Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple TV+ abandons Clooney and Pitt's 'Wolfs' sequel

Brad Pitt, George Clooney in the film "Wolfs." Image credit: Columbia Pictures / Courtesy Everett Collection

A planned sequel to the Apple TV+ original movie "Wolfs" has reportedly been dropped, marking another unexpected turn for both this film series, and for how it appears Apple is changing its movie ambitions.

Writer/director Jon Watts now says that he will not be doing a sequel, despite the first film's success. "[Apple] were extremely enthusiastic about it, and immediately commissioned me to start writing a sequel. But their last minute shift from a promised wide theatrical release to a streaming release was a total surprise and made without any explanation or discussion," he told industry publication Deadline.

"I was completely shocked and asked them to please not include the news that I was writing a sequel," Watts added. "They ignored my request and announced it in their press release anyway, seemingly to create a positive spin to their streaming pivot so I quietly returned the money they gave me for the sequel."

While never officially announced, the planned and reportedly greenlit "Wolfs 2" film was seen as a way to counter the poor publicity Apple had over its treatment of the original movie. Stars George Clooney and Brad Pitt both took substantial pay cuts in order to make sure this hitman action comedy got a wide theatrical release, which Apple initially planned.

However, shortly before release, Apple cut back its plans and instead gave it a single week in theaters. "Wolfs" would go on to be the most-watched Apple TV+ original film up to that point.

That streaming success could have made Apple reconsider its theatrical plans, especially for a sequel. However, Apple is said to have dramatically scaled back its slate following a series of high-cost flops, such as "Killers of the Flower Moon."

It's believed that Apple is waiting to see how its next major release, "F1" starring "Wolfs" co-lead Brad Pitt, fares in cinemas in summer 2025. Should that also fail to do well, Apple is expected to step away from high-budget fare and instead produce more films that are each lower cost.

The company may also choose to acquire finished movies instead of either producing itself, or being the sole investor in an independent production. Apple does already acquire films, with one of them being the acclaimed 2022 movie "CODA", which earned the first-ever Best Picture Oscar for a streamer.

"I loved working with Brad and George (and Amy and Austin and Poorna and Zlatko) and would happily do it again," said Watts, "but the truth is that Apple didn't cancel the Wolfs sequel, I did, because I no longer trusted them as a creative partner."

Deadline reports that sources within Apple continue to consider the film and success, and remain open to a sequel.



22 Comments

davebarnes 19 Years · 376 comments

So, is someone going to write an explanation of the [future] plot?
The cliffhanger at the end of episode 1 was truly annoying.

I am not surprised. It was terrible. I gave it 1 star on rotten Tomatoes.

iOS_Guy80 5 Years · 905 comments

So, is someone going to write an explanation of the [future] plot?
The cliffhanger at the end of episode 1 was truly annoying.

I am not surprised. It was terrible. I gave it 1 star on rotten Tomatoes.

The whole movie was annoying.

bloggerblog 16 Years · 2522 comments

It's hard to find original stories in movies nowadays, they all mirror older movies one way or another. Severance and Ted Lasso were great, but the others like Mosquito Coast and Silo had bad acting and felt amateurish. Anyway I know it's all subjective I know.

user1 2 Years · 7 comments

It would be beneficial for Apple to either discontinue releasing content to theaters or permit simultaneous release on digital platforms. Why? Vision Pro users anticipate content in either 3D or immersive video formats. However, this is not currently the case, as Apple TV+ does not offer 3D content. This omission raises questions about Apple’s vision for Vision Pro.

Is Apple abandoning its vision for Vision Pro? Apple’s services are not being enhanced by its future technology (VisionOS). Why is there no Vision Pro app for Apple News? Why are there fewer spatial or immersive games? As a consumer, I am perplexed by Apple’s objectives with VisionOS. Tim Cook appears to believe it is a niche for individuals seeking advanced technology today. However, the leadership’s strategy, messaging, and future direction lack clarity. It seems as though Vision Pro was a costly mistake for Apple. As a consumer, I envision Vision Pro as a tool that will enable me to contribute to society when my physical limitations confine me to bed.

I yearn for the magic and excitement I experienced with Apple products. I anticipate the introduction of a comprehensive suite of features. It occurred to me that this is why Apple introduces AI features gradually. These are the only features they have developed thus far. 

Pema 2 Years · 170 comments

Cancelled! The first one shouldn't have made it out the gate. Poor acting; poor script; poor cinematography. If It hadn't been for the two name actors it would have never made it to the highlights but been delegated to a daytime soap squashed between some lame talkshow and an afternoon gameshow.  >:)