The pictured component, highlighted by the Japanese-language site Macotakara, clearly shows on the connector that it is manufactured by Sharp. But the site also claims it is a QXGA 9.7-inch display that "seems to be for the next iPad."
The display has three flat cables that connect to the base of the LCD, which is said to sport a high-resolution 2,048-by-1,536-pixel display. That's the same size that has been rumored for an Apple-branded Retina Display on the third-generation iPad.
The resolution suggests that Apple's so-called "iPad 3" will not match the 326 pixel-per-inch density of the iPhone 4S, iPhone 4 and iPod touch. Rather, the rumored resolution would be a pixel density of around 260 pixels-per-inch, with quadruple the resolution found on the current iPad.
Currently, the iPad 2 and first-generation iPad have a resolution of 1,024-by-768 pixels, which has a density of 132 pixels-per-inch. That falls well short of Apple's "Retina Display" distinction, named so because the individual pixels are so small that they are all but impossible for the human eye to discern.
The purported iPad 3 LCD is the latest in a flurry of components claimed to show off parts from Apple's third-generation iPad. It comes on the heels of a photo claiming to show the back cover of the next-generation device, as well as another one that showed the inside of the back panel, suggesting the device will sport a larger battery.
The photos of the back panel suggest that the device will be nearly identical in form factor to the current iPad 2. But inside, the part shows signs that the LCD display, camera, and logic board have been redesigned, in addition to the prospect of a larger battery.
39 Comments
Sounds perfect. This will be my first iPad. Jealous of my wife's iPad 2, but I really want the 'near' Retina Display. The current iPads look 'fuzzy' next to my iPhone 4.
iPad 3, iPhone 5, maybe 'iTV' and 'Retina' MacBook Pros.
Can't wait. Saving my pennies...
is the hardware going to be powerfull enough to support it? dont desktops have trouble running games at even 30fps on resolutions that big?
"...a pixel density of around 260 pixels-per-inch, quadrupling the density found on the current iPad."
That's not quadrupling, it's doubling the density. Just because you double pixel dimensions doesn't mean you quadruple density. If density was quadrupled, that would have meant the iPad had a crappy 65dpi, which it doesn't.
Anyway, if true, good for Apple in obtaining another lcd supplier, which hopefully won't bite it's hand later... cough, cough, Samsung... cough...
You use an iPad further away from your eyes than an iPhone: those pixels will be impossible to discern too.
The "retina" qualifier relates not only to pixel density but also to distance to the eyes.. You can see the iPhone's pixels if you glue your face to it...
I could see Apple arguing you hold the iPad further away from your face (i.e. your eyes) than the iPhone and still marketing this as a retina display.