According to an analysis of top handset vendors' reported earnings by Horace Dediu of Asymco, the combined operating profits from all mobile phones remained relatively stagnant below $6 billion per quarter for years until the release of Apple's iPhone 4.
Over the last two years however, mobile profits have skyrocketed, jumping from $5.3 billion at the start of 2010 to $14.4 billion over the most recent quarter. The beneficiary of that explosion in mobile profits has almost exclusively been Apple.
Apart from Apple and its 73% share of mobile profits, Samsung has remained the only other major phone maker to continue capable of turning a profit in the industry since the release of the iconic iPhone, despite the voracious global demand for mobile phones, and in particular the highly profitable smartphone, which has seen its unit sales grow by 47%.
When Apple introduced the original iPhone in 2007, the market leader was overwhelmingly Nokia, but Samsung, Sony Ericsson, LG, RIM and HTC were all profitable. In the last quarter, Nokia reported its first major quarterly loss of $1.2 billion, while former industry darlings RIM and HTC also reported dismal performance. Sony Ericsson, Motorola and LG have all failed to earn significant profits in the mobile business since 2009 or earlier.
Dediu notes that Apple's recent surge in profits "were mostly carrier premiums for the iPhone 4S," and that mobile carriers "willingly hand over these premiums because the iPhone ensures a competitive advantage or preserves their customer base from churning. The calculations that go into a decision to range the iPhone are compelling enough that 250 operators made the decision (though, crucially, there are still 250 who have not)."
He further observed, "the industry is rewarding those who can supply computers-as-phones which preserve the cash flows of what is essentially a trillion dollar data services business. Vendors which cannot offer this solution saw their businesses implode. At least on the high end."
The site's review of mobile industry profits punches a hole in recent reports by a variety of market analysts that congratulated Samsung for shipping the most smartphone units, but also tears apart a theory by BITG Research analyst Walter Piecyk that suggested Apple was about to lose the carrier subsidies that have padded its bottom line over the past two years.
Following Piecyk's note to investors early last month, Apple's stock dropped nearly 12% before recovering after the company reported blockbuster quarterly earnings.
Apple shares currently remain at $581, significantly below the company's all time high of $644 reached in the days before Piecyk voiced his fears of an end to carrier's subsidy payments.
25 Comments
Apple Is Doomed.™ I want that on a t-shirt.
And I'm surprised that RIM just literally fell off last quarter.
Then Apple's shareholders are getting rich while Apple's users are paying too much for what they get.
Apple Is Doomed.™ I want that on a t-shirt.
And I'm surprised that RIM just literally fell off last quarter.
Let's fill in all of the responses for the Apple haters to save them time so they can try to come up with some more creative trolling:1. That's the Apple tax at work
2. Who cares about profits unless you're a stockholder?
3. So what? We're getting 800,000 activations per second.
4. Apple users are sheep (particularly fun when they can combine it with #3 while keeping a straight face)
5. The numbers must be lies. Everyone I know uses Android phones.
6. Even if it were true, so what? People need to be able to do whatever they want with their phones without Apple restricting their right to install malware.
Did I miss any?
Let's fill in all of the responses for the Apple haters to save them time so they can try to come up with some more creative trolling:1. That's the Apple tax at work
2. Who cares about profits unless you're a stockholder?
3. So what? We're getting 800,000 activations per second.
4. Apple users are sheep (particularly fun when they can combine it with #3 while keeping a straight face)
5. The numbers must be lies. Everyone I know uses Android phones.
6. Even if it were true, so what? People need to be able to do whatever they want with their phones without Apple restricting their right to install malware.
Did I miss any?
Why are you so quick to try and justify one company profiting so much?
The one answer is, just like all corporations, Apple is a faceless corporation, they only care about profit, and for the vast majority of people on this earth, they do not care how much money Apple is making, and in fact to a lot of people they will find it disgusting how much money Apple, and other corporations make on their products.
If you are an investor in Apple that's fine, maybe you enjoy this time of thing. If you are not an investor in Apple, and are still getting excited by this articule then maybe you should get out more.
Let's fill in all of the responses for the Apple haters to save them time so they can try to come up with some more creative trolling:1. That's the Apple tax at work
2. Who cares about profits unless you're a stockholder?
3. So what? We're getting 800,000 activations per second.
4. Apple users are sheep (particularly fun when they can combine it with #3 while keeping a straight face)
5. The numbers must be lies. Everyone I know uses Android phones.
6. Even if it were true, so what? People need to be able to do whatever they want with their phones without Apple restricting their right to install malware.
Did I miss any?
Why are you so quick to try and justify one company profiting so much?
The one answer is, just like all corporations, Apple is a faceless corporation, they only care about profit, and for the vast majority of people on this earth, they do not care how much money Apple is making, and in fact to a lot of people they will find it disgusting how much money Apple, and other corporations make on their products.
If you are an investor in Apple that's fine, maybe you enjoy this time of thing. If you are not an investor in Apple, and are still getting excited by this articule then maybe you should get out more.
Similarly, if you have an emotional attachment to the fortunes of Nokia, this report must be quite painful to read.