The New York Times presented on Saturday a close look at the Cupertino, Calif., company's move toward foreign production. The article was based on more than three dozen interviews with current and former Apple employees and contractors, as well as talks with "economists, manufacturing experts, international trade specialists, technology analysts, academic researchers, employees at Appleâs suppliers, competitors and corporate partners, and government officials."
According to the report, Apple holds a "central conviction" that overseas production facilities offer scale, flexibility, diligence and skilled workers that U.S. factories are no longer able to match.
Authors Charles Duhigg and Keith Bradsher related an anecdote from a dinner last February with President Barack Obama, Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, and several other tech luminaries. Obama reportedly asked Jobs why Apple is unable to to bring is manufacturing back to the U.S.
A guest at the dinner noted that Jobs candidly replied, "Those jobs aren't coming back."
Though Apple employs 43,000 people in the U.S., twice as many as it does overseas, some have criticized the company for not creating more jobs in its home country. The report noted that an additional 700,000 people work on Apple's products via the company's network of contractors, but most of them are located outside of the U.S.
âAppleâs an example of why itâs so hard to create middle-class jobs in the U.S. now,â said Jared Bernstein, a former economic adviser to the White House.
Jobs and President Obama at a dinner last year.
But, the company's executives have indicated that moving work overseas is their only option. A former executive recounted an instance prior to the launch of the original iPhone where 8,000 employees were woken up in the middle of the night to begin outfitting glass screens, a last-minute addition for the handset. Within just a few days, the factory was producing more than 10,000 iPhones a day.
âThe speed and flexibility is breathtaking,â the executive said. âThereâs no American plant that can match that.â
Sources revealed that the last-minute adjustment came about because Jobs demanded a change in the iPhone just weeks before its scheduled launch. He had reportedly noticed that the keys in his pockets had scratched a prototype device he had been testing.
âI wonât sell a product that gets scratched,â Jobs was noted as saying. âI want a glass screen, and I want it perfect in six weeks.â
One Apple executive left the meeting and quickly booked a flight to Shenzhen, China to address the issue, according to the report.
Betsey Stevenson, the Labor Department's chief economist until last year, said U.S. companies used to prioritize American workers even when it meant higher costs. âThatâs disappeared," she said. "Profits and efficiency have trumped generosity.â
But, others took issue with the claim, noting that workers with the mid-level skills required for factory work are in short supply in the U.S.
One Apple executive defended Apple's decision to produce iPhones overseas by noting that the device is sold in more than a hundred countries. âWe donât have an obligation to solve Americaâs problems. Our only obligation is making the best product possible,â the executive said.
âWe shouldnât be criticized for using Chinese workers,â one current Apple executive told the publication. âThe U.S. has stopped producing people with the skills we need.â
The company did, however, used to pride itself on making its products at home. For instance, Jobs told the Times in 1984 that the first Macintosh was "a machine that is made in America."
Tim Cook, Apple's former chief operations officer and current chief executive officer, has been credited with developing Apple's overseas supply chain. One former high-ranking executive said that Cook decided to move much of its manufacturing to Asia because it can "scale up and down faster" and "Asian supply chains have surpassed what's in the U.S."
âThe entire supply chain is in China now,â said a different former Apple executive. âYou need a thousand rubber gaskets? Thatâs the factory next door. You need a million screws? That factory is a block away. You need that screw made a little bit different? It will take three hours.â
Apple manufacturing partner Foxconn has risen to become a giant in the industry. The company is estimated to assemble 40 percent of the world's consumer electronics.
âThey could hire 3,000 people overnight,â said Jennifer Rigoni, who served as Appleâs worldwide supply demand manager until 2010. âWhat U.S. plant can find 3,000 people overnight and convince them to live in dorms?â
"Appleâs executives had estimated that about 8,700 industrial engineers were needed to oversee and guide the 200,000 assembly-line workers eventually involved in manufacturing iPhones," the report read.
The effort took just 15 days in China, compared to estimates by Apple's analysts that it would take nine months to find the necessary workers in the U.S.
