In a press release on Tuesday, Nuevas TecnologÃas y EnergÃas Catalá (NT-K) announced that it had filed charges against Apple with Valencia's district attorney for alleged acts of extortion following an aggressive patent litigation campaign, reports FOSS Patents.
The filing is part of an ongoing court battle between the two companies that has been active for over a year, instigated by Apple's initial November 2010 accusation that NT-K's tablet copied the iPad's design. A short-term customs ban was sought and granted against the small tablet maker's products, and Apple went so far as to file criminal charges following correspondence between the rivaling companies.
NT-K successfully defended itself against the patent attack by Apple against its Android-based tablet, winning a dismissal of the case in November 2011, and is now attempting to prove that the tech giant's litigation was aggressive enough to be considered extortion under Spanish law.
According to FOSS Patent's Florian Mueller, Spanish extortion "comes down to someone with the intent to enrich himself forcing, through violence or intimidation, his victim to commit or desist from an act or transaction to the economic detriment of the victim or a third party."
Mueller goes on to say that while NT-K's argument that Apple sought to enrich itself through legal action against the small company is cogent on the surface, aggressive enforcement of patent rights is not a necessarily a criminal offense.
NT-K Pad | Source: NT-K
Since Apple's allegations were dismissed, NT-K can possibly recover damages and pursue other legal action, but the iPad maker's actions are likely to fall short of being interpreted as extortion. Mueller notes that while Apple's litigation may be characterized as "bullying," there was most likely reasonable foundation for a dispute and as such both parties have the right to state their grievances and threaten legal action.
The small Spanish tablet maker is planning to publish documentation regarding the extortion case against Apple on its blog in the coming week.
30 Comments
Huh. Is it really in these guys' best interest to bring themselves into the spotlight? Looks like Samsung could sue them for direct design copying.
I'd love to see some photos of there device. From what I saw last time it really did look like Apple in the wrong.
Huh. Is it really in these guys' best interest to bring themselves into the spotlight? Looks like Samsung could sue them for direct design copying.
Can you sue for a copy of a copy of a copy?
I'd love to see some photos of there device. From what I saw last time it really did look like Apple in the wrong.
Tableta NT-K Pad
These no name companies making tablets not sure why apple bother they will shoot themselves anyway.
My in-laws went to one of those stupid time share weekends and for their trouble they were give a no name Android table valued at $500. Well junk does not describe this thing, It says the touch screen best works with a stylus. and it has buttons all over it. My in-laws wanted to use it to surf the web and maybe check their email, we try to set up the email, which they use google mail and you think it should work, well it didn't it kept coming back and said it failed to authenticate with the server. So we attempted to go in view the browsers and it would not allow us it keep saying the security cert was out of date or not valid.
The more we played around with it realize all they did was used the android phone version not the tablet version since it had all kinds of phone features still in the menus and setups information.
These knock off android tables will just make the whole user experience bad, now my in-laws want a ipad.