Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

'Twitter for iPhone' label getting killed will spoil everybody's fun

Last updated

It's the end of an era: now celebrities can pretend to enthuse about Android and not have the words "Twitter for iPhone" undermine their message. Here are some of the greatest hits over the years.

It's not the biggest change Twitter has seen since Elon Musk took over — it's harmless next to the verification debacle, and of course trivial next to the mass layoffs. But removing the line that says what device a tweet was tweeted from is the end for years of entertainment.

"Literally no one even knows why we did that," says Musk, proving that sometimes you just need to ask aloud. While it was never a perfect guide, the fact that this line would make it clear what device was being used would actually help users spot bots.

They tended to use web apps instead of iPhone or Android. And then in 2012 when Twitter was doing its best to rid the world of third-party Twitter clients, it removed the line, possibly to hide how many such apps were being used.

Aside from around 2012 to about 2018 when the feature wasn't available, it has given the world the pleasure of seeing this one line undo perhaps millions of dollars in marketing spend.

Apple's rivals

There will surely be no one celebrating the death of this device line more than Samsung. Apple's largest rival in smartphones has made the mistake so often that it must surely be drummed in to every new PR person.

Samsung iPhone Tweet

Just not very effectively. And so this little "Twitter from iPhone" line has shone out from tweets far more brightly than Samsung's messages about, say, its Galaxy Unpacked event.

Or the time that T-Mobile's CEO enthused about the Samsung Note 3 and nobody believed him, because of that line.

But then a key reason Samsung must be the most relieved group around is that the other groups aren't around. Blackberry is gone, and it can't be because of "Twitter from iPhone," but that didn't help.

To be fair, celebrity creative director at Blackberry, Alicia Keys did claim after tweeting from her iPhone that her account had been hacked.

Huawei spent some cash hiring actor Gal Godot to enthuse about their phones, and that didn't go well either. In that case, her "Twitter from iPhone" message was deleted and reposted from an Android phone instead.

There are countless more examples, including people such as Oprah Winfrey hawking the Microsoft Surface from an iPad. Or Indian star Anushka Sharma endorsing the Google Pixel 2XL — with an iPhone

Whole countries get in on the act

Usually, then, what happens is that a company wants to have its wares enthused about, and they get it wrong. Just once in a while, though, the anti-iPhone nature of the tweet is more about politics than sales.

In 2013, for instance, China's state media went off on one about consumer rights, and amongst other things, claimed Apple was biased against the country.

Yes.

Nations did it, companies did it, celebrities did it — and now no one can even deliberately show they're using an iPhone.

That said, this is an Elon Musk decision so by the time you've read this far, it could all be back.



10 Comments

muthuk_vanalingam 8 Years · 1371 comments

So, Apple won't get free advertising through Twitter. If they have to get this feature added, they have to pay Twitter for the previlege. Sounds right to me.

mac_dog 16 Years · 1084 comments

His grammar sucks. He used “literally” incorrectly. 

mikethemartian 18 Years · 1493 comments

I’m sure he will be happy to put it back if Apple pays him.

JFC_PA 7 Years · 947 comments

sAd. 

from my iPhone 14 Pro Max. 

9secondkox2 8 Years · 3148 comments

mac_dog said:
His grammar sucks. He used “literally” incorrectly. 

Actually, he was correct in its usage. The term “no one” is often not literal and often is used to communicate “not many people” or “a minority of people.”

when he states “literally,” he meant exactly or that he could find literally no person who knew the rationale behind that service. As head of Twitter, he asked around and “no one” could answer. 


In fact even if he weren’t truly being literal, the word “literally” could be used for emphasis and still be grammatically correct. 

So his word usage was correct. I’m f you’re going to correct, it helps to be right.