The filing, discovered by Florian Mueller of FOSS Patents, specifically accuses Samsung of violating three Apple design patents and one utility patent. Mueller described the motion as a risky "hole-in-one" attempt from Apple that could accelerate the case.
If granted, the injunction would require Samsung to remove the following four products from the U.S. market within the next few months:
- Infuse 4G
- Galaxy S 4G
- Droid Charge
- Galaxy Tab 10.1
The Cupertino, Calif.-based company added that it was âlimitingâ the injunction to new Samsung products recently released in the U.S. and had left out the as-yet-to-be-released âGalaxy S 2 Phoneâ and the âGalaxy Tab 8.9 tabletâ. However, Apple said that it âreserves the right to seek preliminary injunction against those two products as their release becomes imminent.â
Apple maintained that it's other claims are "equally strong," but could potentially raise additional issues that would hold up the motion. "It's hard to imagine a more compelling case for issuing a preliminary injunction," the filing read.
Alongside the motion, Apple has filed a concurrent motion for an expedited trial on all of its claims. The company has asked for a court hearing for the preliminary injunction on August 5 and an expedited jury trial for the whole case in February 2012.
It appears that Samsung wonât back down from Appleâs latest filing. "We're going to actively protect and defend our intellectual property and our ability to provide consumers with innovative technology," company spokesman Kim Titus said.
The Korean electronics giant fired back at Apple this week with a request for an import ban of Apple's devices, including the iPhone and iPad. The company also asserted in a filing on Friday that it is competing with, not copying, Apple, accusing the iPhone maker of attempting to "avoid such competition."
Apple began its legal battle with Samsung in April when it sued the company, accusing the company of copying the iPhone and the iPad.Samsung quickly retaliated by launching its own lawsuit both in the U.S. and abroad, arguing that Apple had violated several of its patents, including âtechnology for tethering a mobile phone to a PC to enable the PC to utilize the phone's wireless data connection.â
Since then the two companies have asked to see their competitors unreleased products. Apple asked for and was allowed access to the already announced Galaxy Tab 10.1 and 8.9, Galaxy S II, Droid Charge, and Infuse 4G. Samsung attempted the same maneuver, but was denied access to Apple's unannounced fifth-generation iPhone and third-generation iPad.
Recent reports suggest that the companies' legal battle could significantly affect their business relationship. While Apple is expected to be the Korean company's largest customer this year with orders for $7.8 billion worth of components, rumors claim that Apple is looking to cut "some, if not all, Samsung-made components" from its supply chain. In particular, Apple is rumored to be moving production of the next-generation A6 chip away from Samsung to Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company in 2012.
66 Comments
uh oh...
but galaxy tab 10.1?
really? meh.
uh oh...
but galaxy tab 10.1?
really? meh.
You think the 10.1 looks distinctly different from the iPad?
You think the 10.1 looks distinctly different from the iPad?
you think Mc Donald's burger looks distinctly different from Burger King's burger?
you think Mc Donald's burger looks distinctly different from Burger King's burger?
What do burgers have to do with this? (and I didn't realize Burger King patented the look of their burger! Who would've thought!?)
you think Mc Donald's burger looks distinctly different from Burger King's burger?
You think that makes sense? I can't even start to explain this to you if you really think that is a rational argument.