Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple may return iOS to its original 'iPhone OS' name at WWDC

When Steve Jobs unveiled the iPhone, he said it ran OS X. On release, though, that was renamed "iPhone OS."

A prominent leaker claims Apple may revert to its original "iPhone OS" name for a forthcoming release of iOS, potentially to fit with iPadOS.

Prolific leaker Jon Prosser now claims that Apple is to launch some future version of iOS, possibly iOS 14, under the name "iPhone OS." This is the name that Apple used for the operating system on the original iPhone, and the change may be to align the branding with iPadOS.

"[The] iPhone runs OS X," said Steve Jobs at its unveiling in 2007. However, by the time the iPhone shipped, it was officially described as using iPhone OS. The name was changed to iOS in 2010 when the iPad was launched.

This new tweet is one of Prosser's shortest leaks, with no details or comment beyond the words "iPhone OS." Given that WWDC 2020 begins on June 22, and Apple is due to announce the next version of iOS there, it's most likely that this is when such a change would be made, if at all.

Apple did unveil iPadOS at its WWDC 2019. That was simultaneously a new name and a new fork for the operating system that will see it develop separately from iOS.

If the shift is accurate, it isn't clear what will happen to the name of the operating system for iPod touch, or if it too will run iPhone OS.



26 Comments

Rayz2016 8 Years · 6957 comments

Makes sense to bringing the naming into line, I suppose.

razorpit 17 Years · 1793 comments

Surprised this didn't happen last year.

OutdoorAppDeveloper 15 Years · 1292 comments

Splitting your operating system into device specific versions is easy. Making one single operating system that works everywhere is hard. Microsoft has been trying (and failing) to do that for decades. Apple had a real chance with iOS. They could have had Apple OS that worked on iPhones, iPads, Macs, the Apple Watch and future devices like their AR glasses. Each device could have tailored the UI to its own needs. But that would have been hard. Instead now we have iPhone OS, iPad OS, Watch OS, Mac OS and soon Glass OS. Such a missed opportunity.

randominternetperson 8 Years · 3101 comments

Splitting your operating system into device specific versions is easy. Making one single operating system that works everywhere is hard. Microsoft has been trying (and failing) to do that for decades. Apple had a real chance with iOS. They could have had Apple OS that worked on iPhones, iPads, Macs, the Apple Watch and future devices like their AR glasses. Each device could have tailored the UI to its own needs. But that would have been hard. Instead now we have iPhone OS, iPad OS, Watch OS, Mac OS and soon Glass OS. Such a missed opportunity.

Missed opportunity to be able to make an interesting, but ultimately irrelevant, claim.  Personally, I trust that Apple knows best which approach is easier/better to maintain.

Rayz2016 8 Years · 6957 comments

Splitting your operating system into device specific versions is easy. Making one single operating system that works everywhere is hard. Microsoft has been trying (and failing) to do that for decades. Apple had a real chance with iOS. They could have had Apple OS that worked on iPhones, iPads, Macs, the Apple Watch and future devices like their AR glasses. Each device could have tailored the UI to its own needs. But that would have been hard. Instead now we have iPhone OS, iPad OS, Watch OS, Mac OS and soon Glass OS. Such a missed opportunity.

You've got that backward.

Making a single operating system that works everywhere is easy. 

Deciding that doing so would compromise your customer experience so you're better off building three operating systems derived from the same base … that's hard.

Windows Mobile failed because Microsoft believed that their customers wanted the Windows experience on a mobile device. They were wrong.