Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple predicted to introduce lower cost iPhone models in June

Apple's next update to the blockbuster iPhone handset is expected by one prominent analyst to have a lower total cost of ownership, and to also include new gesture-based functionality.

Katy Huberty with Morgan Stanley maintains that the biggest barrier to greater iPhone adoption is the cost of the hardware, followed by the service plan. The investment in the device has been its biggest issue in both developed markets like the U.S. and emerging ones like China.

But Huberty expects Apple to address that in June, by introducing a new model that will be economically friendly to even more consumers.

"We expect Apple to launch new iPhones in June that offer both a lower total cost of ownership and new functionality, potentially including gesture-based technology," she wrote in a new note to investors Friday.

In 2009, when Apple introduced the new iPhone 3GS, the company also dropped the price of the previous year's iPhone 3G to $99. However, despite the lower price point, the high end iPhone 3GS was still the most popular option for consumers.

In addition to lower cost of ownership for the iPhone, Huberty remains bullish on AAPL stock because of the forthcoming iPad launch in March. Here she is particularly optimistic, projecting shipments of 6 million devices in the 2010 calendar year, versus Wall Street's average projections of 3 million to 4 million.

"We expect Apple to ship its first iPad and announce additional content deals in late March to better than expected demand," Huberty wrote. "We see the iPad targeting the sub-$800 consumer notebook market which equates to 30M annual units just in the US (120M globally."

Morgan Stanley has maintained its "overweight" rating for AAPL stock, with a price target of $250.

In the past, Huberty was notoriously negative on AAPL stock, suggesting the iPhone was too expensive even at a $199 price point. In late 2008, she predicted that iPhone sales would suffer because Apple had priced the product too high.

But last year, Huberty turned positive on Apple, stating that the company had become the "clear leader in the battle over the mobile Internet."



82 Comments

mazda 3s 16 Years · 1598 comments

Cost is the greatest barrier? Cheapskates can get refurb'd models for sub-$100. Hell, Best Buy had 16GB 3GS phones for $50 this week.

http://slickdeals.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1882030

envirog 15 Years · 188 comments

I do agree that the iPad will perform exceptionally well for Apple and expand the 'halo' effect to other Apple product lines

doyourownthing 15 Years · 371 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazda 3s

Cost is the greatest barrier? Cheapskates can get refurb'd models for sub-$100. Hell, Best Buy had 16GB 3GS phones for $50 this week.

http://slickdeals.net/forums/showthread.php?t=1882030

not every person lives in the us

an unsubsidized iphone is very expensive, specially in developing countries

r u serious 15 Years · 11 comments

These people (analysts) are a joke. The information they report on is equal to gossip magazines for me. Rarely if ever do they have anything worthy to say. Next...

I have not heard, nor seen, one bit of consumer data that suggests people are refusing to buy the iphone bc it is too expensive. I mean the 3G is $99 - give me a break! If people are refusing bc that is too high then maybe they should not have a phone.

Most people I know who won't purchase an iphone don't bc they don't want AT&T or they are waiting for the next release. For the money, it is the best bang for the buck and clearly the best phone available period.

I hope they don't change the pricing at all - but instead give us more for the money.

r u serious 15 Years · 11 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by doyourownthing

not every person lives in the us

an unsubsidized iphone is very expensive, specially in developing countries

you are correct. But you have to keep in mind, this is an analyst who is reporting on conditions/opinions related to the iphone, Apple, and stock in the US. She is a market analyst (and a lousy one at that). Her comments were not aimed at the pricing of the iphone in a global market. That would be a different type of report from a more qualified individual.