It would be "impossible" for Apple to successfully build a cheap iPhone without doing lasting damage to the company's highly profitable and successful smartphone brand, analyst Charlie Wolf of Needham & Company believes.
Wolf's thesis was presented on Wednesday in a note to investors, a copy of which was provided to AppleInsider. In it, the analyst went as far as to say that building a cheap iPhone to capture the low end of the smartphone market would be an "insane idea" for Apple, destroying the company's gross profits seen in its current strategy.
For example, to hit the so-called "sweet spot" of smartphone pricing in emerging markets, Apple would have to price a hypothetical cheap iPhone at around $350 without a carrier contract subsidy. If Apple were to target a hypothetical 40 percent gross margin with such a product, Wolf's estimates suggest the cheap iPhone would need a bill of materials at around $90 — Â or less than half the bill-of-materials cost of high-end iPhones.
Reaching a $350 iPhone price point while maintaining 40% margins would be impossible for Apple, analyst Charlie Wolf believes.
Wolf's estimates hinge on what he calculates to be a $120-per-phone "cost of goods sold" — Â costs associated with the iPhone that are not included in the bill of materials. These costs include warranty expenses, freight, packaging, telephone support, licensing fees and more.
Apple's current mid-range handset, the iPhone 5c, sells starting at $99 with a new two-year service contract, or $549 unlocked and contract-free. Wolf's calculations suggest the bill of materials for that handset is $165, plus the aforementioned $120 cost of other goods sold.
A total $285 cost on a $550 smartphone would result in gross margins of 48.2 percent, based on Wolf's estimate.
Because of these figures, the analyst doesn't believe that Apple will change its iPhone pricing, even as the maturing smartphone market inevitably becomes saturated, limiting growth potential. Wolf also doesn't believe that carriers in markets like the U.S., where contract subsidies are common, would begin cutting back on those subsidies, as executives at AT&T have suggested they will.
"The evidence suggests that Android users are switching to the iPhone in far greater numbers than users switching from the iPhone," Wolf wrote. "In a saturated market, we believe, if anything, that the migration of Android users to the iPhone will accelerate, absent significant price cuts on Android phones. Obviously, growth will slow. But we don't believe it will stop."
Rumors of a so-called low-cost iPhone have persisted for years, but they picked up steam last year when numerous reports consistently claimed Apple was planning to debut a new plastic-backed iPhone. With last September's launch of the iPhone 5c, the hardware side of those rumors proved accurate, but the $549 entry price was not the aggressively priced handset some Wall Street watchers were expecting.
Instead, some investors had hoped that Apple would price its new iPhone model as low as $400 without a contract subsidy. Some observers still believe Apple should react to cheaper Android-based devices in the smartphone space, and aggressively move into a lower-priced market with a new hardware model.
67 Comments
What he's actually saying is that building a cheap iPhone while keeping the same profit margin wouldn't be viable. None of his arguments rule out Apple producing a cheap iPhone with lower margins (that's not to say that there aren't arguments against it, but this isn't one of them).
edit: The recent article on App Store revenues breaking $10 billion is relevant here - with a low-cost device, the profit wouldn't be made on the hardware. It would be made on app / software / music sales, and also through longer-term sales due to ecosystem lock-in (get them into the Apple ecosystem with a cheap iPhone, and because moving to Android would cost them all their apps etc. you're very likely to have them hooked).
Another numbskull ANAL-yst giving his 2-cents, worthless as it is.
Apple will build an inexpensive iPhone when it can do so. This means it has to be an iPhone - with all that it means.
Apple actually already has been selling an inexpensive iPhone.
The iPhone 3G, 4, and 5c have been selling for FREE with a contract on many carriers. That is pretty cheap if ZERO is considered cheap.
but again wall street does not care if a company rips itself apart to gain the almighty no profit market share gold ring.
Another numbskull ANAL-yst giving his 2-cents, worthless as it is.
Apple will build an inexpensive iPhone when it can do so. This means it has to be an iPhone - with all that it means.
Apple actually already has been selling an inexpensive iPhone.
The iPhone 3G, 4, and 5c have been selling for FREE with a contract on many carriers. That is pretty cheap if ZERO is considered cheap.
Apple is not selling cheap phones, the service providers are still buy the phone from apple at full price, or at some discounted price. Also, it could be that apple does not get the full value of the phone until the 2 yrs of the contract is up. Apple could be subsidizing some portion of the purchase over time.
At one time it was believed that apple was getting some portion of the data contract over time since they were the enablers of the service providers ability to sell more expensive data contracts. This is also why no mater what if you have an iphone you have to have data plan whether you bought the phone outright or not.
It is the service providers selling cheap iphone to get someone hooked on a 2 yrs or longer data contract. Which is worth $720 to the provider.
I do t know if it is impossible for a cheap iPhone but it's highly unlikely. Apple isn't going to use inferior parts just to attract third world customers.