For the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010, AT&T reported a profit of $1.09 billion, or 18 cents per share, well short of its $2.7 billion, or 46 cents per share profit in the same quarter last year. And although it activated over 4 million iPhones, the No. 2 U.S. wireless carrier said that it netted just 400,000 new contract customers during the quarter.
That figure missed Wall Street's consensus view by more than 100,000 subscribers. It also fell short of Verizon's net adds during a similar time frame, which totaled roughly 572,000 after subtracting activations from roughly 300,000 tablets, MiFi devices and other devices that Verizon books as post paid compared to AT&T's booking as pre-paid. As such, shares of the Dallas, TX-based carrier slipped more than 3% in early morning trading Thursday.
On a brighter note, AT&T demonstrated that it retains other areas of potential growth outside of the iPhone. In particular, the carrier said its addition of 442,000 wireless 3G data customers using tablets like the iPad were much higher than it had expected.
It also reported that wireless data revenues — driven by messaging, Internet access, access to applications and related services — increased $1.1 billion, or 27.4Â percent, from the year-earlier quarter to $4.9Â billion. Postpaid wireless subscribers on monthly data plans also increased by 20.4Â percent over the past year, while text messages carried on its network increased by nearly 29Â percent to 173.1Â billion. At the same time, multimedia messages increased by 75.0 percent to 3.9Â billion.
Looking ahead to 2011, AT&T said it expects consolidated revenue growth but offered no formal estimates as it's likely taking a wait-and-see approach to the impact Verizon's iPhone launch will have on its wireless business when the rival carrier begins offering the iPhone to its own customers on February 10th.
17 Comments
Good grief. Based off of this snippet of chosen information posted here you might think AT&T was performing horribly.
How about the following per the CEO -
* Best 4Q and year wireless net adds in history
* ARPU growth for 8 straight QTR's
* Almost $20 billion in mobile data annualized revenue. Tripled from 3 years earlier.
It is amazing that they apparently added more tablet customers than phone customers, although I can kind of see why that might be the case.
Good grief. Based off of this snippet of chosen information posted here you might think AT&T was performing horribly.
How about the following per the CEO -
* Best 4Q and year wireless net adds in history
* ARPU growth for 8 straight QTR's
* Almost $20 billion in mobile data annualized revenue. Tripled from 3 years earlier.
Adding to that?
They are now ahead of Verizon in some ways, though that lead is surely short lived. For instance, Verizon?s 94.1 million customers compared to AT&T?s 95.5 million.
They also came below analyst predictions. Still, they had a lower churn rate than AT&T which is pretty impressive pre-iPhone announcement. They will surely fly past AT&T this next quarter and then maintain that lead growth quarter after quarter.
The number I'd like to know is how many of those 400,000 new contracts were iPhones.
I don't see why some consensus of people who by definition do not have all the pertinent data is so critical to deciding whether a company is successful or not.
Never mind that is a single metric of what a company is doing overall.
Is AT&T now going to go through a period of time when they are referred to as "beleaguered" or is that too big a stretch?
How many here recall how many times "Apple" and "Beleaguered" were used in the same headline - and how many times it was proclaimed that "Apple is Doomed" - often on the heels of their latest report or record unit sales and profits.
What is those "experts" have stock in Verizon (or options or whatever) and want to see AT&T take a hit - or some similar scenario.
I am not sure which would be better - requiring that someone giving advice on a stock have no material interest in the performance of that stock - or the other way around - don't tell me what you think a stock will do unless you are following your own advice. But then how do you determine when someone is trying to manipulate or at least influence the price of a stock?