Victor Marks
This week on the AppleInsider podcast, Daniel Eran Dilger tells Victor Marks about why we shouldn't listen to supply chain forecasts with no byline, possible acquisitions, recent inventions, and making the 2017 iPhone from different materials.
AppleInsider editors Daniel Eran Dilger and Victor Marks wrap up the latest Apple Watch and iPhone releases:
- TSMC ups their forecast
- Supply chain reports indicate Apple market share grows in 2016, 2017
- iPhone 7 appears to cause sales spike, 2017 spike predicted
- Samsung v. Apple Supreme Court case
- Apple patents method for embedding light sensors directly onto device displays
- Apple patents 'super resolution' multi-sensor cameras with cube prisms
- 2017 iPhone materials
The show is available on iTunes and your favorite podcast apps by searching for "AppleInsider." Click here to listen, subscribe, and don't forget to rate our show.
Listen to the embedded SoundCloud feed below:
Show note links:
- Deals: Unlocked iPhone 7s in stock; $200 off 15" MacBook Pros; $250 off 8GB 13" MacBook Air; 27" iMac 5K (3.3GHz, 8GB, 2TB) for $1,900
- Apple chip supplier TSMC ups 2016 forecasts on sales likely linked to iPhone 7
- Supply chain reports claim Apple will gain smartphone marketshare in 2016, 2017
- Apple's iPhone 7 predicted to spur 8% growth, 2017 redesign seen causing 16% sales spike
- Full transcript of Apple v. Samsung Supreme Court hearing illustrates case complexities
- Analyst: Nikkei iPhone 6s supplier story says nothing of iPhone demand; site wrong before in 2013
- Apple patents method for embedding light sensors directly onto device displays
- Apple patents 'super resolution' multi-sensor cameras with cube prisms
Follow our hosts on Twitter: @danieleran and @vmarks.
Feedback and comments are always appreciated. Please contact the AppleInsider podcast at news@appleinsider.com and follow us on Twitter @appleinsider, plus Facebook and Instagram.
Those interested in sponsoring the show can reach out to us at advertising@appleinsider.com.
Stephen Silver
Christine McKee
Charles Martin
Amber Neely
3 Comments
Daniel was quite right about something that he stated about the Samsung / Apple case. Both parties were required to trim the number of patents involved, and now, Samsung is stating that Apple only has the "corners" and "screen" patents that will be the basis for Lower Court to adjust the award based on whatever new methodology and instructions that the Supreme Court will provide to the Lower Courts in June.
In essence, the legal system is so fucking slow to resolve patent infringements that Samsung will never owe a fraction of what it should be penalized for copying what was an obvious disruption that the iPhone created in the industry. That said, if Samsung had spent a fraction of the effort building the machine that Apple has created for product development, instead of copying and throwing features into their phones to see what sticks, they wouldn't be in the situation that they are now with the Note 7.
I was a little surprised that DED didn't have an article in response to Walt Mossberg's piece on theVerge critical of SIRI.
Especially after his June article "
WWDC 2016: Apple's Siri and the future of voice vs. Amazon's Alexa Echo, Google Now, Microsoft Cortana"
it will be interesting to see it the Google Assistant is a strong enough feature that it actually sells the Pixel.
Google has a long, long way to go show they really support their products. Maybe the will be lucky because Of Samsung 's problems.
unfortunately I've decided Siri only gets fixed and works if your name is Striesand or Mossberg.