Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Masimo alleges Apple is delaying legal fight to boost Apple Watch market share

Credit: Andrew O'Hara, AppleInsider

Last updated

Medical technology company Masimo is accusing Apple of delaying their patent legal fight in order to sell more Apple Watch models.

Masimo filed a lawsuit in January accusing Apple of infringing on 10 of its patents. It also alleged that Apple promised a working relationship, but turned out to actually stole secrets and poached key employees.

Apple hasn't responded to the allegations, but has moved to dismiss parts of the case and lodged petitions to invalidate Masimo patents. In a court filing spotted by Bloomberg on Tuesday, Masimo claims that the Cupertino tech giant is strategically delaying the trial.

The Cupertino tech giant has petitioned the trial court to keep the case on hold while the trade secret allegations and patent invalidation requests are being considered, a move that it says will narrow the issues at hand and "reduce wasted resources."

But any delay in the trial, Masimo contends, "would allow Apple to on a critical window of opportunity to capture an emerging field. Just as it has done in numerous other markets, Apple seeks to use its considerable resources and ecosystem to capture the market without regard."

Masimo, based in Irvine, Calif., produces and sells various medical sensors and health monitors. In its filing, it said that it fears Apple will use its power to stifle competition to the Apple Watch, including the new blood oxygen sensor-equipped Apple Watch Series 6.

Apple has sold Masimo's products on its online storefront in the past. For example, the MightySat fingertip pulse oximeter was available directly from Apple's website but has since been removed sometime between January and September. Apple does typically remove products from its online store when it's embroiled in legal fights with their manufacturers.

"I have seen reports from consumers and others suggesting that the Series 6 be used as a medical product," Masimo CEO Joe Kiani said in the filing. "Not only will that harm consumers themselves, it will also reduce our opportunities to sell truly clinical-grade products to consumers."

The brief also claims that Apple initially dodged queries about whether future Apple Watch models would have a blood oxygen sensor — one of the patented technologies involved in the original lawsuit. At the time, Apple dismissed those claims as "Internet rumors."

U.S. District Judge James Selna has set a series of dates on the case, with the first hearing to be held in April — unless the delays are done away with sooner.

Updated with information about Apple's decision to remove Masimo's MightySat from its online store.



11 Comments

Beats 3073 comments · 4 Years

I hope this isn't true. Would hate to see Apple use the same scumbag techniques as Microsoft, Google and Samscum.

I wonder what "patents" Apple copied since Apple doesn't make knockoff Masimo products. I don't get their "market share argument in this regard since they aren't in the same market. It's like Coca Cola complaining that Cheerios is taking their market share because they both involve sugar.

"The brief also claims that Apple initially dodged queries about whether future Apple Watch models would have a blood oxygen sensor "

You mean like they do everything? Apple hardly ever reveals features from future products. Sorry Masimo, this isn't uncommon from Apple.

Seems like Masimo is butthurt that employees left them for Apple more than anything.

mac_dog 1084 comments · 16 Years

Well, Apple can’t claim that it’s a medical product, unless it has an FDA approval (unlikely), so that argument falls apart. 

EsquireCats 1268 comments · 8 Years

The sensors in the Apple Watch aren’t unique, but they attract these patent lawsuits, one may recall apple also successfully fended off a lawsuit regarding the photoplethysmogram feature (heart rate sensor.)

These concepts aren’t new, and there is an abundance of prior art for each. Apple’s challenge has mostly been building wrist-borne accuracy and regulatory related hurdles.

entropys 4316 comments · 13 Years

In other news Ferrari sues Ford for manufacturing transportation devices that do a similar job.

this Suit basically says Apple has produced a good enough product to take market share away from me. Market share they don’t seem to have anyway.

verne arase 479 comments · 11 Years

The sensors in the Apple Watch aren’t unique, but they attract these patent lawsuits, one may recall apple also successfully fended off a lawsuit regarding the photoplethysmogram feature (heart rate sensor.)

These concepts aren’t new, and there is an abundance of prior art for each. Apple’s challenge has mostly been building wrist-borne accuracy and regulatory related hurdles.

As Apple grows larger, you can expect more and more of these lawsuits to accumulate. Everyone thinks they've been damaged by the behemoth, and everyone wants to collect a portion of that pie.

Take a look at Koss - a headphone maker - suing Apple for God-knows-what Bluetooth technology.

Why go after Apple?

Advise of the lawyers: Go where the money is.