Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Full third-party cookie blocking comes to Safari two years ahead of Chrome

Safari Intelligent Tracking Prevention has lead the industry in privacy protections

Last updated

Along with iOS 13.4, Safari was updated with improved Intelligent Tracking Prevention to include full third-party cookie blocking and other privacy features.

Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP) was introduced in 2017 and has gained several privacy features since. Initial reactions to the release were varying as publishers worried about how this would affect cross-site tracking and related data sources for ad sales.

ITP blocked cookies before, but left enough information for trackers to begin tracking users based on what was being blocked. With the newest update, even this type of tracking and fingerprinting is blocked. Google Chrome is expected to have full third-party cookie blocking by 2022.

According to the WebKit Blog, Websites have long used login fingerprinting to track users based on login states in websites. Full third-party cookie blocking prevents websites from seeing information about the "global browser state" which allows them to see what websites you were signed into previously.

No telling yet how this will again affect ad firms, as even with its limitations previously, it was reported that hundreds of millions in revenue were being lost as a result of ITP. Apple has always taken a strong privacy stance with its devices and services, even to the point of world governments pushing for them to weaken security.



15 Comments

NinjaMan 64 comments · 4 Years

"No telling yet how this will again affect ad firms, as even with its limitations previously, it was reported that hundreds of millions in revenue were being lost as a result of ITP...." As someone who works for one of the big 5 holding companies, ITP had no measurable impact - work arounds for data stitching and backdoors were identified pretty quickly so no meaningful losses ever surfaced. One work around that worked well was having advertisers drop the cookie from their site so it registered as a 1st party cookie and not a 3rd party. It took Apple a couple of releases to patch that but other methods exist. Maybe smaller performance based firms seen something but collectively it never reached losses of hundreds of millions of dollars. Even blocking 3rd party cookies will have a less than expected impact because tech exists and continues to be developed for advertising to exist in a cookie-less world.

ericthehalfbee 4489 comments · 13 Years

NinjaMan said:
"No telling yet how this will again affect ad firms, as even with its limitations previously, it was reported that hundreds of millions in revenue were being lost as a result of ITP...." As someone who works for one of the big 5 holding companies, ITP had no measurable impact - work arounds for data stitching and backdoors were identified pretty quickly so no meaningful losses ever surfaced. One work around that worked well was having advertisers drop the cookie from their site so it registered as a 1st party cookie and not a 3rd party. It took Apple a couple of releases to patch that but other methods exist. Maybe smaller performance based firms seen something but collectively it never reached losses of hundreds of millions of dollars. Even blocking 3rd party cookies will have a less than expected impact because tech exists and continues to be developed for advertising to exist in a cookie-less world.

Translation: Asshole advertising companies will continue to find hacks, workarounds and other methods to track people even when they don’t want to be.

acejax805 109 comments · 10 Years

Still doesn't support ad blockers. About 5 years behind Chrome.

ihatescreennames 1977 comments · 19 Years

acejax805 said:
Still doesn't support ad blockers. About 5 years behind Chrome.

Huh? I’ve been blocking ads on iOS for a long time so I’m not sure what you are talking about. In fact, I whitelist AppleInsider since I’m here a lot and think they should earn money. Just now I went to my blocker, de-whitelisted appleinsider.com and reloaded the site just to verify and, sure enough, ads are blocked. So again, I’m not sure what you are talking about.

Edit: with appleinsider.com whitelisted there is an ad between comment one and comment two. Not so when de-whitelisted: