Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Tim Cook says privacy 'one of the top issues of the century'

Last updated

Apple CEO Tim Cook in an interview on Thursday called privacy, specifically data privacy, one of the most important issues of our time.

Speaking with Fast Company, Cook placed privacy on the same echelon as dire worldwide problems such as climate change.

"In terms of privacy — I think it is one of the top issues of the century," Cook said. "We've got climate change — that is huge. We've got privacy — that is huge. . . . And they should be weighted like that and we should put our deep thinking into that and to decide how can we make these things better and how do we leave something for the next generation that is a lot better than the current situation."

He went on to illustrate the importance of data privacy tools like Apple's upcoming App Tracking Transparency feature. Due for release this spring, the new affordance will opt users out of ad tracking by default and require developers to ask permission before leveraging tracking technology.

"I try to get somebody to think about what happens in a world where you know that you're being surveilled all the time. What changes do you then make in your own behavior? What do you do less of? What do you not do anymore? What are you not as curious about anymore if you know that each time you're on the web, looking at different things, exploring different things, you're going to wind up constricting yourself more and more and more and more? That kind of world is not a world that any of us should aspire to.

And so I think most people, when they think of it like that . . . start thinking quickly about, Well, what am I searching for? I look for this and that. I don't really want people to know I'm looking at this and that, because I'm just curious about what it is' or whatever. So it's this change of behavior that happens that is one of the things that I deeply worry about, and I think that everyone should worry about it."

Threats by law enforcement agencies and governments to weaken end-to-end encryption are also a worry.

"You know, I'm a big believer in encryption— in end-to-end encryption with no back doors— and so I do worry about anyone trying to break that in any kind of way or weaken it in any kind of way," Cook said.

Cook was also asked to comment on "Big Tech," a term synonymous with companies like Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook, firms that have become a political punching bag over the past few years for their pervasive presence in everyday life. The executive cautioned against "broad-brush categorization" and encourages people to judge each company individually based on business model, conduct and values.

On artificial intelligence, a technology that Tesla founder Elon Musk believes will be the downfall of humanity, Cook seemed less than concerned.

"I think both of those can be used for bad things and can be amplified by technology," Cook said of AI and privacy. "And so which one is above the other one? I don't know. I would say we can't let ourselves just choose one of those two to focus on. We have to have ethical AI, just like we have to have ethical data privacy and data collection. There's an intersection of those two as well, right? Both are paramount and have to be worked on."

The Apple chief retread ground covered in today's speech presented to at the European Computers, Privacy & Data Protection (CPDP) conference, from technology's role in fostering ideological extremism to privacy legislation like the European Union's GDPR.



14 Comments

jdw 18 Years · 1457 comments

Until the Capitol attack I might have agreed.  Now the new issue skyrocketing to the "top" is freedom of speech without censorship by Big Brother or Big Tech.  

The very existence of social media shows just how much people like to speak.  People are wanting to speak so badly that they willingly use FaceBook despite the data privacy concerns that Apple has touted.  The desire to speak freely, both in terms of being "without restraint" and "free of charge," is only going to increase as overbearing moderation and deplatforming increases.  

Free speech always comes with risks, but in the end that freedom is worth it.  Having free speech and the freedom to choose to opt in or out of ad tracking and data sharing are both very necessary. 

mjtomlin 20 Years · 2690 comments

jdw said:
Until the Capitol attack I might have agreed.  Now the new issue skyrocketing to the "top" is freedom of speech without censorship by Big Brother or Big Tech.  

The very existence of social media shows just how much people like to speak.  People are wanting to speak so badly that they willingly use FaceBook despite the data privacy concerns that Apple has touted.  The desire to speak freely, both in terms of being "without restraint" and "free of charge," is only going to increase as overbearing moderation and deplatforming increases.  

Free speech always comes with risks, but in the end that freedom is worth it.  Having free speech and the freedom to choose to opt in or out of ad tracking and data sharing are both very necessary. 

Freedom of speech is only guaranteed by the constitution in so much that it prohibits government institutions (Big Brother) from censoring citizens, within certain limitations. Private institutions (Big Tech) do not guarantee such freedoms and do not have to. You cannot have it both ways, less moderation without increased protections from being held liable. That would spell the end these private social networks. Moderation is completely necessary to keep conversations civil and make sure they remain on point.

Ad tracking is a necessary evil of advertising, abuse of it has become the main problem. Whether a user opts in or out does not prevent this from continuing. But what Apple is trying to do is force developers to be more transparent about what and how user data is being used to track them. The user is then free to make an informed decision to continue to use that app, or service, or website, or whatever.

Rick601 6 Years · 19 comments

Tim should asterisk all his comments on privacy with *except for China. China of course is a totalitarian communist nation where it’s citizens are surveilled 24 hours a day with no privacy from the Govt.  Citizens are routinely disappeared and they currently have 1-2 million in concentration camps in the western provinces.  But hey, they love our iPhones.  

davgreg 9 Years · 1050 comments

Privacy should be non-negotiable.

And the moment the new feature is available it gets turned on. I pay plenty for my internet connectivity and for content via subscriptions- advertisers and data miners can go to hell. I hate intrusive advertising, which is most of it.

And Facebook has no ground to stand on. They could go away tomorrow and I do not think the world would be a worse place because of it.

auxio 19 Years · 2766 comments

mjtomlin said:
jdw said:
Until the Capitol attack I might have agreed.  Now the new issue skyrocketing to the "top" is freedom of speech without censorship by Big Brother or Big Tech.  

The very existence of social media shows just how much people like to speak.  People are wanting to speak so badly that they willingly use FaceBook despite the data privacy concerns that Apple has touted.  The desire to speak freely, both in terms of being "without restraint" and "free of charge," is only going to increase as overbearing moderation and deplatforming increases.  

Free speech always comes with risks, but in the end that freedom is worth it.  Having free speech and the freedom to choose to opt in or out of ad tracking and data sharing are both very necessary. 
Moderation is completely necessary to keep conversations civil and make sure they remain on point.

Moderation is necessary to prevent comments which, if made in person, could be construed as criminal threatening.  Just as it isn't acceptable to directly threaten violence in real life, it isn't acceptable to do it online.  I'm not sure how people think that they have the right to say things online which they could be charged for in real life.  There's a reason why we have these laws in society, and they should apply equally online.

Beyond threats of violence, I understand the frustration with moderation.  But as everyone says, these are platforms created by private companies, not the government.  So the expectation that you can do anything you like on a privately owned platform is unrealistic.  Especially when it's on public display.  Usually you can say anything you like in DMs/private messages (aside from violent threats), but once you post it publicly for everyone to see, then you're subject to moderation.  It's not so different from being able to have crude or defamatory posters displayed in your home, but not on publicly displayed billboards.