John Gruber of Daring Fireball believes that if Apple does produce a so-called "iPad mini" for sale this year, it will use the same display as the iPhone 3GS. That's because LCD screens are manufactured in large sheets and are then cut to the size needed, allowing the company to more easily produce 7.85-inch displays with a 1,024-by-768-pixel resolution.
"These are displays Apple knows they can produce efficiently and in enormous quantities," Gruber wrote on Wednesday. "All they have to do is cut them into bigger pieces."
The comments came in response to a pair of reports (1, 2) from Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal that indicated Apple is planning to launch a smaller iPad, with a screen sized between 7 and 8 inches, before the end of 2012. Bloomberg's report cited an anonymous source who indicated the smaller, cheaper iPad will not feature a high-resolution screen like the 9.7-inch Retina display found on Apple's third-generation iPad.
But by sticking to a resolution of 1,024 by 768, Apple would allow existing applications written for the first-generation iPad and iPad 2 to run natively on the device with no changes necessary. That's because the rumored 7.85-inch display would pack in the same number of pixels as Apple's first two iPad models with larger 9.7-inch screens.
At 7.85 inches diagonally, the height of an "iPad mini" would be roughly the same as the width of the current iPad.
Current iPad displaying approximate relative screen size of a rumored 7.85-inch "iPad mini."
The iPhone 3GS features a 3.5-inch display with a resolution of 480 by 320 pixels. That's the same resolution screen that was found in the preceding models, the iPhone 3G and the first-generation iPhone.
The iPhone 3GS screen technology has a pixel density of 163 per inch, while the new third-generation iPad squeezes 264 pixels-per-inch into its 9.7-inch screen.
Gruber first indicated in April that Apple was "noodling with" ideas and prototypes for a 7.85-inch iPad, though he cautioned at the time that he's unsure whether such a device would ever actually be released. His most recent comments were made in response to this week's mainstream media reports.
83 Comments
I hope people finally understand where the 7.85" screen size comes from.
At 7.85 inches in diameter, the height of an "iPad mini" would be roughly the same as the width of the current iPad.
7.85 inches in diameter? A circular iPad? That would be neat !
7.85 inches in diameter? A circular iPad? That would be neat !
Yeah. It's stuff like this that makes me feel sad for the human race.
Diagonal is not diameter.
[quote name="SolipsismX" url="/t/151091/ipad-mini-predicted-to-use-same-display-tech-as-apples-iphone-3gs#post_2140336"]I hope people finally understand where the 7.85" screen size comes from.[/quote] I didn't know. I've never seen any remark on the significance of that exact dimension before. Using the same substrate as the 3GS makes sense, given that it will have to be a more budget panel to fit a budget price. The suggestion that the mini's largest dimension is similar to half the iPad's smallest dimension is off by almost half an inch.
Very interesting commentary on the manufacturing process. Was not aware of the "ease of size configuration" with that manufacturing process. Thanks for the info.
7.85 diagonal would make a great siri enabled Apple TV remote control device for the coffee table in the living room home theater................
I would get the smaller iPad mini to go with my current iPad3 which is awesome btw.....!