Mike Peterson
Vybe Together, an app that was pulled from the App Store for promoting large parties during the coronavirus pandemic, has appealed its removal.
The app, which was relatively obscure, gained hype last year for promoting and encouraging users to join "secret gatherings" — including "ragers" on New Year's Eve. It was ultimately removed from the App Store in late 2020.
Now, Vybe Together COO Itamar Gil says the company is appealing Apple's decision to remove the app because it believes it was rejected for political reasons.
In an update to its developer guidelines on Monday, Apple added new options to its App Review contact form, which developers can use to appeal app rejections. One of those options is the ability for a developer to specify whether they believe their app was rejected due to unfair treatment, such as because of political bias.
Gil said that the removal of Vybe Together was political in nature because Apple "overridden state boundaries" and chose to be "politically correct." The company said in a statement that it believes its app was removed because it was "potentially harmful to Apple's public image."
"With that said, we think that Apple as a monopoly owes the people the right to choose for themselves; in Vybe's case they made a decision for the Public, acting as the judge and the prosecutor without our ability to defend ourselves," the company said.
Apple pulled Vybe Together shortly after media coverage highlighted a TikTok video that promoted large parties during New Year's Eve 2020. TikTok disabled the company's account, and Apple shortly followed suit.
Vybe Together says Apple hasn't let the app return to the App Store since its removal.
In a statement to AppleInsider, Apple said it removed Vybe Together because it promoted reckless behavior and that politics had no bearing on the decision. In addition to possibly endangering public health and safety during the pandemic, it also violated emergency public health orders. Apple says the behavior violated guidelines 1.4.5 and 1.1.
It still isn't clear why Apple removed Vybe Together. The company's developer guidelines do ban apps that "urge customers to participate in activities ... in a way that risks physical harm to themselves or others."
Update on Friday, June 11: Updated with statement from Apple and Vybe Together.
Follow all of WWDC 2021 with comprehensive AppleInsider coverage of the week-long event from June 7 through June 11, including details on iOS 15, iPadOS 15, watchOS 8, macOS Monterey and more.
Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get the latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.
-m.jpg)
Charles Martin
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
Malcolm Owen
Andrew Orr
William Gallagher
Sponsored Content
17 Comments
It’s called Public Health!! It’s not political. Your company endangered thousands with your reckless promotion of illegal parties during a pandemic! Be happy that you didn’t have more significant consequences. You clearly demonstrated your disregard for public health. Nice try with the Monopoly BS. Enjoy life stuck on Android and find some ethics
basically and fundamentally I’m someone who tries to be on the side of free speech and opening liberty for all. However, there are a lot of people out there who behave in ways they will get them killed , and I try not to judge that. However when people behave in ways that are likely to cause a lot of other people to get killed. That’s where we have to draw the line. It’s that simple.
(… unless zxzxxx is up on the stage at the theater and several audience members have guns that are loaded… LOL I didn’t just say that did I? Redact redact redact. I really don’t mean that negative imagery in any real fashion. Please excuse. Just being exemplary and devastating and we all have good about us.)
1. Yes it probably was political as was much of the COVID-19 response. Government authoritarianism people’s private lives is not something to support.