Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Streaming now accounts for 79% of US music industry revenue, RIAA says

Source: RIAA

Last updated

Streaming services like Apple Music, Spotify and Pandora generated $8.8 billion to account for 79% of all U.S. music industry revenue in 2019, according to new data from the Recording Industry Association of America.

In its full-year 2019 revenue report for U.S. recorded music, the RIAA says streaming revenues were up 20% from 2018, a marked rise largely attributed to growth in paid streaming services. The overall industry grew 13% to hit $11.1 billion in retail value.

According to the report, revenues derived from subscriptions hit $6.8 billion last year, up 25% year-over-year. That sum equates to 61% of total recorded music revenues in the U.S., the group notes. Impressively, subscriptions accounted for 93% of streaming sector growth, with for-pay services adding an average of one million new accounts per month to top 60 million subscriptions in 2019.

RIAA Chairman and CEO Mitch Glazier in a blog post on Tuesday said, "Music isn't transitioning to digital' - it is leading a digital-first business."

"Today's report reflects the prospect of a future in which creators have a path forward," Glazier said. "But it also reveals how much farther we must go to assure a healthy music community in which all music is valued and creators are fairly compensated. We still have not realized the full value of music on all digital services."

Over the past ten years, streaming revenue has grown from a minuscule 5% slice of the overall pie to overtake both traditional physical media and digital downloads initially popularized by iTunes. In 2009, physical media accounted for 59% of all industry revenue followed by digital's 34% share, figures that slid to a respective 10% and 8% of the whole in 2019.

Downloads have dropped precipitously as streaming usurps per-track and per-album purchases. According to the RIAA, digital fell 18% between 2018 and 2019, with last year being the first since 2006 in which downloads brought in less than a billion dollars, reports Variety. For reference, streaming revenues first surpassed sales of digital downloads in 2015.

After revolutionizing the music distribution industry with iTunes and iPod, Apple debuted its own streaming service, Apple Music, in 2015. The product challenges market incumbent Spotify, which boasted 124 million paid subscribers as of February. Apple last released public Apple Music statistics in June 2019, when the service accumulated 60 million subscribers.



13 Comments

bobolicious 10 Years · 1177 comments

...does the 'music industry' truly include musicians...? https://musically.com/2019/11/22/artist-zoe-keating-reveals-latest-spotify-per-stream-payouts/ I buy direct in an attempt to support creators, including CDs at concerts as I can. Are there also privacy implications of both download and streaming services...?

Beats 4 Years · 3073 comments

Apple needs to take this space more seriously. Is this the first time Apple was 2nd place since the original iPod?

chasm 10 Years · 3624 comments

Apple is probably not in second place when you look at revenue from streaming -- they're probably in first place. Spotify has more "paid" users, but a huge number of them are subsidized users who aren't actually paying directly -- its part of their cell phone bill. To date, Spotify has been unable to turn a profit with all those users -- suggesting the income-per-user average is low (and that's with Spotify still in court for not paying all royalties!).

Apple's subscriptions are full cost (across the single/family/student tiers), which allows them to, you know, pay artists. In fact, AM pays the highest rate of royalties among the various streamers. Given the growth and profitability of Services at Apple, I feel confident saying that at present there is only one or maybe twos streaming music service making a profit, and I doubt Amazon Music or YouTube Music is in the black yet.

Beats 4 Years · 3073 comments

chasm said:
Apple is probably not in second place when you look at revenue from streaming -- they're probably in first place. Spotify has more "paid" users, but a huge number of them are subsidized users who aren't actually paying directly -- its part of their cell phone bill. To date, Spotify has been unable to turn a profit with all those users -- suggesting the income-per-user average is low (and that's with Spotify still in court for not paying all royalties!).

Apple's subscriptions are full cost (across the single/family/student tiers), which allows them to, you know, pay artists. In fact, AM pays the highest rate of royalties among the various streamers. Given the growth and profitability of Services at Apple, I feel confident saying that at present there is only one or maybe twos streaming music service making a profit, and I doubt Amazon Music or YouTube Music is in the black yet.

I saw this coming but seriously how far ahead was iTunes compared to...... whoever was 2nd place?

CloudTalkin 5 Years · 916 comments

chasm said:
Apple is probably not in second place when you look at revenue from streaming -- they're probably in first place. Spotify has more "paid" users, but a huge number of them are subsidized users who aren't actually paying directly -- its part of their cell phone bill. To date, Spotify has been unable to turn a profit with all those users -- suggesting the income-per-user average is low (and that's with Spotify still in court for not paying all royalties!).

Apple's subscriptions are full cost (across the single/family/student tiers), which allows them to, you know, pay artists. In fact, AM pays the highest rate of royalties among the various streamers. Given the growth and profitability of Services at Apple, I feel confident saying that at present there is only one or maybe twos streaming music service making a profit, and I doubt Amazon Music or YouTube Music is in the black yet.

Nothing you wrote makes any sense.  Apple subs aren't all full cost.  Verizon does free Apple music subs.  Both AM and Spotify have run -and are still running- multiple promotions.  Some of the subs for both companies are subsidized.  Apple and Spotify charge the same amount for their services.   Math does not support your assertions of Apple being in first place from a revenue standpoint.  It also doesn't support your confidence of profitability related to Apple Music.  That leap in logic you made -Services is growing and profitable as an entire division, therefore Apple Music is profitable as a part of that division- is not logical at all.  I doubt you could come up with any viable math that remotely supports your opinions.

It's more likely that Apple, Amazon, and Google are all floating their music streaming services.