Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple Watch ban back on, court denies Apple's appeal to keep it on the market

Apple Watch Series 9 (left) and Apple Watch Ultra (right)

Last updated

The Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 ban will start again on January 18 at 5 PM ET, and will remain banned until the appeal has concluded.

Apple's bid to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to keep the Apple Watch as-is on the market has failed. As a result, the Apple Watch sales and import ban resumes imminently.

To work around the ban, Apple has devised a software patch, which disables the feature. It's not yet clear if this will apply to every Apple Watch on the market, but preliminary indication are that it will only apply to devices it imports and sells.

On December 25, an ITC order banned the import and sale of Apple Watch models that infringed on patents owned by Masimo, preventing their sale in the United States. On Wednesday, Apple managed to secure a reprieve.

In an appeals court win on December 27, Apple managed to convince the court to delay the import ban, effectively allowing the sale of the wearable devices in the United States once again.

Apple filed the motion on December 26, citing the potential "irreparable harm" to its business. December 26 was the earliest opportunity for Apple, as it had to wait until after the 60-day White House review window elapsed on December 25.

Third-party retailers who sell the Apple Watch remain unaffected, though they will have to depend on existing stock on hand for the moment.

In 2020, medical firm Masimo filed a lawsuit against Apple in the U.S. District Court, alleging that the blood pulse oximeter in the Apple Watch violated patents and that Apple had stolen trade secrets. In 2021, this was followed by a filing with the U.S. International Trade Commission.

The Apple Watch ban revolves around its blood oxygen health feature The Apple Watch ban revolves around its blood oxygen health feature

Masimo accused Apple of unfairly copying its products' blood oxygen sensing feature.

Masimo also reasoned the U.S. public would not be affected by an Apple Watch import ban as the sensor isn't "essential to the public health or welfare." This was due to Apple's warnings in fine print that the measurements from the sensor should not be relied upon for medical purposes.

Although the District Court trial was declared a mistrial and did not resume, the ITC ruled in favor of Masimo in January.

On October 26, the ITC issued an order preventing Apple from importing any Apple Watch models that violated Masimo's patents following a complete review. This decision triggered a 60-day review period for the White House.

On December 18, Apple announced that it would stop selling the Apple Watch Series 9 and Apple Watch Ultra 2 in the United States. Online sales were halted on December 21, and Apple Store sales were paused on December 24.

Apple tried to stop the ban by filing a motion for a stay of execution, but on December 20, the ITC denied it. The ITC ban was set to begin on December 25.

The White House confirmed on December 19 that it was monitoring the potential ban, but it didn't intervene and allowed the ITC ban to commence as ordered.



20 Comments

deckert63 5 comments · New User

Is Masimo a real healthcare technology firm or are they a patent troll? If the former, not sure why apple doesn’t pay them the license fees like they do Qualcomm. If the latter, may Masimo rot in special place in hell only reserved for patent trolls. 

kkapoor 26 comments · 19 Years

deckert63 said:
Is Masimo a real healthcare technology firm or are they a patent troll? If the former, not sure why apple doesn’t pay them the license fees like they do Qualcomm. If the latter, may Masimo rot in special place in hell only reserved for patent trolls. 

They are a real company and their claim against Apple is legitimate.

neoncat 165 comments · 5 Years

deckert63 said:
Is Masimo a real healthcare technology firm or are they a patent troll? If the former, not sure why apple doesn’t pay them the license fees like they do Qualcomm. If the latter, may Masimo rot in special place in hell only reserved for patent trolls. 

The tale is an interesting read, you'd do yourself a favor to at least Google a basic summary of what has happened and why. It involves Apple poaching employees from Masimo, one employee in particular lobbying Apple for a job, said employee only lasting a short time, and Apple bringing a pulse ox measurement device to market much faster than would normally have been expected given the complexity of the technology.

One does genuinely wonder, however, what Apple's end game is. They get into these situations where they become so convinced of their own piety they tend to ride the train straight to hell instead of looking for a convenient and practical way to get off. A little humility and less hubris would serve Apple well as a brand and as a company.

eriamjh 1771 comments · 17 Years

Well, well… how the turn tables.

Apple will find a way but it will take until watch 10 or 11.   No quick fix here.