Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Developer says Apple rejected update for not forcing auto-billing on users

Down Dog remains in the App Store

Yoga app developer Down Dog reports that Apple has rejected an update because its free trial version doesn't automatically turn into a paid subscription.

Following the recent App Store dispute over Hey email, another developer is claiming that Apple has rejected an update to its app. This time, it's reportedly specifically because the app offers a free trial, but does use Apple's App Connect service to turn that into an automatically-billing paid subscription.

The tweet's attached screengrab references terms and conditions that developers producing iOS apps must abide. The full documentation says that apps may offer such a free trial, transitioning to a paid one, but it does not appear to mandate it.

The developer goes on to say that it has "experimented with auto-charging trials in the past" and that it's been problematic. "[It leads] to 1) fewer users trying the product... 2) a huge number of refund requests by users who forget to cancel and 3) complete disbelief from those users when we explain that Apple won't allow us to issue refunds."

Apple has yet to comment, and it is not clear why the issue arose over this particular update. However, Down Dog does promote on its website how users can avoid paying more to Apple.

"Purchasing through our website avoids commission fees commonly charged by Apple or Google," says the site, "and will usually get you the best price!"

Down Dog's yoga app is still available in the App Store, and the developer does not say what the latest update was adding or fixing. The existing app continues to offer in-app purchases of various levels of subscription, but the company also offers direct subscriptions via its website.

The company's complaint is similar to one it made in June 2020 regarding Google. Down Dog's yoga app had been removed from the Google Play Store for the same practice of offering subscriptions via its official site. However, Google allowed the app back after an appeal.

"This is all done under the guise of protecting their users," said Down Dog about Google's initial decision to remove the app, "but is clearly a monopolistic attempt to get 30% of our revenue, as is the case when users subscribe via Google."

Separately, Apple has said that it is listening to developers and their concerns about the pricing and management of the App Store.



75 Comments

tenthousandthings 18 Years · 1060 comments


"This is all done under the guise of protecting their users," said Down Dog about Google's initial decision to remove the app, "but is clearly a monopolistic attempt to get 30% of our revenue, as is the case when users subscribe via Google."

I’ve found, in my own experience, if one feels the need to add “clearly” to a statement, then the issue probably isn’t as clear as one would like. If a simple declarative sentence isn’t enough, you should think again about what you’re saying.

4 Likes · 0 Dislikes
dysamoria 13 Years · 3430 comments

I’m absolutely with the developer here, on this issue.

9 Likes · 0 Dislikes
bobolicious 11 Years · 1184 comments

...is this what is left when an operations zeitgeist succeeds a visionary...?

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
sflocal 17 Years · 6142 comments

dysamoria said:
I’m absolutely with the developer here, on this issue.

And I’m firmly in the Apple camp.  Apple is the one doing all the work obtaining and keeping its large base of customers willing to pay for apps.  If 30% is too high given what Apple does they’re more than happy to go to the Android camp, where they probably make zero money.

70% of something is better than 100% of nothing.

whiners.

9 Likes · 0 Dislikes
crowley 16 Years · 10431 comments

It's annoyed me in the past that the default for trial was to auto renew on a paid subscription.  I never knew that it was Apple mandated behaviour.  Pretty shady policy.

8 Likes · 0 Dislikes