Apple will soon release a software update that will allow iPhone 13 models to get their screens replaced at third-party repair shops more easily.
Currently, third-party screen repairs will break Face ID functionality on iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro models. That's because of a tiny chip that pairs the display to the device.
The company told The Verge on Wednesday that a software update is on the way that will make third-party display swaps easier.
As detailed by repair specialists iFixit, display repairs are complicated now because the aforementioned chip serializes a screen to an iPhone. Because of that, swapping a screen requires technicians remove the chip and solder it onto a new screen — a complicated and expensive procedure.
Apple's upcoming update will do away with the serializing, though details about how are scarce. Presumably, however the fix will allow independent repair shops and consumers to swap a screen without Face ID becoming broken.
The serialization chip stirred controversy in the repair community, since screen swaps are among the most common repairs made to devices. It isn't clear if the anti-repair behavior was intentional, since a source within Apple said it would be "fixed" at a later date.
It isn't clear when the software update will arrive, but it will likely be a point release for iOS 15.
5 Comments
Sounds like Apple got a nastygram from the FTC.
Excellent, good job Apple.
I see that Louis Rossmann made his comment about FaceID being disabled after the iPhone 13 screen has been replaced.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqzEltEHgrg
Still no word on why a serial code chip is even necessary for the display.
There's a lot of stuff that doesn't make sense here. Adding such encoding adds expense and complexity to the part and is additional coding with the OS. Why would Apple go to the trouble of doing this? Either for financial gain to preserve repair business or for security purposes. Most people claim that Apple does not make significant money on repairs, but if it truly was for legitimate security purpose, why would they disable it?