TechCrunch's MG Siegler reports Facebook is coordinating the effort in order to maintain control over web apps without having to submit to the App Store terms. According to people familiar with the project, Facebook hopes "to use Appleâs own devices against them to break the stranglehold they have on mobile app distribution."
Interestingly enough, Apple initially pushed the concept of web apps for mobile Safari on the iPhone, but eventually switched to the App Store model in 2008.
Siegler, who claims to have seen the project with his own eyes, describes "Project Spartan" as a mobile web version of Facebook with drop-down menus for new apps. Once loaded, those apps would be surrounded by a "Facebook wrapper" that would integrate with the social network, adding features such as Credits, the company's micropayment system.
Credits play a vital role in the in-development platform, as they would provide an alternative method for monetization to the App Store. Facebook is reportedly wooing third-party developer Zynga to the platform in hopes of accelerating the transition away from Adobe Flash and toward HTML5.
Though the project will serve to reduce developer reliance on Adobe Flash for gaming, "the real goal is to get people using Facebook as the distribution model for games and other apps, not the App Store (or any other distribution hub)," Siegler wrote.
Facebook began offering an app for the iPhone and iPod touch when the App Store launched, but has yet to release a native iPad app.
Apple and Facebook have cooperated in the past, but last year, Apple CEO Steve Jobs revealed that he was unable to agree upon a deal to tie the company's Ping music-centered social network into Facebook because of "onerous terms." According to one person familiar with the matter, the two companies were in talks for 18 months before negotiations broke down.
Last October, reports emerged that Jobs had invited Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg over for dinner to discuss the matter.
Some analysts view Apple's recent partnership with Twitter to provide system-wide integration in iOS 5 as a snub to Facebook. In April, a purported early "test version" of iOS 4 was spotted with system-level Facebook integration, fueling speculation that Facebook may have been Apple's "first choice" over Twitter.
133 Comments
Do HTML5 webapps respond to iOS push notifications? I was under the impression that they do not, however it would be great if someone more knowledgeable than me about such matters clarify this topic.
"Facebook hopes "to use Apple?s own devices against them to break the stranglehold they have on mobile app distribution."
Apple failed (relatively speaking, anyway) with Ping because they stepped well beyond their realm of expertise. Now Facebook's trying to play on Apple's turf. Here come da fail.
"Facebook hopes "to use Apple?s own devices against them to break the stranglehold they have on mobile app distribution."
Apple failed (relatively speaking, anyway) with Ping because they stepped well beyond their realm of expertise. Now Facebook's trying to play on Apple's turf. Here come da fail.
Ping also sounded like Bing. Not perhaps the happiest coincidence.
Lolwut? Like web apps are somehow new, and are somehow a threat to iOS native apps. Anyway, if this framework will be as riddled with security and privacy problems as Facebook's own platform, no thanks.
TechCrunch's MG Siegler reports Facebook is coordinating the effort in order to maintain control over web apps without having to submit to the App Store terms. According to people familiar with the project, Facebook hopes "to use Apple?s own devices against them to break the stranglehold they have on mobile app distribution."
And I'm pretty sure Apple is just fine with it. They've always said HTML5/Javascript/AJAX is perfectly legitimate way to develop iPhone apps. I don't see how anyone is using it "against" Apple.