Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Retail store staff accuse Apple UK of illegal union busting efforts

Apple Birmingham, just one of the company's 40 stores in the UK

Apple Store UK staff claim that company management are coming as close to threatening disciplinary action against union staff as it can.

Apple Glasgow became the first UK Apple Store to formally unionize, and to have that union recognized by Apple. That's proved to be far from a sign that Apple is backtracking on its controversial and illegal anti-union policies, though.

According to ComputerWeekly, members of the UK's United Tech and Allied Workers (UTAW) group, say Apple management has an orchestrated series of anti-union measures.

"A lot of it's about spreading disinformation about unions while at work," said one anonymous Apple employee, "restricting the actions of unions in the workplace, and then trying to slow every process to do with unions down to make the union look like it's not performing."

"For example," he or she continued, "lots of employees in the UK have been told that the union is lying to them and... is promising things it won't be able to deliver, or that 'unions aren't right for Apple'."

"It's a very predictable script that comes from management," said the employee, "and we see the same sort of 'catchphrases' repeated again and again in different locations, so we're very aware it's a script and share it with each other."

According to UTAW organizer Eran Cohen, Apple's anti-union measures go beyond this "passive-aggressive" approach. "[They] have a few different mechanisms for chilling discussions at the store," said Cohen, "so that people are scared to just talk about unions or to ask questions."

The anonymous worker said that if workers are caught discussing unions, management refers them to Apple's "solicitation and distribution" policy, which is meant to prevent employees campaigning for political causes.

Implied threats

"They'll threaten people, they'll pull them into the office and make it sound like there's going to be a serious situation if they keep doing this," continued the employee. "[There's] an implied threat of disciplinary action, there's an implied threat that you might lose your job if you continue with it."

"It's almost certainly against the law," says the employee, who adds that Apple management is "very, very careful" about exactly how they discuss the solicitation policy. He or she says this is so that they can't be accused of directly stopping anyone unionizing.

Cohen points out that the right to join a union is protected under UK law. "[So the] policy is not enforceable because as soon as they tried to discipline someone for it," said Cohen, "they will be in breach of the law."

"But what they can do," he continued, "is imply heavily to people that they will get in trouble, to chill union talks that way."

Apple's response

An Apple spokesperson gave ComputerWeekly a version of its standard response to anti-union accusations.

"We have long been committed to providing an excellent experience for our customers and teams," said the spokesperson. "Apple is one of the highest paying retailers in the UK, and we've regularly made enhancements to our industry-leading benefits as a part of the overall support we provide to our valued team members."

Apple's head of retail, Deirdre O'Brien, has previously said that the company has an "open and collaborative and direct engagement" with its staff, which would be "fundamentally changed" if stores unionized.

"And I worry about what it would mean to put another organization in the middle of our relationship," she said to staff. "An organization that doesn't have a deep understanding of Apple or our business, and most importantly, one that I do not believe shares our commitment to you."

Repeatedly, however, staff have complained that there has not been an "open and collaborative" relationship that includes any "direct engagement" between Apple and its staff.

According to one long-term US employee of the company, telling Apple of an issue is "like writing a letter to Santa" for all the good it does.



5 Comments

red oak 1104 comments · 13 Years

You know what is missing in this article?    Any specific examples.  And, specifics of what is UK law allows and does not allow re:  recruiting for union membership on premises during working hours 

Zero specifics.  All general complaints 

9secondkox2 3148 comments · 8 Years

Translation:

Some folks who want to be in a union are mad that apple doesn’t want to work with mobster style unions. 

Too bad so sad. Unions suck. The only people unions are good for is the people running the union. You should see the bankrolls of these folks. Don’t forget to pay your dues! 

22july2013 3736 comments · 11 Years

I don't dislike (or like) unions, at least not until I read the text of the specific agreement between the union and management. I used Google and found the union's website. I also found their X/Twitter website:

https://arwu.org.uk/ 
https://twitter.com/arwunion?lang=en

After reading these sites, I found that the union claimed they came to a contractual agreement last month with Apple that gave "most employees a 7% raise." I couldn't find the agreement. Most unions that I know about publish their agreements online (...it's really hard to keep those things a secret since every employee can read it.) AppleInisider should provide a link to the agreement so we can get informed.

One thing I don't like about this union is that they think it's funny to post a comic of Apple managers murdering another Apple manager for considering working with the union. Is that kind of online material even legal in the UK, where you can be jailed just for having silent prayer? And does Twitter allow that kind of promotion of workplace violence? (I really don't know.)

Calvin_Hobbes 18 comments · 1 Year

Unions are lying to employees and promising things they can't deliver? You don't say!!!

Unions don't give a rat's a$$ about the worker. In the end, it's all about the endless cash flow of dues. And guess where the money ends up.

Once the union gets in, it will extort the employer with the threat of a walkout which ironically will be illegal to prevent (made worse by the illegality of replacing striking employees with new ones who recognize a pretty sweet deal when they see it). So the union has the employees and employer over the proverbial barrel.

Gad, I would hate to be an employer.

Hedware 99 comments · 3 Years

Unions are lying to employees and promising things they can't deliver? You don't say!!!

Unions don't give a rat's a$$ about the worker. In the end, it's all about the endless cash flow of dues. And guess where the money ends up.

Once the union gets in, it will extort the employer with the threat of a walkout which ironically will be illegal to prevent (made worse by the illegality of replacing striking employees with new ones who recognize a pretty sweet deal when they see it). So the union has the employees and employer over the proverbial barrel.

Gad, I would hate to be an employer.

Yes bring back slavery, but then you would want less for slaves.