Never miss an update Follow AppleInsider
Tuesday, November 15, 2011, 02:18 am
Samsung obtains March 2012 hearing against Apple in Australian patent case
Samsung has successfully obtained a full hearing with an Australian court for its patent case against rival Apple's iPhone 4S, with the hearing scheduled to take place in March 2012.Justice Annabelle Bennett told the court on Tuesday that the three-week hearing will begin next March, adding that she plans to fix the exact date on Friday. Apple had requested that the hearing take place next August, but Bennett said the timing was too late, Reuters reports.
"They [Samsung] are trying to expand the Android market. The longer it's left the harder it will be for Samsung," she remarked.
In the meantime, Apple will be allowed to continue sales of its latest iPhone, which launched in the country on Oct. 14. According to the report, Samsung's case against Apple in Australia accuses the company of infringing on three patents and carries more than 25 claims.
Samsung has opposed the iPhone 4S in several countries across the globe. For instance, the company filed preliminary injunction requests against the device in France and Italy almost immediately after Apple announced the handset. However, an Italian judge denied the South Korean electronics maker's request late last month and allowed Apple to launch its latest smartphone in the country.
Interestingly enough, Samsung has decided not to seek an injunction in its home country. A Korean newspaper revealed on Monday that the company opted not to file at the last minute because of public relations concerns.
"We concluded that we should engage in legal battles with Apple only in the global market," a spokesperson for Samsung reportedly said, "but not in order to gain more market share in Korea."
The two companies' fierce legal battle spans 10 countries and encompasses more than 20 complaints. Apple has seen some success against Samsung in Australia, winning an injunction against its rival's Galaxy Tab 10.1 tablet in the region. But, Samsung is appealing the decision, arguing that it was based on "irrelevant considerations" and that the judge made "errors of law in her approach." A formal hearing regarding the injunction is expected to be held next week.
On Topic: iPhone
- AT&T to bring FaceTime over cellular to all customers by end of year
- Apple debuts new iPhone discounts, subsidies to gain ground in India
- Looking to pull even with Apple, Samsung to pay developers for Galaxy-specific apps
- 10M Samsung flagship phones in 28 days a 'record,' 5M iPhone 5 in 3 days 'disappointing'
- Briefly: Virgin Mobile offers 15% discount on prepaid iPhone 4/4S
Previous Comments View All
Take Samsung down a few pegs. They have made their way through monopolistic practices in their own country and have only succeeded globally by copying others, not through innovation.
Apple lawyers claimed they needed until August to prepare for trial. So much for an open and shut case.
Don't forget that Apple should have revealed some IOS5 source code related to Qualcomm chip drivers that have connections with Samsung claims about Apple infringement. Only future will tell who gonna win..
http://www.zdnet.com.au/apple-keeps-...-339326002.htm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nairb 
Apple lawyers claimed they needed until August to prepare for trial. So much for an open and shut case.
Apple lawyers claimed they needed until August to prepare for trial. So much for an open and shut case.
Apple probably wanted the extra time so that they could bring into evidence the results of the EU Commission anti-trust investigation into FRAND monopoly abuse by Samsung! Apple can afford the delay because they already have an injunction against Samsung.
Having obtained an injunction in Germany, apparently based on FRAND essential patents, Motorola will now probably be drawn into the EU investigation.
Google, as the "moving hand" behind Motorola and Samsung will also probably be subject of the EU investigation, which may also look again at Google's anti-competitive and IP piracy behaviour generally.
This EU investigation has very serious, potentially devastating, implications for Google and their pirate OEMs. The EU can not only impose fines of 10% of global turnover on each the companies (which will help with EU finances
) but also its ruling on FRAND will be taken into account by other jurisdictions leading to possible further anti-trust investigations relating to the co-ordinated (cartel) global illegal, discriminatory, anti-competitive use of FRAND patents by these companies.(FRAND - Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory essential patents - are a waiver to allow participants to create a monopoly - in this case 3G standard - ON THE EXPLICIT CONDITION THAT THOSE COMPANIES THAT CONTRIBUTE THE ESSENTIAL PATENTS DO NO ACT IN THE WAY SAMSUNG & MOTOROLA HAVE. FRAND comes under the jurisdiction of French Courts, which are subsidiary, or subject to, EU Commission and EU Court rulings)
IMO the fact that these companies are clutching at straws misusing FRAND shows that they have very weak defences against Apple's claims.
