Arm IPO could be blocked by UK on national security grounds

... an explanation for the rest of us please? Maybe a bit more context would help.

AppleInsider said:

The UK government is reportedly hinting it may use national security laws to force Arm to hold its IPO on the London markets instead of in the US.

Arm's current owner SoftBank has already faced problems from China over getting an Initial Public Offering (IPO) that would see the processor design firm listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Now the UK is pressing for SoftBank to list Arm in London instead.

According to the Financial Times, the UK government has considered using powers under its new National Security and Investment Act (NSIA), but it has not formally done so. Instead, an unspecified source involved says that the UK is so far using "carrots" instead of "sticks" over the issue.

However, reportedly the message to SoftBank, according to the source, was effectively "you don't want to make an enemy of us."

Internally, the UK government is divided over using NSIA regulations because it's debatable whether they even apply. According to the Financial Times, the government denies having raised national security concerns with SoftBank.

Nonetheless, the source reports that SoftBank's leadership were aware of what was described as a ploy. A second source said that national security issues would come in to play if a non-UK company used the IPO to take a significant stake in Arm.

SoftBank does not have to pick a listing venue for some months yet, and it is possible that it will adopt a dual-listing. The Financial Times says this would be seen as a win for the UK, which following Brexit and government policies is seen as less attractive for technology companies.

The move to create a separate Arm firm through an IPO follows SoftBank's failure to sell the company to Nvidia. In that case, Nvidia backed out of the deal after national security concerns from the UK, and anti-competition issues in the US.

Huh?!

amar99 said:

... an explanation for the rest of us please? Maybe a bit more context would help.

SoftBank own ARM

SoftBank tried to sell ARM to nVidia, a US company

UK government said no for national security reasons

Now SoftBank want to sell off ARM on a stock exchange

Many stock exchanges exist around the world, US ones are often more popular for tech stocks

Article says that the UK government may require SoftBank to use the London stock exchange, again for national security reasons

Article also says that if a non-UK company tries to buy a controlling interest in ARM then the UK government may get involved again

What additional context do you need?

What additional context do you need?

That did the job!
thank you.

crowley said:

amar99 said:

... an explanation for the rest of us please? Maybe a bit more context would help.

SoftBank own ARM

SoftBank tried to sell ARM to nVidia, a US company

UK government said no for national security reasons

Now SoftBank want to sell off ARM on a stock exchange

Many stock exchanges exist around the world, US ones are often more popular for tech stocks

Article says that the UK government may require SoftBank to use the London stock exchange, again for national security reasons

Article also says that if a non-UK company tries to buy a controlling interest in ARM then the UK government may get involved again

What additional context do you need?

Thanks! I was going to leave it at that, but since you asked what other context we need, "UK government said no for national security reasons" is not self explanatory. What does that mean in this context? Are they using ARM to spy on every user and don't want to be found out? The term national security is just so over used it's difficult to know how to interpret that sentence.