Malcolm Owen
An antitrust regulator in the Netherlands is once again investigating whether Apple has done enough to comply with its order over dating app alternative payment options, after Apple said it would still require developers to pay a 27% commission for using a third-party payment system.
On February 4, it was revealed that Apple intended to charge developers a 27% commission fee for Dutch dating apps in the App Store that use alternate payment methods than the existing in-app purchases mechanism. The Authority for Consumers and Markets (ACM) is now looking into whether Apple complies with the order under the new measure.
The ACM requires Apple to allow dating apps in the Netherlands to handle in-app purchases through other methods, which Apple has worked to comply with. However, Apple said it intended to collect its commission from off-platform app-related purchases, with the 27% rate down from 30% to exclude the costs of payment processing.
The ACM told Reuters on Monday, Feb. 7 that it was looking at Apple's changes to see if the company now complies with the rules. Later on Monday, the regulator fined Apple another $5.7 million.
A previous examination on January 4 determined Apple didn't do enough, and the ACM started to levy a weekly 5 million euro ($5.6 million) fine. At the time, Apple insisted it was in compliance with the order, but the ACM disagreed.
The ACM said Apple hadn't implemented its plans for dating app developer payment options, but had instead only laid out its plans and allowed developers to register their interest.
Under Apple's changes, developers could choose between using the existing IAP system, including a third-party mechanism in the app, or linking out of the app to collect payment elsewhere. For the latter two, Apple would "not be aware of purchases," so the developers would have to handle users with "refunds, purchase history, subscription management" and related queries.
Apple would also need developers to report sales, and for the payment of the reduced commission, under the penalty of removal from the App Store or the Apple Developer program entirely.
Update 12:00 p.m. ET: Updated with weekly fine on Apple.
-m.jpg)
Amber Neely
Sponsored Content
Charles Martin
Christine McKee
17 Comments
Good luck ACM! What are they going to say now. Apple is not allowed to charge for use of their platform. There is not something like a free ride in this world :-)
pwrmac said:
If Apple wants to insist on these fees, the regulators should just go for the sideloading angle instead.
They can't charge a commission when they aren't the ones selling the product.
"Look, it's our store and our infrastructure. You're going to pay us to use it, one way or another. Or you're not going to use it."
The regulators wanted alternative payment systems, they got them. Their order said nothing about Apple not being able to charge a commission.
And how’s that working out for Google? From what I read the vast, vast, majority of Android users stick with the Google Play Store. Even with third party app stores Google is still being attacked for its commissions policy. So even though users can go to other app stores they still use Google Play and willingly pay the 30% commission.
So who are the sots that are always clamoring for all this fake ‘freedom’?