As far as the EU is concerned Google is an IP serial offender, so the penalties against them may this time be the maximum available.
It is interesting to see that Samsung have decided not to use this illegal FRAND defence in its home country of South Korea, where on the face of it Samsung would have had home advantage, where it enjoys huge influence. I can only think that the South Korean Government, who are no fools, may have warned Samsung off this abuse of process! Bear in mind that the next step in this process might be an investigation by the WTO (World Trade Organisation) who have been vigorously pursuing IP theft and piracy - something that the South Korean government would like to avoid at all costs, given how dependant they are on exports!
IMO Samsung, Motorola and Google have been extremely naive and foolish using illegal monopolistic powers related to essential FRAND patents, provoking very serious anti-trust and anti-competetive investigations from the EU, and possibly soon the US and WTO. A serial offender like Google is extremely vulnerable to very serious penalties.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Secular Investor
Apple probably wanted the extra time so that they could bring into evidence the results of the EU Commission anti-trust investigation into FRAND monopoly abuse by Samsung! Apple can afford the delay because they already have an injunction against Samsung.
Having obtained an injunction in Germany, apparently based on FRAND essential patents, Motorola will now probably be drawn into the EU investigation.
Google, as the "moving hand" behind Motorola and Samsung will also probably be subject of the EU investigation, which may also look again at Google's anti-competitive and IP piracy behaviour generally.
This EU investigation has very serious, potentially devastating, implications for Google and their pirate OEMs. The EU can not only impose fines of 10% of global turnover on each the companies (which will help with EU finances) but also its ruling on FRAND will be taken into account by other jurisdictions leading to possible further anti-trust investigations relating to the co-ordinated (cartel) global illegal, discriminatory, anti-competitive use of FRAND patents by these companies.
(FRAND - Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory essential patents - are a waiver to allow participants to create a monopoly - in this case 3G standard - ON THE EXPLICIT CONDITION THAT THOSE COMPANIES THAT CONTRIBUTE THE ESSENTIAL PATENTS DO NO ACT IN THE WAY SAMSUNG & MOTOROLA HAVE. FRAND comes under the jurisdiction of French Courts, which are subsidiary, or subject to, EU Commission and EU Court rulings)
IMO the fact that these companies are clutching at straws misusing FRAND shows that they have very weak defences against Apple's claims.
As far as the EU is concerned Google is an IP serial offender, so the penalties against them may this time be the maximum available.
It is interesting to see that Samsung have decided not to use this illegal FRAND defence in its home country of South Korea, where on the face of it Samsung would have had home advantage, where it enjoys huge influence. I can only think that the South Korean Government, who are no fools, may have warned Samsung off this abuse of process! Bear in mind that the next step in this process might be an investigation by the WTO (World Trade Organisation) who have been vigorously pursuing IP theft and piracy - something that the South Korean government would like to avoid at all costs, given how dependant they are on exports!
IMO Samsung, Motorola and Google have been extremely naive and foolish using illegal monopolistic powers related to essential FRAND patents, provoking very serious anti-trust and anti-competetive investigations from the EU, and possibly soon the US and WTO. A serial offender like Google is extremely vulnerable to very serious penalties.
Apple probably wanted the extra time so that they could bring into evidence the results of the EU Commission anti-trust investigation into FRAND monopoly abuse by Samsung! Apple can afford the delay because they already have an injunction against Samsung.
Having obtained an injunction in Germany, apparently based on FRAND essential patents, Motorola will now probably be drawn into the EU investigation.
Google, as the "moving hand" behind Motorola and Samsung will also probably be subject of the EU investigation, which may also look again at Google's anti-competitive and IP piracy behaviour generally.
