Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Warner Bros exec JP Richards named Apple TV+ head of marketing strategy

Apple has appointed current Warner Bros executive JP Richards the head of film marketing strategy for Apple TV+ as part of its original content strategy.

The executive will report to Apple video marketing chief Chris Van Amburg when he officially starts at Apple in February, Deadline reported. According to the report, Richards will assist Apple with its growing original film ambitions.

At Warner Bros, Richards served as the co-president of the studio's Worldwide Marketing division. He helped steer areas such as promotional partnerships, creative content, multi-cultural marketing, and strategy. During his tenure, the marketing executive oversaw campaigns for films such as "Wonder Woman," "Joker," "A Star is born," and "IT Chapter 1 and 2."

Before he worked at Warner Bros, he spent 12 years at Universal and held the title of senior vice president of digital marketing at the time of his departure.

Apple has been ramping up its original film content slate since its launch in 2019. Earlier in 2021, the company signed an order for Napoleon Bonaparte epic "Kitbag," which is set to star Joaquin Phoenix. In July 2020, Apple landed the rights to Will Smith film "Emancipation" in a record-breaking deal said to be around $100 million.

The Cupertino tech giant also won the rights to stream Tom Hanks war film "Greyhound," which premiered on Apple TV+ in July 2020.

In the wake of that film's success, reports claimed that Apple was planning to release more than a dozen feature-length films on Apple TV+ annually.



5 Comments

☕️
thrang 17 Years · 1038 comments

Could Apple buy a major theater chain, reinvent them as Apple Centers for the Arts & Technology and show theatrical films, concerts, TED-like talks, standup. etc? Or would there be antitrust issues?

The film release strategy could be thirty to forty-five days in their theaters, followed by migration to Apple TV as exclusive content.

This will be of high interest to major film makers who are increasingly untrustworthy of studios/streamers diminishing the theatrical experience (WB being the latest), and perhaps would be seen to be the best of both worlds for many of them to move to production deals with Apple. So the long term play here is content ownership, even though it would be a loss at the start. I'm guessing AMC is (relatively) dirt cheap now...

Apple could integrate some level of interactive or pre/post event services/content into the experiences, and have technology showcases in most or all of the locations to showcase their products and related talent, "behind the curtain" educational/informational pods, etc. They could offer an outlet for local schools and colleges to put on performances and art showcases.

Remember, Apple is at the intersection of ...



(ok, not precisely a liberal arts play, but you get the drift...)

🎅
SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

Jesus. Can’t they afford to hire someone like Bob Iger instead of this guy from a studio known for only having hit movies completely by accident?

🎅
davidmalcolm 9 Years · 404 comments

thrang said:
Could Apple buy a major theater chain, reinvent them as Apple Centers for the Arts & Technology and show theatrical films, concerts, TED-like talks, standup. etc? Or would there be antitrust issues?

The film release strategy could be thirty to forty-five days in their theaters, followed by migration to Apple TV as exclusive content.

This will be of high interest to major film makers who are increasingly untrustworthy of studios/streamers diminishing the theatrical experience (WB being the latest), and perhaps would be seen to be the best of both worlds for many of them to move to production deals with Apple. So the long term play here is content ownership, even though it would be a loss at the start. I'm guessing AMC is (relatively) dirt cheap now...

Apple could integrate some level of interactive or pre/post event services/content into the experiences, and have technology showcases in most or all of the locations to showcase their products and related talent, "behind the curtain" educational/informational pods, etc. They could offer an outlet for local schools and colleges to put on performances and art showcases.

Remember, Apple is at the intersection of ...



(ok, not precisely a liberal arts play, but you get the drift...)

I actually love this idea. They wouldn’t even need to run them as theatres. They’d have theatres, but they’d also be places where they could do classes, have 1 on 1 appointments, sell iPhones, etc. 


My major concern with this though, is what kind of Arts would they be doing? Granted with TV+ Apple is actually producing content. But previously they liked to keep an almost Disney like vibe. So would it lean more toward ballet, classical, or folk where the crowds aren’t rowdy, or would they have rock and hardcore shows?

I feel like the idea is fun in concept but the more I think about it the more I think it would open Apple up to criticism or potential legal problems. (Somebody crowd surfs at a concert, breaks their neck, Apple is a huge lawsuit target.)

also theatres are a massive commitment for rent. They might get the building cheap, but making money in it post pandemic (assuming there is a post pandemic) might not be a sure enough bet for them to take a bite. 

🌟
bestkeptsecret 13 Years · 4289 comments

I'm excited about Ridley Scott doing a period piece. I'm not so excited that it stars Joaquin Phoenix.

☕️
Rayz2016 8 Years · 6957 comments

Jesus. Can’t they afford to hire someone like Bob Iger instead of this guy from a studio known for only having hit movies completely by accident?

Well, you were happy to let a bankrupt game show host run a country so … 🤷🏾‍♂️