According to a motion filed earlier this week, Microsoft has requested that a court brief recently filed by Apple be dismissed because of length and font size, GeekWire reports. At 31 pages, Apple's brief exceeds the 25 page limit. Microsoft also claims the brief does not meet the minimum 11 point font size.
In the motion, Microsoft asked for Apple's response brief to be stricken and for the Cupertino, Calif., company to refile a brief "that complies with the rules and does not add any new matter or arguments."
Microsoft may be looking to buy more time for its countering brief, as the motion requests the briefing schedule be suspended while Apple prepares its corrected response brief.
At issue is whether Apple has the right to trademark the term "App Store." Apple filed for the trademark in 2008 after the launch of the iPhone App Store. In January of this year, a Microsoft filing surfaced revealing that the Redmond, Wash., software giant had opposed Apple's trademark application on the grounds that the term was too generic.
"'App' is a common generic name for the goods offered at Appleâs store, as shown in dictionary definitions and by widespread use by Apple and others," Microsoft wrote in its request for summary judgment. "'Store' is generic for the 'retail store services' for which Apple seeks registration, and indeed, Apple refers to its 'App Store' as a store."
Apple responded earlier this month with the brief in question, arguing that the term "App Store" is no more generic than Microsoft's "Windows" trademark.
"Having itself faced a decades-long genericness challenge to its claimed WINDOWS mark, Microsoft should be well aware that the focus in evaluating genericness is on the mark as a whole and requires a fact-intensive assessment of the primary significance of the term to a substantial majority of the relevant public," Apple wrote in the brief.
The case will be decided by U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
71 Comments
Ugh! Whenever you need the "services" of an attorney, you are already screwed! Too many attorneys!
.lol.
App Store is probably too generic. So is Windows, but MS got their trademark.
Interesting legal debate, but doesn't affect Apple much either way.
okay, I'm not even going to touch this issue except to say "wow"...
App Store is probably too generic. So is Windows, but MS got their trademark.
Interesting legal debate, but doesn't affect Apple much either way.
Tend to agree, it's not all that important. If Apple can win it though, it will be a constant irritation for the competition to have to avoid using the term 'app store' whenever they refer to...app stores...and will remind customers from time to time that Apple were the trailblazers in this.
I can't help but feel if MS had come up with the idea first (and why the hell didn't they will 20 years of IT dominance?) it would have been called the 'Program Store', as I cannot ever recall MS using the term 'app'.
It's does smack of pettiness somehow though. Even so, it'll be interesting to see how it works itself out. I'm just glad I'm not paying the legal fees! (I like to think the staggering £500 profit Apple made on my MacBook Pro went to building the New Stanford Hospital )