Roger Fingas
The secretariat of South Korea's Fair Trade Commission has allegedly agreed to penalize Apple for foisting much of the burden of advertising and repairing iPhones to local carriers, according to a report.
The KFTC will only confirm any penalties — and their extent — within a few days of hearing from Apple, sources told The Korea Herald. As an example, the publication noted that carriers SKT, KT, and LG Uplus ran TV commercials for the iPhone 8 and X in November at the request of Apple, but at their own cost.
"When you see iPhone's TV commercials here, everything is the same except for a telecom operator's logo at the end of the commercials. Still, telecom firms should bear all the costs standing at billions of won," an anonymous carrier executive said.
The KFTC's investigation dates back to 2016. Apple's offices have been raided twice in the matter, once in June 2016 and again in November 2017, just ahead of the local launch of the iPhone X.
Apple is known to sometimes impose tough terms on carriers as a condition of selling iPhones, given that few are in a position to skip such popular products. In the case of South Korea, the KFTC has complained not just about marketing and repair costs but minimum purchase quotas, and even a moratorium against repair firms suing Apple Korea for a year after any dispute.
The company has apparently continued such practices despite blowback in other countries. Taiwan fined Apple $670,000 in 2013, and in 2016 France's competition agency launched a case that eventually hit Apple for over $55 million.
Last year the Russian government found Apple guilty of ordering price fixing by local retailers. Vendors that stepped out of line with Apple were threatened with losing their sales agreements.
Apple has had mixed luck with the KFTC. While the company's cooperation recently resulted in a ruling against Qualcomm, in 2014 the KFTC rejected an Apple complaint that Samsung was allegedly abusing a portfolio of standards-essential wireless patents in legal battles with rivals.
The Commission argued that Apple wasn't being sincere in negotiating a settlement with Samsung. It also noted that the iPhone maker was the first to file a patent suit.
-m.jpg)
Amber Neely
Malcolm Owen
Christine McKee
Chip Loder
Marko Zivkovic
Wesley Hilliard
18 Comments
Anyone else noticing a trend lately in the use of pejorative adjectives against Apple by AI writers? “Foisting” implies bad acting on Apple’s part. Later on in the article it’s described as “tough terms on carriers” because Apple’s products are desirable, must haves for carriers. And why shouldn’t Apple try to get the best terms possible when the carriers have the choice, especially in Korea, to just not sell Apple products? I smell collusion between Samsung and the KFTC.
If these carriers don't like Apple's terms, there's a simple answer to that. DON'T SELL THE IPHONE!!!!! Problem solved!!! Go sell the Samesung Phones. Why is this so hard. Everyone refuse to play around with Apple, Apple would in the end have to change their ways. My guess is Apple is finally taking a big enough chunk from Samesung to have a big enough effect to take notice.