Economists expect that the U.S. economy will adapt and find a way to replace some of the middle-class jobs it has lost overseas, but they warn that some workers, especially older ones, could be left behind during the transition.
âNew middle-class jobs will eventually emerge,â said Lawrence Katz, a Harvard economist. âBut will someone in his 40s have the skills for them? Or will he be bypassed for a new graduate and never find his way back into the middle class?â
For its part, Apple has lobbied the government to allow a tax holiday that would allow it and other American corporations to bring home overseas cash. The WIN America lobbying group, which Apple supports, argues that doing so would allow the companies to create more jobs in the U.S. Two-thirds of the iPhone maker's $81 billion cash hoard is currently located overseas.
148 Comments
maybe wrong link
Seriously there are good reasons to wake somebody in the middle of the night, sticking screens on iPhones isn't one of them. I smell a workers revolt coming to China.
They are right about one thing though, it would be very hard to find Americans willing to work with those sorts of expectations. Who would want to be packed in a dorm just to have a job.
If Apple could first create assembly factories in the USA and then gradually move the parts manufacturing here it would get the ball rolling. If they started the assembly here, local companies would spring up to supply parts. That is how it works. That is how it works in China too. Apple could take the first step by assembling iPods here and then other products.
It would take much less money to ship containers of parts to the USA than individually boxed products. In time those parts would be coming from within the USA.
All of the benefits Apple claims are in China would become the norm in the USA in time.
From the article:
"One Apple executive defended Apple's decision to produce iPhones overseas by noting that the device is sold in more than a hundred countries. ?We don?t have an obligation to solve America?s problems. Our only obligation is making the best product possible,? the executive said." It is true that there is no morality requirement within any corporate structure. That comes form leadership. Leaders show us their morality in the ways they operate their businesses. Apple claims a moral high ground every time they proclaim how environmentally friendly their products are made. They do that also when they look into labor practices in China and publicize it. So when an Apple executive says they don't have an obligation to solve Americas problems, it is a lapse in moral judgement.
If Apple wants to play the morals game, then they should be all in and start helping the nation where they sell their products. I know that China is the new market that will dwarf the US market soon. If they want to abandon the USA then they might as well move all of Apple to China. At least that way they can claim to be supporting their home country. I wonder what the Chinese government would do to Apple if it were based there. Would they start ordering Apple to make products for the government for free? Would they tell Apple it could no longer sell the good products to the foreign markets? Who knows what a communist government would do to them.
Apple has freedom in the USA. They should support that freedom by manufacturing products in the USA.
So when an Apple executive says they don't have an obligation to solve Americas problems, it is a lapse in moral judgement.
When someone thinks that solving America's problems is more important than caring about problems all around the world, ignoring the problems of Chinese workers who might become equally as unemployed, for instance, or the benefits Apple has given to those people who are generally worse off than the residents of Flint, Michigan, then I think there has been a lapse of moral judgment. If you want to talk about patriotism, go right ahead. If you want to talk about morality, however, I think you're missing something.
Just suggesting that other countries have more skill to produce stuff then other countries is plain racism. Its ok as long as the racism is against "western" countries.
There is nothing that the chinese can manufacture that US/EU can't manufacture at the same/better quality. The problem is regulations and corrupt governments that are in the corporations pockets.
Outsourcing is one of the most destructive things to western countries. Just look at the rise of Samsung and HTC. Both companies started as OEMs to westerns companies. Then they figured out that they could use the same devices and put their own brand in on them. They have no culture of innovation, but great culture of OEMing.
The people who write these reports show the same self hate as many other seems to have.
These kinds of reports would never be published in non western countries. Not even in countries that are in the stone age.
Nationalism is good. Its time to bring back EU/USA jobs home. Our politicians job is to make it possible. Education/taxes/permits. Instead our politicians are today like Football teams. Some cheer for one team, and others for the other. Almost like religion. *hint* No politic ideology is 100% right, every single issue should be addressed by facts and evidence. Not team ideology like today. That is why no one should have a "party" that they vote for.