Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Editorial: Apple isn't revamping its HomeKit team, but maybe it should

HomePod and the "Works with HomeKit" logo

Last updated

Bloomberg believes that Apple is hiring people to overhaul how the company's HomeKit devices work with third-party products. The report is based on disprovable information, yet it is true that Apple both should and could do much more with the technology.

According to Bloomberg, Apple is currently hiring a new team of engineers to revamp its HomeKit offerings. Reportedly, it's because Apple has fallen behind Amazon and Google in the smart home field.

The report seems to be extrapolated chiefly from recruitment ads on Apple's official jobs board, and that's unsteady ground. Bloomberg says 15 HomeKit jobs have been posted in the last month, although the site is currently showing only 12. Of all HomeKit jobs posted at any time and still available, there are 26.

AppleInsider, and others, have been tracking Apple's job HomeKit job postings for years. The claim that 15 is notable for the last month is wrong. Apple consistently posts around this number of HomeKit-related jobs per month, with 30 available at any given time. These numbers have been steady for over a year, and were higher in 2017.

Then Bloomberg belabors that the posts are all for engineers, but goes on to justify this with details about jobs that are clearly not engineering. While some ask for experience in developing wireless, battery powered devices, others are about supply chain expertise. Like they have always been.

Similarly, Bloomberg claims that the overall aim of the new team is specifically to get more third-party companies to develop products that work with Apple's HomeKit technology. That may very well involve engineers, but you have to think they're more likely to be needed at these third-party firms than at Apple.

One of the current HomeKit-related jobs posted on Apple's recruitment site. One of the current HomeKit-related jobs posted on Apple's recruitment site.

Bloomberg does also claim that sources have told it the company is directly headhunting potential candidates. But, it always does this in every field it works in. Furthermore, another unnamed source reportedly says that Apple previously had a team working on creating its own smart home devices such as doors, but suspended the work.

A source within Apple corporate not authorized to speak on behalf of the company told AppleInsider that "there have been no notable changes to the HomeKit development team."

Only, maybe there should be.

Talking more about HomeKit

Bloomberg is right that HomeKit devices lag far behind Amazon's Echo and Google's Home ones. We might wish that both of those companies were more privacy and security conscious as Apple is, but if you pick up a smart device, it's certainly going to work with them.

And whatever the smart device is that you want, there will be an Amazon and a Google one, there may well not be an Apple HomeKit one. That's particularly true internationally, but even within the US, your range of products is quite limited.

Apple has made a move that could be designed to help this. It's announced HomeKit Secure Video as part of iOS 13, which will store your security footage on Apple's servers. That will unquestionably make HomeKit cameras more appealing to buyers because it will doubtlessly be convenient, plus it's easier to trust Apple with your footage than it is an unknown third-party.

Note the Ikea says its smart blinds will work with HomeKit - but not yet. You can bet they work with Alexa, though.

Yet although firms such as Logitech have said that they will support HomeKit Secure Video, it's not likely to see a rush of vendors. That's because home security firms don't just rely on selling you a camera, they need you to buy services such as footage storage and retrieval.

If Apple made a camera, you'd call HomeKit Security Video a killer feature, especially as a certain amount of the storage will be free if you already pay for extra iCloud storage.

What it needs is HomeKit evangelism, like how it sold Macs back in the day.

And then, there's the AirPort

Where Apple could make a killer feature that made HomeKit more appealing and yet didn't drive away other vendors, is in its existing products.

The Apple TV and HomePod, for instance, are already able to act as a HomeKit hub in your house. It's there, it's plugged in, it's working with HomeKit. What would it take for Apple to embed a mesh Wi-Fi system into that same hardware.

Along with that, Apple could make Wi-Fi routers again. Even if these somehow weren't as typically easy to use as most Apple gear, the fact that they won't be spying on you, and could have guaranteed HomeKit certification including HomeKit Camera support are huge things.

Bloomberg's report today appears to be wrong, like its famously poor reporting on the iCloud spy chip debacle. But, that doesn't mean that consumers wouldn't benefit from a little HomeKit attention.

Keep up with AppleInsider by downloading the AppleInsider app for iOS, and follow us on YouTube, Twitter @appleinsider and Facebook for live, late-breaking coverage. You can also check out our official Instagram account for exclusive photos.



19 Comments

razorpit 17 Years · 1793 comments

"Apple could make Wi-Fi routers again" oh don't go with that crazy talk. All the smart people here know "Apple isn't in the router business because it is a category well served."  ;)

Apple exiting this market is one of the dumbest things they've done recently. Sure they aren't making millions from it but it sure can help them sell the message of we care about your privacy... Stupid, stupid, bean counters.

davgreg 9 Years · 1050 comments

I have pretty much given up on HomeKit ands it did not have to be this way.

Exactly why cannot the 100 million Macintosh computers- many of which are sitting on desks in homes - cannot be used as a hub for HomeKit? It makes a lot more sense to use a desktop Mac than have to use the Apple TV or an iPad. And the question about dropping AirPort when it would have made a good HomeKit hub is also valid.

I have no doubt that Tim Cook is a smart guy and well intentioned, but I wonder if he has the vision or the passion to see this stuff live up to the promise and potential.

hammeroftruth 16 Years · 1356 comments

Based on reading reviews for devices that work for Alexa and Google, the grass isn’t greener on their side either. For those of you who use Homekit and are frustrated over intermittent access and other issues can be assured that your experience isn’t any better using competing systems.

I believe part of the problem is that Homekit and Siri are two different teams and should be combined into 1 big team to fix issues where Siri can’t see Homekit hardware, but the Home app can. Also with iOS 13, I have noticed it takes much longer for Homekit to update the status of the devices. 

Hopefully any new talent can give Apple insight and perspective on how to improve Homekit and give the Apple bean counters a reason to invest heavily into it if a reliable service comes out of it. 

gutengel 7 Years · 363 comments

I'm happy with Homekif in general, it works reliably most times, with a fairly simple set up. Siri on the other hand is such a pain! Success rate is about 75% and it doesn't under context. Why can't they add whispering options or a shut up schedule for it? I hate when every I whisper "all light off" late at night, and Siri shouts "OK, ALL THE LIGHTS ARE OFF NOW!" This is the kind attention to detail Apple used to be known for, but I guess Alexa and even Google are beating them on their own game.