This EU investigation has very serious, potentially devastating, implications for Google and their pirate OEMs. The EU can not only impose fines of 10% of global turnover on each the companies (which will help with EU finances
) but also its ruling on FRAND will be taken into account by other jurisdictions leading to possible further anti-trust investigations relating to the co-ordinated (cartel) global illegal, discriminatory, anti-competitive use of FRAND patents by these companies.(FRAND - Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory essential patents - are a waiver to allow participants to create a monopoly - in this case 3G standard - ON THE EXPLICIT CONDITION THAT THOSE COMPANIES THAT CONTRIBUTE THE ESSENTIAL PATENTS DO NO ACT IN THE WAY SAMSUNG & MOTOROLA HAVE. FRAND comes under the jurisdiction of French Courts, which are subsidiary, or subject to, EU Commission and EU Court rulings)
IMO the fact that these companies are clutching at straws misusing FRAND shows that they have very weak defences against Apple's claims.
As far as the EU is concerned Google is an IP serial offender, so the penalties against them may this time be the maximum available.
It is interesting to see that Samsung have decided not to use this illegal FRAND defence in its home country of South Korea, where on the face of it Samsung would have had home advantage, where it enjoys huge influence. I can only think that the South Korean Government, who are no fools, may have warned Samsung off this abuse of process! Bear in mind that the next step in this process might be an investigation by the WTO (World Trade Organisation) who have been vigorously pursuing IP theft and piracy - something that the South Korean government would like to avoid at all costs, given how dependant they are on exports!
IMO Samsung, Motorola and Google have been extremely naive and foolish using illegal monopolistic powers related to essential FRAND patents, provoking very serious anti-trust and anti-competetive investigations from the EU, and possibly soon the US and WTO. A serial offender like Google is extremely vulnerable to very serious penalties.
So much speculative unsubstantiated shit.
Not even saying you're wrong...but it's allllllllll guesswork on your end.
PS...what does Google have to do with this other than being behind Android?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Secular Investor
Apple probably wanted the extra time so that they could bring into evidence the results of the EU Commission anti-trust investigation into FRAND monopoly abuse by Samsung! Apple can afford the delay because they already have an injunction against Samsung.
Having obtained an injunction in Germany, apparently based on FRAND essential patents, Motorola will now probably be drawn into the EU investigation.
Google, as the "moving hand" behind Motorola and Samsung will also probably be subject of the EU investigation, which may also look again at Google's anti-competitive and IP piracy behaviour generally.
This EU investigation has very serious, potentially devastating, implications for Google and their pirate OEMs. The EU can not only impose fines of 10% of global turnover on each the companies (which will help with EU finances) but also its ruling on FRAND will be taken into account by other jurisdictions leading to possible further anti-trust investigations relating to the co-ordinated (cartel) global illegal, discriminatory, anti-competitive use of FRAND patents by these companies.
(FRAND - Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory essential patents - are a waiver to allow participants to create a monopoly - in this case 3G standard - ON THE EXPLICIT CONDITION THAT THOSE COMPANIES THAT CONTRIBUTE THE ESSENTIAL PATENTS DO NO ACT IN THE WAY SAMSUNG & MOTOROLA HAVE. FRAND comes under the jurisdiction of French Courts, which are subsidiary, or subject to, EU Commission and EU Court rulings)
IMO the fact that these companies are clutching at straws misusing FRAND shows that they have very weak defences against Apple's claims.
As far as the EU is concerned Google is an IP serial offender, so the penalties against them may this time be the maximum available.
It is interesting to see that Samsung have decided not to use this illegal FRAND defence in its home country of South Korea, where on the face of it Samsung would have had home advantage, where it enjoys huge influence. I can only think that the South Korean Government, who are no fools, may have warned Samsung off this abuse of process! Bear in mind that the next step in this process might be an investigation by the WTO (World Trade Organisation) who have been vigorously pursuing IP theft and piracy - something that the South Korean government would like to avoid at all costs, given how dependant they are on exports!
