Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple Card's future in question as Goldman Sachs CEO eyes early exit

Goldman Sachs may part ways with Apple

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon signaled the possible early end of the bank's Apple Card partnership due to financial losses and regulatory challenges.

The collaboration between Apple and Goldman Sachs on the Apple Card may end before its 2030 contract expiration, according to Reuters. The announcement follows years of financial losses and regulatory challenges for the investment bank, raising questions about the future of Apple's first credit card.

Goldman Sachs partnered with Apple in 2019 to launch the Apple Card, which delivers seamless integration with iOS and user-friendly features like no fees and enhanced privacy. While the card gained popularity among Apple customers, it proved costly for Goldman.

The company reportedly lost $1.2 billion in 2022 due to the partnership, with its platform solutions unit posting an $859 million net loss in 2024.

The financial strain wasn't the only issue — Goldman Sachs also faced regulatory scrutiny over its credit card business. In October 2024, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) fined the bank more than $90 million for missteps related to the Apple Card.

The agency scrutinized Goldman Sachs for billing errors, dispute resolution, and compliance with the Fair Credit Billing Act. It also examined payment dispute delays and errors causing incorrect charges or adverse credit score impacts.

The CFPB found Goldman Sachs struggled to meet regulatory consumer credit standards, despite its reputation as a global investment bank known for its expertise in financial services.

These challenges led Goldman Sachs to explore an early exit from the partnership. By 2023, Goldman Sachs began informal discussions about transferring its role as the Apple Card issuer, with JPMorgan Chase emerging as a potential replacement, among other banks.

Talks are ongoing, but no successor has been confirmed.

The partnership has also impacted Goldman Sachs' financial performance, dragging down its return on equity by 75 to 100 basis points in 2023. Still, CEO David Solomon expressed cautious optimism, forecasting improved returns by 2025 or 2026 as the company reassesses its focus.

Apple faces questions about the Apple Card's future with Goldman Sachs' potential departure. Despite its strong user base and ecosystem integration, Apple seeks a replacement bank that aligns with its customer-first approach.

However, combining tech innovation with the heavily regulated financial services sector poses challenges.

Apple Card & Savings

Apple Savings, introduced in 2023, enhances the Apple Card's appeal. Powered by Goldman Sachs, it's a high-yield savings account that automatically deposits Daily Cash rewards or adds funds from linked bank accounts.

iPhone screen showing savings account balance of $2,106.19 and latest card transactions: La Colombe Coffee $5.50, Apple Store $168.94. Apple Savings

It has seamless integration into the Wallet app with no fees or minimum balance requirements. Offering competitive interest rates, Apple Savings allows users to grow their money while staying connected to Apple's ecosystem.

A change of banks for the Apple Card could impact Apple Savings, as the feature is currently backed by Goldman Sachs. If Apple transitions to a new banking partner, such as JPMorgan Chase, it may require adjustments to the savings account infrastructure, potentially disrupting account management and Daily Cash reward deposits.

Interest rates and account features may change under a new bank, potentially affecting Apple Card Savings' competitive edge. Apple will obviously prioritize a smooth transition, but major changes to account ease of use, fees, or Wallet app integration could reduce user satisfaction.

The Apple Card remains a compelling product with unique features and a digital experience in the Wallet app. As discussions progress, it's not certain what form the Apple Card will take as a new bank comes on board.



7 Comments

entropys 14 Years · 4329 comments

Why not just straight with Mastercard or visa? Logo issues?

Might even make it easier to expand Apple Card overseas.

0 Likes · 1 Dislike
caskey 11 Years · 39 comments

entropys said:
Why not just straight with Mastercard or visa? Logo issues?

Might even make it easier to expand Apple Card overseas.

Credit cards don't work that way. Visa and MasterCard are the payment networks but not the actual issuers of cards. Credit Cards must be issued by a bank that provides the financial backbone for the account. There is a lot of regulations involved which is why Apple can't simply just issue the cards themselves. They need to partner with a bank that can manage the accounts and create the cards. International is even more complicated because of the individual banking regulations a company must adhere to in each country to comply with the law. Apple will need to find banking partners in every company they want to issue cards in to be compliant with the law.

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
neoncat 6 Years · 170 comments

entropys said:
Why not just straight with Mastercard or visa? Logo issues?

Might even make it easier to expand Apple Card overseas.

Because Visa and Mastercard don't issue cards. They run the payment networks that move money from banks to merchants as a result of a purchase and handle granting access to that network to card issuers and merchants. The issuing bank is who maintains the relationship with you, the cardholder, and does things like determine the credit risk, collect payments, etc. This is different than AmEx which is both an issuing bank and controls their own payment network, but that's why there's only one AmEx versus lots of Visas or MasterCards. 

As a result, Apple would need to charter a bank to issue the card itself, subjecting itself to the intense regulations that banks operate under. And a bank cannot just exist to issue credit cards—it would need to be capitalized through some other means, like consumer banking or lending. It is much smarter for them, with much lower risk, to partner with an existing bank. Whether or not GS was the right choice or not is up for debate. I suspect if Chase indeed takes over at some point, the whole process will become much less fraught with the sort of problems GS suffered.

EDIT: Beaten by Caskey by 1 minute!

:smiley: 

tlinn 5 Years · 11 comments

As someone who worked in the financial industry for quite a while, I was surprised when Goldman Sachs agreed to Apple's terms that forced them to accept low-quality customers. Apple reaped the benefits of increased sales while Goldman was responsible for writing off the predictable defaults. Hindsight is 20/20, but it didn't take hindsight to understand the move was stupid on their part.

I hope the move to Chase happens, and happens soon. Of all the card issuers, Chase is the gold standard in my experience. They offer the best cards and the most generous rewards. They are the easiest to work with when there is a problem. Their online tools are second to none. Goldman Sachs feels like dealing with Synchrony. Their operation lacks sophistication and the integrations with software like Quicken that are standard with other card issuers.

Hopefully, the next issuer—Chase or someone else—will improve the rewards offered for using Apple Card. Customers should get 5% back on purchases at the Apple Store. That standard everywhere else: Chase's Amazon card pays 5% on Amazon purchases. Capital One's REI card pays 5% on REI purchases. 3% is cheap. And many cards offer quality rewards on other purchases: Citi's Costco card offers 4% back on gas. Chase's Sapphire cards offer 3% back on dining and travel. Citi's Double Cash card offers a 2% reward on everything. There is little reason to use the Apple Card right now except for purchases at the Apple Store that aren't available at Amazon.

grandact73 3 Years · 65 comments

It's an extremely mediocre card anyways. Not much will be lost if the card goes away.

0 Likes · 2 Dislikes