Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Spotify HiFi one-ups Apple Music with lossless audio streams

Spotify is preparing to offer higher quality music streams to subscribers in a number of markets, with Spotify HiFi set to offer lossless audio, a feature currently not available on Apple Music.

In its ongoing bid to fend off Apple's competing streaming service, Spotify used its Stream On virtual event on Monday to launch a new feature. Spotify HiFi will provide users with a CD-quality, lossless audio format.

Streamable via the Spotify app and through Spotify Connect-enabled speakers, the service will be an opt-in upgrade for Premium subscribers. Free-tier users will have to subscribe to listen to the higher-quality streams.

According to Spotify, the HiFi addition will let users "listen to their favorite songs the way artists intended," and that it was "consistently one of the most requested new features" of the service.

Spotify is working with "some of the world's biggest speaker manufacturers" to add Spotify HiFi support through Spotify Connect. The add-on will also be part of a "seamless music experience," namely for users to listen to the HiFi streams however they want.

Spotify HiFi will be made available in "select markets" later in 2021. More information on its availability will be offered by Spotify "soon."

The move could potentially give Spotify an advantage over Apple Music, which currently does not provide lossless music streams to its subscribers. It will also bring Spotify in line with Tidal, which has provided lossless audio streaming and "master-quality" tracks for some time.

However, the benefits of the Spotify HiFi service may not necessarily be noticed by all users.

The Pono music player and service, championed by legendary rocker Neil Young, was a short-lived attempt to provide audiophile-quality sound to its users. However, blind audio tests in 2015 found that people couldn't really tell the difference between the PonoPlayer and an iPhone.



29 Comments

mknelson 1148 comments · 9 Years

The Pono music player and service, championed by legendary rocker Neil Young, was a short-lived attempt to provide audiophile-quality sound to its users. However, blind audio tests in 2015 found that people couldn't really tell the difference between the PonoPlayer and an iPhone.

Lossless, it's the "organic" for Audiophiles.

winstoner71 117 comments · 7 Years

I’m an avowed AM user (I do have several streaming accounts including Spotify and Qobuz), and this is admittedly a gamechanger. Looking forward to it...and when AM finally decided to do it and make it better. 

spheric 2705 comments · 9 Years

Well, since I was really rather surprised at how terrible Spotify sounds even at highest quality, this is...good news? 

Appleish 717 comments · 8 Years

mknelson said:
The Pono music player and service, championed by legendary rocker Neil Young, was a short-lived attempt to provide audiophile-quality sound to its users. However, blind audio tests in 2015 found that people couldn't really tell the difference between the PonoPlayer and an iPhone.
Lossless, it's the "organic" for Audiophiles.

Exactly. Apple Music's AAC format sounds better than any other 'non-organic' service.  I dabbled in hi-res files. Tried expensive cans and a dedicated headphone amp. Not worth the bother. If Apple ever launches a lossless tier, it will only be if they calculate that they can make a profit off of people who clearly have better ears than us normals. I upped my game with a set of AirPods Max. I'm good.

zimmie 651 comments · 9 Years

mknelson said:
The Pono music player and service, championed by legendary rocker Neil Young, was a short-lived attempt to provide audiophile-quality sound to its users. However, blind audio tests in 2015 found that people couldn't really tell the difference between the PonoPlayer and an iPhone.
Lossless, it's the "organic" for Audiophiles.

"Organic" at least means Monsanto wasn't involved in making the food. I do find it terribly amusing that one of the allowed "organic" pesticides is cobalt, though. It's one of the few inorganic pesticides available. Most others are consumer-grade chemical or biological weapons.

Admittedly, psychoacoustics is not my specialty. Last I had heard, though, nobody had yet demonstrated the ability to distinguish lossless from 256 kbit AAC in ABX testing, let alone in double-blind. Seems like a great way to waste a lot of network throughput and battery power.