IMO Samsung, Motorola and Google have been extremely naive and foolish using illegal monopolistic powers related to essential FRAND patents, provoking very serious anti-trust and anti-competetive investigations from the EU, and possibly soon the US and WTO. A serial offender like Google is extremely vulnerable to very serious penalties.
Apple probably wanted the extra time so that they could bring into evidence the results of the EU Commission anti-trust investigation into FRAND monopoly abuse by Samsung! Apple can afford the delay because they already have an injunction against Samsung.
Having obtained an injunction in Germany, apparently based on FRAND essential patents, Motorola will now probably be drawn into the EU investigation.
Google, as the "moving hand" behind Motorola and Samsung will also probably be subject of the EU investigation, which may also look again at Google's anti-competitive and IP piracy behaviour generally.
This EU investigation has very serious, potentially devastating, implications for Google and their pirate OEMs. The EU can not only impose fines of 10% of global turnover on each the companies (which will help with EU finances
) but also its ruling on FRAND will be taken into account by other jurisdictions leading to possible further anti-trust investigations relating to the co-ordinated (cartel) global illegal, discriminatory, anti-competitive use of FRAND patents by these companies.(FRAND - Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory essential patents - are a waiver to allow participants to create a monopoly - in this case 3G standard - ON THE EXPLICIT CONDITION THAT THOSE COMPANIES THAT CONTRIBUTE THE ESSENTIAL PATENTS DO NO ACT IN THE WAY SAMSUNG & MOTOROLA HAVE. FRAND comes under the jurisdiction of French Courts, which are subsidiary, or subject to, EU Commission and EU Court rulings)
IMO the fact that these companies are clutching at straws misusing FRAND shows that they have very weak defences against Apple's claims.
As far as the EU is concerned Google is an IP serial offender, so the penalties against them may this time be the maximum available.
It is interesting to see that Samsung have decided not to use this illegal FRAND defence in its home country of South Korea, where on the face of it Samsung would have had home advantage, where it enjoys huge influence. I can only think that the South Korean Government, who are no fools, may have warned Samsung off this abuse of process! Bear in mind that the next step in this process might be an investigation by the WTO (World Trade Organisation) who have been vigorously pursuing IP theft and piracy - something that the South Korean government would like to avoid at all costs, given how dependant they are on exports!
IMO Samsung, Motorola and Google have been extremely naive and foolish using illegal monopolistic powers related to essential FRAND patents, provoking very serious anti-trust and anti-competetive investigations from the EU, and possibly soon the US and WTO. A serial offender like Google is extremely vulnerable to very serious penalties.
Good capture of the key points under fire in these cases, but I hesitate to widely condemn as "monopolistic abuses" Google's use of Android to leverage the platform. However I roundly dismiss their claim of just wanting to provide an open platform against the Apple "juggernaut" in the smartphone space. It was not altruism that brought Google to buy Android - it was realising the truth in the vision that Apple had for future computing as mobile devices, and they wanted in on the ground floor of that movement. The whole open thing was just a PR move to ignite the passions of the geek world to support their efforts. An easier task than sweating the small details and taking the development hours to get it right before releasing it to the consuming public.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fecklesstechguy
Good capture of the key points under fire in these cases, but I hesitate to widely condemn as "monopolistic abuses" Google's use of Android to leverage the platform. However I roundly dismiss their claim of just wanting to provide an open platform against the Apple "juggernaut" in the smartphone space. It was not altruism that brought Google to buy Android - it was realising the truth in the vision that Apple had for future computing as mobile devices, and they wanted in on the ground floor of that movement. The whole open thing was just a PR move to ignite the passions of the geek world to support their efforts. An easier task than sweating the small details and taking the development hours to get it right before releasing it to the consuming public.
