Geekbench developer Primate Labs has compiled scores from the Geekbench Result Browser for all the standard MacBook Air CPU configurations dating back to 2008 and pit them against scores for the iPad and the latest 13-inch MacBook Pro models, as those are the two products most customers will use as comparisons.
The new 13.3-inch MacBook Airs, which include a 1.86GHz Core 2 Duo processor, faired pretty well, posting scores that suggest it's capable of roughly 80% of the performance of the latest 13.3-inch MacBook Pros, which ship with 2.4GHz and 2.66GHz Core 2 Duo chips.
On the other hand, the 11.6-inch MacBook Air, which includes a 1.4GHz Core 2 Duo, was only capable of reaching 60% of the performance of the 2.4GHz 13.3-inch MacBook Pro, raising questions as to whether it would make a good fit as a primary machine.
"There are two ways you can look at the new 11-inch MacBook Air; it's either a much smaller but slower MacBook Pro, or a much faster but larger iPad," wrote Geekbench author John Poole. "The 11-inch MacBook Air is small enough that I'd consider bringing it instead of an iPad, but I'd worry it's not fast enough (or have enough screen space) to be my primary laptop."
It should be noted that Poole did not include scores for Late 2010 1.6GHz or 2.13GHz MacBook Airs, which are $100 build-to-order options for the 11.6- and 13.3-inch models, respectively, through Apple's online store.
AppleInsider recently published a first look at the new Airs ahead of its formal review. It also lined up a deal with reseller MacMall, which is currently offering AppleInsider readers an additional 3% off its already reduced pricing when ordering online using the links in the chart below, or through AppleInsider's full-fledged Mac Price Guide. It's also offering $102 savings off a high-end, non-standard 13.3-inch configuration that includes the 2.13GHz Core 2 Duo processor mentioned above.
75 Comments
I doubt this performance is a shock to anyone. The thing that sells the Air is the size/portability of the device - not performance. There has always been a performance gap but it is acceptable to those with this need.
I personally would take the extra weight for performance and display size but I think what they have squeezed into these small pkgs is amazing.
Benchmark performance differences:
Between 13"MBP 2.4GHz and 11"Air 1.4GHz ? 1332
Between 11"Air 1.4GHz and iPad ? 1573
Conclusion, the 11"Air 1.4GHz is more similar in performance stats to a MBP, therefore it is more analogous of a slower MBP.
Benchmark performance differences:
Between 13"MBP 2.4GHz and 11"Air 1.4GHz — 1332
Between 11"Air 1.4GHz and iPad — 1573
Conclusion, the 11"Air 1.4GHz is more similar in performance stats to a MBP, therefore it is more analogous of a slower MBP.
Note that the test was done based on browsing. Add to that the fact that the Air has a full operating system to run real programs (i.e. more than just apps...you can do your taxes on it, for example), has USB ports for extra storage and connectivity, has a keyboard, etc....it's even more obvious that it's a slow MBP, and not a fast iPad.
Plus....the iPad needs a 'real' computer to snyc with. It's not stand-alone. You can sync an iPad with a Macbook Air, just like any other Mac.
Benchmark performance differences:
Between 13"MBP 2.4GHz and 11"Air 1.4GHz ? 1332
Between 11"Air 1.4GHz and iPad ? 1573
Conclusion, the 11"Air 1.4GHz is more similar in performance stats to a MBP, therefore it is more analogous of a slower MBP.
I'll buy that. Discussion closed.
I think the new macbook air is analogous to a really really fast ipod nano with a way bigger screen and a keyboard