Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple approves Hey update, invitations no longer required

Apple has approved a new update to the Hey email app that offers free but temporary service to new users, possibly bringing tensions between the two companies to a close.

Earlier in June, Apple blocked two bug fix updates to the email client and threatened to remove the app because of its lack of in-app purchase options. Hey is a new $99-a-year email app created by the developers of Basecamp.

Now, Hey has pushed out version 1.0.3 of its app, which includes a feature that lets users create a randomized, 14-day "burner" Hey email account for free. Just a few days prior, Apple approved the aforementioned bug fix updates. Hey is also allowing users to sign up for the service without invitations.

The drama between Hey and Apple was sparked due to the email app's lack of an in-app purchase option, violating App Store guidelines and allowing Hey to circumvent Apple's 15% to 30% cut of subscription purchases.

Basecamp co-founder and CTO David Heinemeier Hansson voiced concern over Apple's handling of the situation last week and vowed to fight App Store policies pertaining to revenue sharing. Jason Fried, Basecamp's CEO, took a different approach and maintained that the dispute over Apple's policies is more about customer experience than it is money.

While some apps are able to get away without integrating a path for new users to sign up for service, Apple said that Hey doesn't fall into that "reader" app category. Hey said that it thought it was following Apple's "unwritten rules" for multi-platform, software-as-a-service products.

Apple SVP of Worldwide Marketing Phil Schiller, who is also in charge of App Store operations, had previously suggested that Hey could offer some type of free tier to get its app approved. Despite the controversy, Schiller said that no changes to Apple's in-app purchase policy were coming.

The dustup between Apple and Hey came in the midst of an U.S. Justice Department antitrust probe. The House's antitrust chair even called Apple's cut of subscriptions "highway robbery."



16 Comments

chasm 3620 comments · 10 Years

Surprise! Phil wasn't kidding -- I think Apple was 100 percent in the right on the point that he made: an App Store app should not do nothing if the user doesn't already have a subscription. At least the developer of Hey (who, based on his past, clearly has a persecution complex) completely misinterpreted this as "you must use our subscription model."

This is not to say that Apple handled this perfectly. They didn't, at least not initially. Ultimately, though, the solution was exactly what Apple had actually suggested -- with no compromise on their part, or rule-changing or exception-giving required. They're not even getting a cut. Imagine any other company working this hard to make a client who will never give them a dime of revenue (and has cost them a bundle) happy.

Thankfully, the adult over at Hey (the CEO) managed to get where Apple was coming from, make an incredibly simple change that they should have made from the get-go (a trial period), and oh look -- a win-win for everyone. Now Hey can fail entirely on its own merits (and they will -- their business model is stupid), and Apple can point to the "we listened, we offered a solution agreeable to all, and we'll take their feedback on board going forward" position when the antitrust investigations come calling.

agilealtitude 165 comments · 6 Years

Hey, looks like ‘Hey’ read the app requirements documentation this time.

lam92103 148 comments · 4 Years

IMO this was all just done for PR & marketing reasons. The product manager probably knew what a big flop this is gonna be and just did this for hype.

elijahg 2841 comments · 18 Years

chasm said:
Surprise! Phil wasn't kidding -- I think Apple was 100 percent in the right on the point that he made: an App Store app should not do nothing if the user doesn't already have a subscription.

What about apps are completely non-functional without specific hardware from a vendor? Plenty of those on there.

macplusplus 2116 comments · 9 Years

lam92103 said:
IMO this was all just done for PR & marketing reasons. The product manager probably knew what a big flop this is gonna be and just did this for hype.

Nonsense. It says “free but temporary service”, that makes it a legitimate demo app allowed in the AppStore.