Good capture of the key points under fire in these cases, but I hesitate to widely condemn as "monopolistic abuses" Google's use of Android to leverage the platform. However I roundly dismiss their claim of just wanting to provide an open platform against the Apple "juggernaut" in the smartphone space. It was not altruism that brought Google to buy Android - it was realising the truth in the vision that Apple had for future computing as mobile devices, and they wanted in on the ground floor of that movement. The whole open thing was just a PR move to ignite the passions of the geek world to support their efforts. An easier task than sweating the small details and taking the development hours to get it right before releasing it to the consuming public.
You mean get it right like Siri server breakdowns, battery life problems some of which were made worse by Apples ruugh fix, ir the iCloud outage a couple of days ago?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nairb
Apple lawyers claimed they needed until August to prepare for trial. So much for an open and shut case.
Apple lawyers claimed they needed until August to prepare for trial. So much for an open and shut case.
More likely, Apple just wanted to push potential sales of the Galaxy Tab as far back as possible. The longer the court case drags on, the greater the impact on sales.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AbsoluteDesignz
So much speculative unsubstantiated shit.
Not even saying you're wrong...but it's allllllllll guesswork on your end.
PS...what does Google have to do with this other than being behind Android?
So much speculative unsubstantiated shit.
Not even saying you're wrong...but it's allllllllll guesswork on your end.
PS...what does Google have to do with this other than being behind Android?
So you call unsubstantiated BS without any evidence to support the statement?
How can you call BS on something without being able to demonstrate that you have evidence to the contrary? Instead, you go on to say, "not even saying you're wrong"? Seriously??
And realistically, Google is complicit by supplying Android to each of the current handset makers that are involved with lawsuits against or from Apple, and by publically stating that they will provide whatever assistance needed to defend the handset maker against Apple (and apparently Microsoft). They may be more successful in defending against Apple, but Microsoft has been very successful in leveraging licensing agreements with most of the handset makers thus far.
On topic, it will be interesting to see whether the findings of the EU review of Samsung will reinforce or invalidate Samsung's suit here. I think that's why, they are trying to get as much on the table now as they can to hamper Apple before that review produces findings.
Latest Apple Headlines
-
AT&T to bring FaceTime over cellular to all customers by end of year
~1 hour ago -
Inside Apple's push for comprehensive corporate tax reform
~2 hours ago -
Apple details 'extraordinary amount' of taxes it pays in testimony to US Senate
~2 hours ago -
Apple debuts new iPhone discounts, subsidies to gain ground in India
~3 hours ago -
Domestic Mac sales flat in April, viewed as slight positive for Apple
~4 hours ago - more...
| Model | White | Black | |
|---|---|---|---|
| iPad mini (WiFi only) | |||
| 16GB WiFi |  |
$329.99 | $329.99 |
| 32GB WiFi | |
$429.99 | $429.99 |
| 64GB WiFi | |
$529.99 | $529.99 |
| iPad mini (WiFi + 4G) | |||
 |
 |
 |
|
| 16GB 4G White | $459.99 | $459.99 | $459.99 |
| 32GB 4G White | $559.99 | $559.99 | $559.99 |
| 64GB 4G White | $659.99 | $659.99 | $659.99 |
| 16GB 4G Black | $459.99 | $459.99 | $459.99 |
| 32GB 4G Black | $559.99 | $559.99 | $559.99 |
| 64GB 4G Black | $659.99 | $659.99 | $659.99 |
Lowest Prices Anywhere!
| Model | Price | You Save |
|---|---|---|
| Core i5 MacBook Pros w/ Retina | ||
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/128GB | $1,406.48 | $292.52 |
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,479.99 | $519.01 |
| 13" 2.5GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,699.99 | $799.01 |
| Core i7 MacBook Pros w/ Retina | ||
| 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,599.99 | $599.01 |
| 13" 2.9GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,799.99 | $899.01 |
| 15" 2.3GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,899.99 | $299.01 |
| 15" 2.6GHz/8GB/512GB | $2,299.99 | $568.01 |
| 15" 2.7GHz/16GB/768GB | $2,699.99 | $499.01 |
Hmm... Ah well, I'll just sit here and wait for the iPad 3. My mum is reading the Steve Jobs biography on my iPad 2 when I'm not using it LOL.