Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Australia bank CEO mocks Apple's claim of being pro-competition

Adding a credit card to Apple Pay

The head of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia has ridiculed Apple for its claim to be pro-competition in its dealings over Apple Pay in the country.

Australia's antitrust regulator is considering requiring Apple to support rivals to Apple Pay. Now Matt Comyn, CEO of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia, has accused Apple of being anticompetitive.

According to Reuters, Comyn told a parliamentary committee that he believes lawmakers should boost their scrutiny of Apple and other technology giants.

"[The] claim that Apple is pro-competition, I think, is a fair statement," Comyn said, "as long as one accepts that competition is welcome as long as no one can compete with Apple."

"It is analogous to imagine a world today where, on your Apple phone, the only person that could determine which carrier you used is Apple," he continued.

Speaking to the same committee, Shayne Elliott of the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, disagreed with Comyn.

"It's kind of ironic," Elliott said, "one of Australia's biggest companies complaining about having to deal with other big competitors."

The discussions with the parliamentary committee come as the Australian government reportedly wants to reclassify technology firms as payment systems. The intention is to then apply the latter classification's more strict regulatory controls.



10 Comments

22july2013 11 Years · 3736 comments

Does Comyn think it's anticompetitive to allow only one operating system on the iPhone? Why or why not?

entropys 13 Years · 4316 comments

That’s pretty rich coming from the CEO of one of the big four banks.


"It is analogous to imagine a world today where, on your Apple phone, the only person that could determine which carrier you used is Apple," he continued.

I don’t think that is a meaningful analogy. Besides, I seem to remember certain banks wanting to collude in not adopting Apple Pay and force customers to only use their own version, which of course wasn’t as good.  

Japhey 6 Years · 1772 comments

entropys said:
That’s pretty rich coming from the CEO of one of the big four banks.


"It is analogous to imagine a world today where, on your Apple phone, the only person that could determine which carrier you used is Apple," he continued.

I don’t think that is a meaningful analogy. Besides, I seem to remember certain banks wanting to collude in not adopting Apple Pay and force customers to only use their own version, which of course wasn’t as good.  

There were a couple different ones, but the only one I can think of right now is CurrentC. The market spoke and it crashed and burned. It’s a ridiculous analogy. 

crowley 15 Years · 10431 comments

You can compete with Apple Pay by supporting Google/Samsung Pay on Android, and by issuing contactless credit/debit cards.  I often find myself on the opposite side from Apple in these issues, but this one just shrieks of massively monied men whining that they can't get all the money, and fuck that.

MacPro 18 Years · 19845 comments

I'd add to all the above comments, he should not confuse Apple's dislike of its IP being ripped off with being competed with. He should also check for how well it has worked out for those that mocked Apple in the past.