Sam Oliver
The new figures from AnandTech show the iPhone 4S with an overall Geekbench score of 623, easily besting the 800MHz A4 CPU found in the iPhone 4. The iPhone 4S processor is clocked slower than the 1GHz A5 CPu found in the iPad 2, which earned a score of 751.
And in terms of its graphics processing capabilities, the iPhone 4S lived up to claims of being seven times faster than the iPhone 4. In one test, the iPhone 4S earned a score of 73.1 while the iPhone 4 took 11.2, and in another the iPhone 4S clocked a score of 122.7, compared to 15.3 for the iPhone 4.
GPU scores for the iPhone 4S, like the overall CPU score, were slightly slower than the iPad 2. But they also easily bested the competition, including the Samsung Galaxy S II, Samsung Infuse 4G, and Motorola Droid Bionic, all of which feature processors with higher clock speeds.
The site noted that while lowering the clock speed of the A5 from 1GHz in the iPad 2 to 800MHz in the iPhone 4S results in a "marginal loss" in performance, but "yields a greater-than-linear decrease in power consumption," offering the handset even greater battery life.
"At a lower operating frequency than its Android competitors, Apple does have to exploit its strengths in software to avoid any tangible performance penalties," authors Anand Lai Shimpi and Brian Klug wrote. "Apple has traditionally done this very well in the past, so I don't expect the loss of frequency to be a huge deal to the few who cross-shop iOS and Android."
The testing also correlated with earlier results that showed the iPhone 4S will offer a huge leap in performance over the iPhone 4 in its Mobile Safari Browser. In SunSpider Javascript Benchmark tests, where a lower score is better, the iPhone 4S earned 2222, compared to 3921 for the iPhone 4 and 5785 for the iPhone 3GS.
Malcolm Owen
Christine McKee
William Gallagher
Amber Neely
48 Comments
So these numbers tell that there is absolutely no reason why Siri won't be coming to an iPad 2
GPU scores for the iPhone 4S, like the overall CPU score, were slightly slower than the iPad 2. But they also easily bested the competition, including the Samsung Galaxy S II, Samsung Infuse 4G, and Motorola Droid Bionic, all of which feature processors with higher clock speeds.
Cue all the trolls who are going to start whining that the test isn't meaningful and the iPhone's specs are inadequate.
So these numbers tell that there is absolutely no reason why Siri won't be coming to an iPad 2
Nonsense. First, these tests show that the iPhone 4S is anywhere between almost twice as fast and up to 7 times as fast as the iPhone 4 (with OpenCL, software might be using the GPL). Second, IIRC, most of these tests are single threaded. If Siri is multithreaded, you get another two-fold improvement.
Clearly, the 4S is dramatically faster than the 4.
Cue all the trolls who are going to start whining that the test isn't meaningful and the iPhone's specs are inadequate.
Nonsense. First, these tests show that the iPhone 4S is anywhere between almost twice as fast and up to 7 times as fast as the iPhone 4 (with OpenCL, software might be using the GPL). Second, IIRC, most of these tests are single threaded. If Siri is multithreaded, you get another two-fold improvement.
Clearly, the 4S is dramatically faster than the 4.
You completely mis-read the other guy's post. He was asking why Siri isn't on the iPad 2, which is in every way a more powerful device than the iPhone 4S.
So these numbers tell that there is absolutely no reason why Siri won't be coming to an iPad 2
No reason related to hardware or software viability.
There are other reasons in the world.
You completely mis-read the other guy's post.
Nothing new. I find that sort of response to my posts on a regular basis.