Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

UK probes Apple, Google over concerns they're endangering children

Apple and Google are among dozens of technology companies that are being investigated by the UK data protection regulator following allegations that they were endangering children online.

The Office of the Information Commissioner on Wednesday announced that it reached out to 40 companies across the social media, gaming, or video and music streaming industries to investigate how they interacted with children, The Financial Times has reported.

Some of the areas the office is probing includes personalizing content and advertising, tracking locations, and behavioral nudges like automatically playing videos.

"We are focusing our interventions on...online services where there is information which indicates potential poor compliance with privacy requirements, and where there is a high risk of potential harm to children," said Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham.

Apple and Google weren't among the original companies contacted in the probe back in August, but are included now.

The probe stems from an investigation conducted by a children's digital rights charity back in October. That group, 5Rights Foundation, alleged that a number of companies were systematically endangering children.

As far as Apple and Google, the group found that they did not do enough to prevent underaged users from downloading age-inappropriate apps. For example, the report says that app stores that have age ratings for apps are apparently inconsistent with an app's age bar. In some cases, apps have no age ratings at all.

Denham said she contacted seven additional companies in the charity's report, but did not disclose their names.

The Information Commissioner's Office could take formal action based on the probe in the spring of 2022, depending on when it analyzes the findings of its investigation.

Back in August, new regulations for children came in effect in the U.K. The Age Appropriate Design Code outlines how companies should protect children online, and breaches of the rules carry the same penalties as the General Data Protection Regulation.



5 Comments

davgreg 9 Years · 1050 comments

Parenting is not the job of Apple, Google or any other company.

This is a non-issue pushed by nanny state types. If you have a concern about what your children see online maybe you should use parental controls, restrict or limit online access or maybe keep screen time to supervised only.

baconstang 10 Years · 1160 comments

davgreg said:
Parenting is not the job of Apple, Google or any other company.

This is a non-issue pushed by nanny state types. If you have a concern about what your children see online maybe you should use parental controls, restrict or limit online access or maybe keep screen time to supervised only.
Or you could start respecting the fact that different people set up their governments the way they see fit and experiment in the way they want. And without resorting to ad hominem attacks on concerned citizens and parents who’ve elected representatives to try to meet those concerns.

My personal experience is that most people want solutions to issues that empirically work, not political philosophy rooted in magical thinking about how people ought to live or behave. (Which includes notions of how to parent — something that’s constantly changing and evolving along with human society.)

If the parents can't figure out how to 'parent' how are tech companies?
They can only provide tools.

elijahg 18 Years · 2842 comments

davgreg said:
Parenting is not the job of Apple, Google or any other company.

This is a non-issue pushed by nanny state types. If you have a concern about what your children see online maybe you should use parental controls, restrict or limit online access or maybe keep screen time to supervised only.
Or you could start respecting the fact that different people set up their governments the way they see fit and experiment in the way they want. And without resorting to ad hominem attacks on concerned citizens and parents who’ve elected representatives to try to meet those concerns.

My personal experience is that most people want solutions to issues that empirically work, not political philosophy rooted in magical thinking about how people ought to live or behave. (Which includes notions of how to parent — something that’s constantly changing and evolving along with human society.)

There is a solution to this which empirically works without the involvement of Apple, Google or your ISP (another failed attempt to "protect the children" was to block porn unless people went to a physical shop to authorise it!?!?! which was laughed out of the commons). That is to watch your own children when you give them access to the internet, and use the already built-in restrictions to limit what your child can see. If you don't know how to do that, then don't give the child the internet connected device. It's up to parents to ensure their children are seat-belted in their car, should the car manufacturer be responsible if the parent crashes and the child was injured due to no seat belt? Of course not. That's the parent's fault, just like it's the parent's fault for letting their child access the unfiltered internet.

The current trend to blame the behaviour and actions of children on anything but the parents is a big part of the problems of today's society. Parents shouldn't be responsible for their own children, apparently.

davgreg 9 Years · 1050 comments

davgreg said:
Parenting is not the job of Apple, Google or any other company.

This is a non-issue pushed by nanny state types. If you have a concern about what your children see online maybe you should use parental controls, restrict or limit online access or maybe keep screen time to supervised only.
Or you could start respecting the fact that different people set up their governments the way they see fit and experiment in the way they want. And without resorting to ad hominem attacks on concerned citizens and parents who’ve elected representatives to try to meet those concerns.

My personal experience is that most people want solutions to issues that empirically work, not political philosophy rooted in magical thinking about how people ought to live or behave. (Which includes notions of how to parent — something that’s constantly changing and evolving along with human society.)

That was not an ad hominem attack, it was simply a statement that parenting is the job of parents or legal guardians - not technology companies.

There will never be an “iParent” app on your devices so you can mail it in.