Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Broadcasters petition Supreme Court to hear case over iPad TV streamer Aereo

Last updated

Broadcasters in the United States have made good on their threat against Aereo, which rebroadcasts television content to iPad and iPhone owners, by petitioning for their case to be settled by the nation's highest court.

On Friday, The Hollywood Reporter revealed that Fox, ABC, Telemundo, NBC, PBS, and CBS had petitioned the Supreme Court to hear their ongoing case against Aereo, following failures to win injunctions against the service in the lower courts. The broadcasters allege unfair competition on the part of Aereo, as well as illegal appropriation of their content for Aereo's own purposes.

Aereo uses an array of micro-antennas to capture television broadcasts, which it then streams to iOS devices and PCs through a web portal. Aereo charges its subscribers $8 per month for access to the service. The broadcasters claim that this constitutes an infringement of their copyrights, as well as a violation of their performance rights.

The broadcasters' petition (embedded below) holds that Aereo's service is an illegal "public performance" of their protected content. Aereo claims that the thousands of antennas it assigns to each subscriber yield the same effect as if those subscribers had gone out and purchased an antenna for themselves.

Illustrative of the difficulties some content holders have had in adjusting to the decline of the standard distribution model, the case has resulted in wins and losses for both sides. For the most part, though, Aereo has been able to expand its offerings to new metropolitan areas with impunity. In April, a New York federal appeals court upheld a ruling that denied a prior motion by the broadcasters to shut Aereo down. Soon after, Aereo began expanding its service to even more locales. It is already available in New York, Miami, and Houston, and the company plans to be available in 20 more cities by the end of 2012.



71 Comments

cpsro 14 Years · 3239 comments

Here's hoping the broadcasters lose. I recently said b-bye to cable/satellite.

I love free over-the-air HD broadcasts (without Aereo) but would like someday to view broadcasts in other markets besides where I live. Right now, Aereo only offers service to local areas from local broadcasters, but if the company survives the present battle, I would expect it to expand its business into wide-area distribution of program material.

SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

There should be no public television regulated by government. All spectrum should be auctioned off.

christopher126 16 Years · 4366 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cpsro 
 

Here's hoping the broadcasters lose. I recently said b-bye to cable/satellite.

I love free over-the-air HD broadcasts (without Aereo) but would like someday to view broadcasts in other markets besides where I live.

Me too. I cut the cable 5 years ago and really miss watching F1.

 

But the cable companies charge way too much. Online viewing, Netflix, ATV...aren't quite there yet. I mainly rent DVD's from Redbox at a $1.00 ea.

 

I live in the mountains and can't over the air reception. So I hope Aereo works out.

daven 16 Years · 722 comments

Aero isn't useful for me as I'm not in one of their target markets but I use a video capture system to save what I want to see on my network drive and can then watch it wherever I want to. That said, I've only recorded three movies because there really isn't much I want to watch.