Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple's M1 MacBook Air smashes Windows on ARM in new benchmarks

A benchmark test published on Tuesday shows a massive performance gap between Mac computers powered by Apple's M1 chip and Windows on ARM machines running the latest 64-bit x86 apps via an official emulator.

Conducted by PCWorld, the evaluation pits a Microsoft Surface Pro X against the new M1 MacBook Air, two devices that incorporate ARM processors.

As noted by the publication, there are precious few ARM-based Windows boxes from which to choose as only two chips — Qualcomm's Snapdragon 8cx and Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 — power the platform. Microsoft's derivative SQ1 and SQ2 processors, designed in partnership with Qualcomm, are in the Surface Pro X.

PCWorld's Windows testbed relied on a first-generation SQ1, though any gains derived from the more recent SQ2 are thought to be insignificant.

The MacBook Air crushed the Surface Pro X in both single- and multi-score Geekbench 5 testing. Apple's new laptop scored 1730 points in the single-core process, beating Surface's score by just over 1000 points. Multi-core testing revealed an even larger disparity, with MacBook Air clocking 7454 points to Surface's 2734 points.

Results from Maxon's Cinebench also gave the M1 a commanding lead with single- and multi-core scores landing at 1496 and 6838, respectively, handily beating Surface Pro X's 371 and 1604.

Moving on to open source video transcoding tool Handbrake, MacBook Air finished transcoding a 12-minute 4K video into a 1080p H.265 file six times faster than the Surface.

It should be noted that Microsoft's 64-bit x86 emulator is still in beta. Still, even with a concerted software development effort, Windows on ARM lacks the hardware chops to catch up with Apple's macOS and M1 integration.

The first in an expected line of in-house designed Mac chips, the M1 debuted in November and currently powers the new MacBook Air, 13-inch MacBook Pro and Mac mini. Early benchmarks, and AppleInsider's own reviews, have revealed blazing compute speeds and extremely high levels of power efficiency compared to legacy Intel models.

With high performance chip designs on the horizon, Apple Silicon could soon represent a paradigm shift in personal computing.



21 Comments

chadbag 13 Years · 2029 comments

We’re the Mac benchmark tests running under Rosetta 2 ?   If you run the Windows on Arm under x86 emulation you should at least compare oranges to oranges and run x86 Mac versions under Rosetta 

22july2013 11 Years · 3736 comments

chadbag said:
We’re the Mac benchmark tests running under Rosetta 2 ?   If you run the Windows on Arm under x86 emulation you should at least compare oranges to oranges and run x86 Mac versions under Rosetta 

It took me a minute to get your point. Your point is very good, although I would rather see Windows apps recompiled for Windows on ARM so we can get an "Apples to apples" comparison. Who really cares about emulated app comparisons when we can compare native apps instead?

Surely there are some native apps for Windows for ARM. How about Microsoft Office which just announced support for M1 Macs today. Is there a Microsoft Office for Windows for ARM yet? That would be a pretty good comparison.

🎅
inexco 12 Years · 11 comments

To me the headline implied running Windows on the Air.
I was expecting to see Parallels or another emulator running Windows better.
My 2012 Mini runs Windows better than most dedicated Windows machines.

🎄
skingers 15 Years · 32 comments

chadbag said:
We’re the Mac benchmark tests running under Rosetta 2 ?   If you run the Windows on Arm under x86 emulation you should at least compare oranges to oranges and run x86 Mac versions under Rosetta 

Yes good point this is an imperfect comparison for sure.  I imagine the gulf of performance is a combination of M1 hardware over the "Qualsoft" chips and, I bet, the even more significant edge of Rosetta 2 over however MS is emulating X86 under Windows ARM.

🎄
cpsro 14 Years · 3239 comments

Even if the M1 is running Rosetta 2, Windows is hamstrung here by emulating X86. IIRC Microsoft will be releasing an X64 emulator soon. Then compare Rosetta 2’s X64 emulation to the new MS X64 emulator.
UPDATE: the PCWorld comparison used the new (beta) emulator.😳