Apple has made several additions to its Worldwide Developers Conference website, most notably a time schedule showing that the opening Keynote address will run a considerable three hours.
During this year's presentation, however, Jobs is widely expected to fill in the missing pieces — or "Top Secret Features" — of its latest operating system overhaul, Mac OS X 10.5 "Leopard." These may include a Google-styled geographical mapping application with GPS support, VoIP iChat telephony, and a version of Boot Camp featuring embedded virtualization support.
Early rumors surrounding Leopard had suggested that Apple was grooming its Boot Camp solution into a rival of Microsoft's own Virtual PC virtualization software, which would essentially allow Mac users to run Windows and Mac OS X applications simultaneously.
For its part, Apple has continually denied such claims through comments to members of the analyst community. "Absolutely not," was the response from Apple Senior Vice President Phil Schiller, when asked last July by a Needham & Co. analyst if the company planned to include a virtualization solution with Leopard. Apple's leadership expressed a similar view during a meeting with Bear Stearns in December. There, the company indicated that it is very pleased with Parallels' third party solution and didn't feel the need to compete with its own solution.
At the same time, there has been a steady stream of evidence to suggest that Apple may not be telling the whole truth when it comes to its plans for Boot Camp — and it wouldn't be the first time the company's leadership intentionally mislead the analyst community. Of the claims published in a recent DigiTimes piece, one suggested that Mac maker would delay Leopard's release till October in order to fine tune an "integrated" version of Boot Camp that would allow Mac users to more easily run Microsoft's Vista operating system. Apple initially denied the report, but pulled an about-face just weeks later, conceding that it would need until October to finishing the Leopard release.
There's also no concrete explanation as to why Apple's enterprise division, which has seemingly obtained Parallels' customer list, has been routinely phoning those customers to find out how they're using the Parallels Desktop software for Mac in the enterprise.
In delaying Leopard last week, Apple did make one thing certain: developers and industry watchers should have the full skinny on its plans for Leopard by the close of Jobs' keynote presentation on June 11th at the WWDC '07.
"We now plan to show our developers a near final version of Leopard at the conference, give them a beta copy to take home so they can do their final testing, and ship Leopard in October," the Cupertino-based company wrote in an official statement. "We think it will be well worth the wait."
43 Comments
50% longer presentation. Nice!
Let the speculation begin....
is it just me or is AppleInsider giving DigiTimes a little more respect recently. There was no disclaimer about how DigiTimes is usually full of it at the end of the article.
I will be flabbergasted if they include Windows virtualization in Leopard. Although, since mac users will still have to BUY windows in order to run anything, there won't be a big shift towards people downloading windows programs simply because they can. And developers shouldn't get lazy since it won't be actively used except by those who really need it and are willing to fork over the money to buy Windows.
Two hours of the presentation will be Steve demoing a full restore using Time Machine.
The capacity crowd will be on the edge of its seat as the progress bar march towards completion.
This article did focus a lot on virtualization, but I doubt Jobs is going to talk for 3 hours *just* on virtualization and hidden leopard features. What else could be taking up that time? iLife, iWork? or are those hanging on Leopard's release?
I will be flabbergasted if they include Windows virtualization in Leopard
Me too. Apple is doing great without having to support a less than stellar OS setup inside of OS X. I can't imagine Apple going to all that trouble.