're concentrating on here.  Let he who is without sin cast the first stone, and all that."

But that seems to be a foreign concept these days.

razorpit 17 Years · 1793 comments

I'm wondering how it feels to be hoist on one's own petard...

Personally, I think if the movie is well written, the message oughta be "Yeah, the guy did bad stuff, but he also did a bunch of good stuff, and that's what we're concentrating on here.  Let he who is without sin cast the first stone, and all that."

But that seems to be a foreign concept these days.

Part of the plan. Hold everyone to impossible standards until it all comes crashing down and then we beg for someone to come in and clean up the mess. That person will of course be infallible and will have all of the answers.

Gosh I wish there was more emphasis on early to mid 20th century history in school...

foregoneconclusion 12 Years · 2857 comments

Personally, I think if the movie is well written, the message oughta be "Yeah, the guy did bad stuff, but he also did a bunch of good stuff, and that's what we're concentrating on here.  Let he who is without sin cast the first stone, and all that."

The issue doesn't involve the subject of the film. It involves his son, who is one of the producers.

razorpit said: Part of the plan. Hold everyone to impossible standards until it all comes crashing down and then we beg for someone to come in and clean up the mess. That person will of course be infallible and will have all of the answers.

The accusation involves molestation of family members. Do you consider not molesting family members to be an impossible standard to be held to? 



greg uvan 11 Years · 86 comments

We would all do well to remember the adage, you should never meet your hero. For example, Gandhi probably beat his wife, do we think that's a great idea? No. But he's still Gandhi, and his resolve and his accomplishments are still admirable. 

People are complicated messes. They are admixtures of admirable and shameful characteristics, especially if you bring their entire life under scrutiny. We need to be able to detach the admirable character from the flawed human underneath, and that's what a good story does.

Ultimately, the story isn't about the man and his failings, it's about a character who did something amazing.

AdBrit 8 Years · 7 comments

The issue of abuse is between Cynthia Garrett and her half-brother Bernard Garrett Jr. who also was a film producer on the project. That is where the issue should remain. Others may be empathetic and even sympathetic but cannot be allowed to be culpable and cannot have their efforts and talents voided. Attention and effort must be directed at the two specifics and to do otherwise is to spread the abuse too broadly and too unfairly. The consequence must fall where it belongs. Unfortunately, an element of panic is engendered when accusations of abuse are made and societally we accept blame rather than addressing the specifics. This broad brush painting taints both the guilty and the innocent and simply intensifies the original abuse.