Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple facing earnings headwind from proposed tax rate changes, analyst says

Investment bank JP Morgan believes that several proposed tax rate changes could "almost completely" reverse the benefits of prior tax reductions for Apple.

In a note to investors seen by AppleInsider, lead analyst Samik Chatterjee analyzes how proposed increases in the statutory federal tax rate and the global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI) under the Biden Administration could prove to be earnings headwinds for Apple.

The analyst estimates that the combination of an increase in domestic taxes from 21% to 28% and an increase in foreign taxes from 21% could potentially offset the benefit for the Cupertino tech giant from the reduced statutory tax rate between 2017 and 2020.

Back in 2017, the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate was lowered from 35% to 21%. However, some of that benefit was moderated by the addition of a higher minimum tax rate on foreign income.

"With the statutory rate expected to go up by almost half of the amount that it was lowered by, we envision the effective tax rate for the company is likely going to increase about half of the decline that it benefitted from — on a stand-alone basis," Chatterjee writes.

Additionally, there's a proposal to double the GILTI, which is a new tax concept introduced by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It created a new category of foreign income that gets added to corporate taxable income each calendar year.

With the proposed changes, Chatterjee says companies will no longer be able to average out tax across high-tax and low-tax jurisdictions to take advantage of reduction in credits for foreign taxes paid. He says the foreign tax rate for Apple could hit 21% in low-tax areas and 26% in high-tax regions, up from the single digits currently.

All in all, both factors could almost completely reverse the benefits to the tax rate that Apple has experienced over the past few years, the analyst says. The proposed changes to GILTI will contribute about half of the headwind, while the statutory tax rate would make up the other half.

Chatterjee points out that his estimates are based on a simplistic assumption of the impact of the tax rate changes. However, he notes that the complexity of taxable income calculations and legal structures could result in a very different number.

The analyst maintains his 2021 iPhone forecast and 12-month AAPL price target of $150. The price target is based on a Dec. 2022 earnings-per-share estimate of $4.96 and a blended P/E multiple of around 30x.



4 Comments

GeorgeBMac 8 Years · 11421 comments

Ok ... well, somebody's gotta pay the bills...
The Trump tax cuts produced a perpetual, never ending, Trillion $ deficit.  That's unsustainable.  It was a mistake that need to be fixed.  Meanwhile, the U.S. is not only operating on borrowed and printed money but it's infrastructure is not only falling apart physically but becoming increasingly obsolete.

Time to pay our bills, invest in ourselves and move on to the future.

foregoneconclusion 12 Years · 2857 comments

Oh no, they'll have to somewhat reduce their stock buybacks. What a calamity...

docno42 16 Years · 3761 comments

The Trump tax cuts produced a perpetual, never ending, Trillion $ deficit. 

lol - government spending is so out of countriil you can confiscate all the money from those evil billionaires and it won’t even get close. 


here’s a radical thought - how about spending less?  Especially on pork like foreign side were a healthy chunk manages to find its way back to politicians (usually through family), the rest to the elites in the countries it’s supposed to “help” and zero to where most people assume the “aid” goes. 

But see, you have to pay attention and that’s hard.  It’s far easier to demonize the “other” side, throw around bullshit terms like “invest” to keep the feels. Facing reality takes far more work. 

GeorgeBMac 8 Years · 11421 comments

docno42 said:
The Trump tax cuts produced a perpetual, never ending, Trillion $ deficit. 
lol - government spending is so out of countriil you can confiscate all the money from those evil billionaires and it won’t even get close. 
here’s a radical thought - how about spending less?  Especially on pork like foreign side were a healthy chunk manages to find its way back to politicians (usually through family), the rest to the elites in the countries it’s supposed to “help” and zero to where most people assume the “aid” goes. 

But see, you have to pay attention and that’s hard.  It’s far easier to demonize the “other” side, throw around bullshit terms like “invest” to keep the feels. Facing reality takes far more work. 

Sorry, we tried your trickle down nonsense.  It failed.